|Table of Contents|

Effects of Planting Age on Nutrient Input and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Greenhouse Grape Vineyards

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年22
Page:
76-84
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Planting Age on Nutrient Input and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Greenhouse Grape Vineyards
Author(s):
LI Jiawei1; 2; HAN Xiuli1; 2; WANG Mengdi1; 2; ZHANG Zitao1; 2; GUO Yanjie1; 3; JI Yanzhi1; 3
(1.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences，Hebei Agricultural University，Baoding，Hebei 071000;2.Di Hongjie Soil and Environment Laboratory，Hebei Agricultural University，Baoding，Hebei 071000;3.Hebei Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecological Environment，Baoding，Hebei 071000)
Keywords:
facility grapes; planting years; nutrient inputs; soil physicochemical properties
PACS:
S 663.1
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20224718
Abstract:
Taking 20 facility vineyards with different planting ages as the research object，the method of tracking investigation and experimental analysis was used to explore the influence of different planting ages of facility grapes on nutrient input and soil physicochemical properties，in order to improve the problem of excessive nutrient input and soil degradation in facility vineyards.The results showed that,1) the total nutrient input in the facility vineyard was N 1 158.91-2 221.80 kg·hm-2，P2O5 442.77-865.02 kg·hm-2，and K2O 830.05-1 516.05 kg·hm-2，with organic fertilizer carrying 71.5%，42.7% and 57.3% of the total nutrients，respectively.2) With the increase of planting period，the surface bulk density of the soil in the 1-5 years had increased by 22.83%-23.81% compared to other planting periods;the clay content (<0.002 mm) gradually accumulated in the lower layer with the increase of planting period.3) The soil pH in the 0-20 cm soil layer of grapes planted for more than 15 years decreased by 0.49 units compared with grapes planted for 1-5 years，and the soil pH in the root zone of grapes decreased with the increase of planting period.4) The organic matter content in the 0-20 cm soil layer increased significantly with the planting period，and the content of grapes planted for more than 15 years increased by 21.03%-123.50% compared with other planting periods;the rich or higher level reached 76.19%.The nitrate nitrogen content in the 0-20 cm soil layer increased by 1.46%-147.37% compared with other planting periods in grapes planted for 1-5 years;52.38% of nitrate nitrogen in the 0-20 cm soil layer was lacking level，and it appeared to leach into the deep soil.The contents of available phosphorus and quick-acting potassium increased with the increase of planting period，and the upper layer was higher than the lower layer;the proportion of rich or above level was 90.48%-100.00% and 100.00%，respectively.In summary，the soil nutrients in the facility vineyard exceeded the grape demand with different planting periods.With the increase of planting period，the soil pH in the root zone significantly decreased;the organic matter and phosphorus and potassium content showed an increasing trend at the surface level，but the deep change was not significant;there was a risk of leaching loss of nitrate nitrogen in the soil.

References:

［1］王世平,李勃.中国设施葡萄发展概况［J］.落叶果树,2019,51(1):1-5.［2］卢维宏,张乃明,包立,等.我国设施栽培连作障碍特征与成因及防治措施的研究进展［J］.土壤,2020,52(4):651-658.［3］郭德杰,王光飞,马艳,等.苏北桃园土壤及施肥现状与发展建议［J］.江苏农业科学,2021,49(20):222-227.［4］SCHREINER R P，SCAGEL C F，BAHAM J.Nutrient uptake and distribution in a mature ‘Pinot Noir’ vineyard［J］.Hortscience A Publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science，2006，41:336-345.［5］PRADUBSUK S，DAVENPORT J R.Seasonal uptake and partitioning of macronutrients in mature ‘Concord’ grape［J］.Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science American Society for Horticultural Science，2010，135(5):474-483.［6］王志慧,马振朝,张丽娟,等.河北葡萄园施肥与土壤养分演变及其对产量的影响［J］.北方园艺,2020(7):106-115.［7］文方芳.种植年限对设施大棚土壤次生盐渍化与酸化的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料,2016(4):49-53.［8］石宗琳,武大勇,王益权,等.不同种植年限对渭北地区果园土壤理化性质的影响［J］.河南农业大学学报,2019,53(5):799-805.［9］王学霞,陈延华,王甲辰,等.设施菜地种植年限对土壤理化性质和生物学特征的影响［J］.植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(6):1619-1629.［10］鲍士旦.土壤农化分析［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.［11］李宝鑫,杨俐苹,卢艳丽,等.我国葡萄主产区的土壤养分丰缺状况［J］.中国农业科学,2020,53(17):3553-3566.［12］全国农业技术推广服务中心.中国有机肥料养分志［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,1999.［13］王探魁.河北葡萄主产区土壤与树体养分特征研究［D］.保定:河北农业大学,2011.［14］王海波,史祥宾,王孝娣,等.设施葡萄植株不同生育阶段矿质营养需求特性研究［J］.园艺学报,2020,47(11):2121-2131.［15］肖庆礼,陈昆燕,代先强,等.牛粪有机肥对植烟黄壤理化性质及持水能力的影响［J］.中国烟草学报,2020,26(2):57-64.［16］SYAHARUDIN Z，STEPHEN H，NEWELL R，et al.Hydraulic properties affected by topsoil thickness in switchgrass and corn-soybean cropping systems［J］.Soil Science Society of America Journal,2016,80(5):1365-1376.［17］黄晶淼,刘国鑫,刘佩杭,等.不同种植年限苹果园根际土壤养分、pH及微生物的相关性［J］.山西农业科学,2020,48(8):1263-1266.［18］WANG J，SARDANS C，ZENG C，et al.Responses of soil nutrient concentrations and stoichiometry to different human land uses in a subtropical tidal wetland［J］.Geoderma,2014,232/234:459-470.［19］周青云,王仰仁,孙书洪.根系分区交替滴灌条件下葡萄根系分布特征及生长动态［J］.农业机械学报,2011,42(9):58-63.［20］王金云,程宪国,郭继斌,等.设施桃园土壤养分变化规律及评价［J］.作物杂志,2017(3):96-103.［21］唐海滨,廖超英,孙长忠.山东寿光蔬菜大棚土壤养分的时空变化特征［J］.西北农业学报,2011,20(4):134-137.［22］高新昊,张英鹏,刘兆辉,等.种植年限对寿光设施大棚土壤生态环境的影响［J］.生态学报,2015,35(5):1452-1459.［23］杨广,汪玉,王慎强,等.阳山水蜜桃园肥料投入及不同种植年限土壤养分累积现状［J/OL］.土壤学报,（2022-08-24）［2022-10-18］.https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C45S0n9fL2suRadTyEVl2pW9UrhTDCdPD655MTJoSk-upOmCb8k250vif9BauFMAnMNObLPb9bJDvrwH_RBzLtVe&u niplatform=NZKPT.［24］王志秀,贺婧,陈锋.贺兰山东麓葡萄产地不同种植年限土壤养分特征研究［J］.中国土壤与肥料,2019(3):15-21.［25］方兵,陈林,王阳,等.设施农业土壤磷素累积迁移转化及影响因素［J］.环境科学,2023,44(1):452-462.［26］贾志航,吕明露,张鑫,等.不同种植年限苹果园土壤磷状况和无机磷组分特征［J］.水土保持学报,2020,34(5):308-312，320.［27］LU D J，DONG Y H，CHEN X Q，et al.Comparison of potential potassium leaching associated with organic and inorganic potassium sources in different arable soils in China［J］.Pedosphere,2022,32(2):330-338.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-12-15