|Table of Contents|

Physiological Response of Six Cut Chrysanthemum Varieties to Alkali Stress and Evaluation of Alkali Tolerance

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年17
Page:
86-93
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Physiological Response of Six Cut Chrysanthemum Varieties to Alkali Stress and Evaluation of Alkali Tolerance
Author(s):
HU Taotao; LUO Yan; HU Ying; WANG Lingling; ZHANG Li; YAN Rui
（School of Agriculture,Ningxia University,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750021）
Keywords:
chrysanthemum; alkali resistance; growth characteristics; principal component analysis
PACS:
S 682.1+1
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20225176
Abstract:
Six cut chrysanthemum varieties were treated with different concentrations (0,20,40,60 mmol·L-1) of Na2CO3.The growth and physiological indexes of different chrysanthemum varieties were measured and their alkali resistance was comprehensively evaluated by principal component analysis and subordination function.The effects of alkali stress on the morphological changes and physiological indexes of different cut chrysanthemum varieties were studied,in order to provide reference for the promotion of chrysanthemum varieties in northwest saline alkali areas.The results showed that under alkali stress,there were significant differences among various indexes of different varieties,and the growth was inhibited.The plant height,leaf length,leaf width,leaf number,chlorophyll content (SPAD) and relative water content (RWC) of leaves were decreased significantly with the increase of the stress level.The most obvious drop was ‘Kaiwenfen’ and ‘Yinxingzi’；compared with CK,the relative electrical conductivity (REC) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content of Na2CO3 treatment increased significantly,while the superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) increased first and then decreased.Using principal component analysis and membership function analysis,four principal components were extracted,and the cumulative contribution rate reached 86.442%.The indicators with high score coefficient include REC,MDA content,SOD activity and leaf width,which could be used as important indicators for screening and evaluation of alkali tolerance.According to the value of D,the six chrysanthemum varieties were ranked in order of alkali resistance,‘Gongzhuxin’>‘Funi’>‘Tiaowen’>‘Hancheng’>‘Yinxingzi’>‘Kaiwenfen’.‘Gongzhuxin’ has relatively strong alkali resistance,which could be popularized as an alkali resistant variety,followed by ‘Funi’,‘Kaiwenfeng’ had the weakest alkali resistance.

References:

［1］ 管志勇,陈发棣,滕年军,等.5种菊花近缘种属植物的耐盐性比较［J］.中国农业科学,2010,43(4):787-794.［2］ 白柠毓,严媚欣,白茹,等.混合盐碱处理对不同种源罗布麻幼苗生长的影响［J］.农业科技通讯,2022(10):101-105.［3］ GARIMA P,BHAN Y C,PANKAJ S P,et al.Salinity induced differential methylation patterns in contrasting cultivars of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)［J］.Plant Cell Reports,2017,36(5):1-14.［4］ AMIRINEJAD A A.Salicylic acid improves salinity-alkalinity tolerance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)［J］.Advances in Horticultural Science,2017,31(3):157-163.［5］ 刘辉.番茄耐寒种质低温胁迫下的转录组分析及相关基因功能鉴定［D］.武汉:华中农业大学,2012.［6］ 高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导［M］.北京:高等教育出版社,2006.［7］ 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术［M］.北京:高等教育出版社,2000.［8］ 周广生,梅方竹,周竹青,等.小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测［J］.中国农业科学,2003(11):1378-1382.［9］ 马瑞娟,张斌斌,蔡志翔,等.不同桃砧木品种对淹水的光合响应及其耐涝性评价［J］.园艺学报,2013,40(3):409-416.［10］李港,彭慧敏,蔡小东,等.5个生姜品种对淹水胁迫的生理响应及耐涝性评价［J］.南方农业学报,2022,53(8):2196-2204.［11］LU H Y,WANG Z Q,XU C Y,et al.Multiomics analysis provides insights into alkali stress tolerance of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)［J］.Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2021(5):32.［12］刘杰.向日葵对碱胁迫和盐胁迫适应机制比较［D］.长春:东北师范大学,2011.［13］MONSHAUSEN G B,BIBIKOVA T N,MESSERLI M A,et al.Oscillations in extracellular pH and reactive oxygen species modulate tip growth of Arabidopsis root hairs［J］.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2007,104(52):20996-21001.［14］LI R,SHI F,FUKUDA K.Interactive effects of various salt and alkali stresses on growth,organic solutes,and cation accumulation in a halophyte Spartina alterniflora (Poaceae)［J］.Environmental and Experimental Botany,2010,68(1)：66-74.［15］张凌,高翱,张芸香.4个树种对盐碱胁迫的响应［J］.西北林学院学报,2018,33(6):56-60.［16］ZHANG H H,WANG Y,LI X,et al.Chlorophyll synthesis and the photoprotective mechanism in leaves of mulberry (Morus alba L.) seedlings under NaCl and NaHCO3 stress revealed by TMT-based proteomics analyses［J］.Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2020,190：10164.［17］吴旭红,董雪芹.碱胁迫对甜瓜幼苗生长及光合色素含量和抗氧化作用的影响［J］.种子,2011,30(8):62-64.［18］褚敏.耐碱高粱品种筛选及碱胁迫对高粱幼苗的影响［D］.大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2022.［19］李英丽,方正,毛明艳.不同燕麦品种耐碱性筛选和鉴定［J］.河北农业大学学报,2014,37(6):13-17.［20］杨翼飞,李青萍,朱世平,等.6份枳种质耐酸碱胁迫能力的比较［J］.中国南方果树,2017,46(2):1-6.［21］BARTELS D,SUNKAR R.Drought and salt tolerance in plants［J］.Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences,2005,24(1):23-58.［22］许瑛,陈发棣.菊花8个品种的低温半致死温度及其抗寒适应性［J］.园艺学报,2008(4):559-564.［23］楚乐乐,罗成科,田蕾,等.植物对碱胁迫适应机制的研究进展［J］.植物遗传资源学报,2019,20(4):836-844.［24］杨欢,李锦馨,姚爱彬,等.3个茶用菊花品种应对碱胁迫的生理响应及耐碱性评价［J］.南方农业报,2020,51(12):2993-3003.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-11-16