|Table of Contents|

Effects of Biogas Slurry With Fertilizer on Growth,Quality,Heavy Metal of Sand-Cultivation Watermelon

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年17
Page:
47-53
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Biogas Slurry With Fertilizer on Growth,Quality,Heavy Metal of Sand-Cultivation Watermelon
Author(s):
ZHANG Jitao1SHI Xiangyuan1WANG Lin2ZHOU Jing1WANG Baoping1ZHANG Xiaochen1
(1.Shanxi Organic Dryland Agriculture Research Academic,Shanxi Agricultural University,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030031;2.Resource and Environment College,Shanxi Agricultural University,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030031)
Keywords:
biogas slurrywatermelonphotosynthesisfruit qualitycontent of heavy metalsand cultivation
PACS:
S 627
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20224290
Abstract:
‘Jinfu K8’ watermelon was used as the experimental materials,and CK(commercial water-soluble fertilizer),BS(biogas slurry),BSF(biogas slurry mixed fertilizer) treatments were set,the effects of different treatments on growth,photosynthesis,fruit quality,and heavy metal content of watermelon plants were studied by sand-cultivation method,in order to provide reference for the utilization of biogas slurry.The results showed that the growth rate of watermelon plants under BSF treatment was not significantly different from that under CK treatment,but significantly higher than that under BS.The Pn of CK,BS and BSF were significantly different among the treatments.There was no significant difference in Cond between BSF and CK,but it was significantly higher than BS.The weight per fruit of BSF was higher than CK by 48.6%,BS lower than CK by 17.6%.The soluble solid content of BS and BSF increased by 26.2% and 38.1%,the soluble sugar content by 19.4% and 18.3%,the soluble protein content by 14.6% and 72.9%,and the vitamin C content by 16.6% and 42.9% compared with CK.Pb content in root of BS and BSF significantly increased,but decreased the Pb content in shoot compared with CK.Cr content of root under BS treatments was increased,Cu content of root under BSF treatments was decreased,compared with CK in the same tissue of watermelon.The heavy metal contents of fruits were different among different treatments,while they were all below the standard limit.Based on the above results,BSF not only ensures plant growth rate,but also has a positive effect on improving photosynthesis and fruit quality of watermelon,and does not cause the risk of heavy metal accumulation in watermelon fruits.

References:

[1]宋英今,王冠超,李然,等.沼液处理方式及资源化研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(12):237-250.[2]王中军,颜振峰,张林琳,等.王建春.不同浓度沼液滴灌对设施栽培黄桃黄金蜜1号长势、产量和果实品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(24):164-166.[3]王莉,叶小梅,杜静,等.沼液不同施用方式对梨园土壤及梨果产量品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(20):138-143.[4]刘敏,纪立东,王锐,等.沼液配施化肥对土壤质量及作物生长的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2022(5):68-76.[5]郑健,朱传远,齐兴贇,等.不同生育阶段水/沼液一体化灌溉对番茄生长及产量和品质的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2022,41(5):64-71.[6]董颐玮,梁栋,李丹阳,等.沼液主要养分含量特征分析[J].江苏农业学报,2021,37(5):1206-1214.[7]王礼伟,汪国莲,王宏宝,等.沼液代替化肥对甜瓜生长及土壤微生物的影响[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(9):2498-2506.[8]王靖荃,谷端银,于晓东,等.沼液部分替代化肥在日光温室秋番茄上的应用效果[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(1):243-250.[9]任寒硕,MUHAMMADA,孙吉翠,等.沼液与化肥不同比例配施对番茄产量和品质的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2020,33(9):34-38.[10]杨鑫,胡笑涛,王文娥.沼液水培蔬菜的研究进展[J].北方园艺,2015(18):199-202.[11]杨鑫,王文娥,胡笑涛,等.沼液浓度对水培生菜营养液特性及产量、品质的影响[J].中国沼气,2016,34(6):110-114.[12]高同国,陈楠,李伟群,等.新型高效沼液营养液在蔬菜产量及品质上的效果[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(21):12684-12686.[13]DOMENICOR,LEONARDOS,CHIARAS,etal.Effects of solid and liquid digestate for hydroponic baby leaf lettuce(Lactucasativa L.)cultivation[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2019,244:172-181.[14]JAMESO,BEDESM,JRGRINKLEBE etal.Environmental implications,potentialvalue,and future offood-waste anaerobic digestate management:Areview[J].Journal of Environmenta lManagement,2022,318(9):115519.[15]周灵君,吕琳.沼液-土壤-蔬菜系统中重金属变化特征[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,39(3):63-69.[16]郭全忠,葛一洪,龚晓松,等.沼液用量对设施土壤养分和盐分累积与迁移的影响[J].陕西农业科学,2022,68(3):56-61.[17]赵金华,蒋卫杰,余宏军.沼液、化肥配施对西瓜产量和品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2010(4):53-56.[18]曹云,马艳,吴华山,等.沼液处理对土壤微生物性状及西瓜枯萎病发生的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2016(1):34-41.[19]周静,史向远,王保平,等.沼液营养液对设施西瓜生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2018(3):78-82.[20]中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,国家食品药品监督管理总局.食品安全国家标准食品中多元素的测定:GB5009268-2016[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.[21]边立丽,艾栋,陈玉蓝,等.基于SPAD值的烤烟氮素营养诊断研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2022(5):177-183.[22]中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,国家食品药品监督管理总局.食品安全国家标准食品中污染物限量:GB27620-2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.[23]王礼伟,汪国莲,王宏宝,等.沼液代替化肥对甜瓜生长及土壤微生物的影响[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(9):2498-2506.[24]张新建,赵秋,宁晓光.施用沼液肥对盆栽黄瓜生长、产量及品质的影响[J].天津农业科学,2020,26(5):5-8.[25]李然,余雪标,高刘,等.灌溉畜禽粪便沼液肥对辣椒光合作用及产量的影响[J].热带生物学报,2017,8(1):37-41.[26]胡正江,王昭晴,赵自超.华北小白菜产量、氮素利用及品质对沼液的响应[J].中国沼气,2022,40(3):24-28.[27]杨赟,郑健,齐兴贇.不同水-沼液一体化间接地下滴灌模式对番茄生长、产量和品质的影响[J].节水灌溉,2022(8):30-37,45.[28]李娇,时连辉,李恕艳,等.鸭粪沼液施用浓度对芹菜生长及品质的影响[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,52(3):377-383.[29]杨建霞,王秀文,宁海军,等.沼肥不同施肥量对大棚甜瓜生长发育及果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2020(22):60-65.[30]王小彬,闫湘,李秀英.畜禽粪污厌氧发酵沼液农用之环境安全风险[J].中国农业科学,2021,54(1):110-139.[31]中华人民共和国农业农村部.大量元素水溶肥料:NY/T1107-2020[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2020.[32]中华人民共和国农业农村部.含氨基酸水溶肥料:NY-1429-2018[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2018.[33]中华人民共和国农业农村部.含腐殖酸水溶肥料:NY-1106-2018[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2018.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-11-16