|Table of Contents|

Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Replacing Organic Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients,Enzyme Activities and Production and Quality of Radix pseudostellariae

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年14
Page:
79-86
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Replacing Organic Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients,Enzyme Activities and Production and Quality of Radix pseudostellariae
Author(s):
YU Gao12CHEN Fen1WANG Hai3
(1.Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in the Fanjing Mountain Region,Tongren University,Tongren,Guizhou 554300;2.Guizhou Baili Gallery Ecological Agricultural Technology Development Co.Ltd.,Tongren,Guizhou 565300;3.Tongren Science and Technology Innovation Development Center,Tongren,Guizhou 554300)
Keywords:
biological organic fertilizerRadix pseudostellariaeyieldqualitynutrient
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20224622
Abstract:
Taking ‘Shitai No 1’ Radix pseudostellariae as the test material,a field test was conducted with five treatments,100% NPK chemical fertilizer (T1),70% NPK chemical fertilizer+1 350 kg?hm-2 biological organic fertilizer (T2),50% NPK chemical fertilizer+2 250 kg?hm-2 biological organic fertilizer (T3),30% NPK chemical fertilizer+3 150 kg?hm-2 biological organic fertilizer (T4),and 4 500 kg?hm-2 biological organic fertilizer (T5).The effects of different proportion of organic fertilizer replacing chemical fertilizer on soil organic matter,nutrients,soil enzyme activities,and yield and quality of Radix pseudostellariae were studied,in order to provide reference for scientific reduction of chemical fertilizers,rational application of organic fertilizers,and the high yield and quality of the traditional Chinese medicine Radix pseudostellariae industry in Guizhou Province.The results showed that soil organic matter content,available phosphorus content,soil catalase activity,sucrase activity and urease activity showed a rising trend with the increasing proportion of organic fertilizer replacing chemical fertilizer,while soil available potassium content and phosphatase activity showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing.The contents of soil organic matter and available phosphorus in T5 treatment were 17.13%-74.26% and 16.69%-78.08% higher than those in other treatments,respectively,and reached a significant level.The yield of Radix pseudostellariae in T3 treatment was the highest,significantly higher than that in other treatments.There was no significant difference between T3,T4 and T5 treatments in drying rate and soluble extracts of Radix pseudostellariae,but they were significantly higher than T1 and T2 treatments.In general,organic manure replacing chemical fertilizer could significantly increase the content of soil organic matter,improve the soil nutrient status,stimulate soil enzyme activities,promote the absorption and utilization of soil nutrients by Radix pseudostellariae,and facilitate the growth and development of Radix pseudostellariae.In this experiment,the best treatment was T3,which gave consideration to good soil biochemical characteristics and high yield and quality of Radix pseudostellariae,and effectively reduced the amount of chemical fertilizer.

References:

[1]林志敏,秦贤金,吴红淼,等.不同太子参品种对连作胁迫差异响应及种内间作效应分析[J].作物学报,2022,48(9):2351-2365.[2]孔钰婷,何洪,安凤平,等.太子参提取物抗氧化能力的比较研究[J].食品研究与开发,2021,42(19):28-35.[3]林燕华,周春权,陈炬烽.太子参化感自毒作用的研究[J].中药材,2019,42(4):709-714.[4]张礼维,韦鑫,王秀云,等.不同施肥处理对太子参生长、根腐病发生及产量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(5):236-238.[5]GUO X X,LIU H T,WU S B,et al.Humic substances developed during organic waste composting:Formation mechanisms,structural properties,and agronomic functions[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,662:501-510.[6]肖婉君,郭凤霞,陈垣,等.施用有机肥对当归药材性状、产量及抗病性的影响[J].草业学报,2021,30(3):189-199.[7]〖JP+1〗张亚琴,邓秋林,文秋姝,等.浅谈科学施肥在中药材生态种植中的作用与措施[J].中国中药杂志,2020,45(20):4846-4852.[8]白由路.中国农业科学院植物营养与肥料研究60年[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(6):1409-1415.[9]崔元培,魏子鲲,王建忠,等.“双减”背景下化肥、农药施用现状与发展路径[J].北方园艺,2021(9):164-173.[10]杜为研,唐杉,汪洪.我国有机肥资源及产业发展现状[J].中国土壤与肥料,2020(3):210219.[11]ZHAO S C,LI K J,ZHOU W,et al.Changes in soil microbial community,enzyme activities and organic matter fractions under long term straw return in north central China[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2016,216:82-88.[12]余高,陈芬,谢英荷,等.化肥减施、有机肥配施对辣椒产量及品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2020(4):47-53.[13]朱利霞,曹萌萌,桑成琛,等.生物有机肥替代化肥对玉米土壤肥力及酶活性的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2022,40(1):67-72.[14]韩正砥,周明耀,杨雅琴,等.生物有机肥配施对节水灌溉稻田养分累积及水稻生长的影响[J].水资源与水工程学报,2022,33(4):210-216.[15]茹朝,郁继华,武玥,等.化肥减量配施生物有机肥对露地大白菜产量及品质的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2022,34(8):1626-1637.[16]余高,陈芬,谢英荷,等.有机肥替代化肥比例对黄壤土活性有机碳及酶活性的影响[J].中国蔬菜,2020(4):48-55.[17]张俊峰,颉建明,张玉鑫,等.生物有机肥部分替代化肥对日光温室黄瓜产量、品质及肥料利用率的影响[J].中国蔬菜,2020(6):58-63.[18]李进,袁春新,孙正国,等.化肥减量配施生物有机肥对大棚连作草莓的影响[J].中国果树,2022(11):12-16.[19]沙新林,郭松,杨惠勤,等.优化配施生物有机肥对大棚西瓜生长发育及品质的影响[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2022,43(5):122-128.[20]王庆,杨云成,李丹丹,等.生态因子对中药材品质影响的研究进展[J].特产研究,2022,44(2):127-131,138.[21]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2007.[22]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.[23]国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药黄:一部[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020.[24]王兴龙,朱敏,杨帆,等.配施有机肥减氮对川中丘区土壤微生物量与酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):271-276.[25]张俊峰,颉建明,张玉鑫,等.生物有机肥部分替代化肥对日光温室番茄生长与光合特性及肥料利用率的影响[J].北方园艺,2022(11):44-50.[26]吴家梅,霍莲杰,纪雄辉,等.不同施肥处理对土壤活性有机碳和甲烷排放的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(18):6167-6175.[27]李琦,裴怀弟,马忠明,等.钾肥与有机肥配施对食用百合根际土壤酶活性、养分含量及鳞茎产量的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2020(1):91-99.[28]ZHAO H L,JIANG Y H,NING P,et al.Effect of different straw return modes on soil bacterial community,enzyme activities and organic carbon fractions[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2019,83(3):638-648.[29]陈浩宁,周怀平,文永莉,等.长期不同施肥下褐土养分及酶活性的生态化学计量特征[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(6):972-983.[30]刘寒双,崔纪菡,刘猛,等.有机肥替代部分化肥对谷子产量、土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2022(7):71-81.[31]宋以玲,于建,陈士更,等.化肥减量配施生物有机肥对油菜生长及土壤微生物和酶活性影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):352-360.[32]ARAB A,ZAMANI G,SAYYARI M,et al.Effects of chemical and biological fertilizers on morpho physiological traits of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.)[J].European Journal of Medicinal Plants,2015,8(1):60.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-08-29