|Table of Contents|

Comparative Analysis of Internal Environment of Different Types ofSolar Greenhouses in Winter in Alpine Regions

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年12
Page:
44-50
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparative Analysis of Internal Environment of Different Types ofSolar Greenhouses in Winter in Alpine Regions
Author(s):
CHENG Li1ZHANG Guohui1YANG Shuai1WANG Chunyu1LIN Na2PAN Kai1
(1.College of Horticulture and Landscape,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150030;2.Shandong Binzhou University,Binzhou,Shandong 256600)
Keywords:
solar greenhousesingle layer filmdouble layer filmtemperaturelight intensity
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20223713
Abstract:
The greenhouses with single layer film red brick,double layer film quilt and double layer film composite wall were used as the experimental greenhouses,comparative analysis of internal environment determination was used,the effects of different types of solar greenhouses on their internal environment were studied,in order to provide reference for using of solar greenhouse.The results showed that the insulation performance of single film greenhouse was inferior to that of double film greenhouse,but the thermal storage capacity of single film red brick greenhouse was stronger than that of double film quilt greenhouse,composite wall insulation performance was stronger than quilt wall and red brick wall.In winter,the minimum temperature of the No.4 double film greenhouse was 12.85 ℃ higher than that of the No.27 single film greenhouse (CK),the cooling rate was 0.47 ℃?h-1 higher than that of the single film greenhouse,the relative humidity of No.4 and No.2 double film composite walls was less than No.27 single film red brick greenhouse (CK),the relative humidity of No.9 double film quilt greenhouse was higher than that of No.27 single film red brick greenhouse (CK),light transmittance of the double film greenhouse was higher than that of single film greenhouse.To sum up,the front roof was covered with double film and the rear wall was made of a composite material can improve the greenhouse insulation performance.

References:

[1]李式军.设施园艺学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2002.[2]邹志荣.园艺设施学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2002.[3]张福墁.设施园艺学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2010.[4]李天来.日光温室蔬菜栽培理论与实践[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2013.[5]袁兴福,李天来,印东生,等.我国北方现代日光温室的研制及效果评价[J].北方园艺,2007(1):54-56.[6]魏晓明,周长吉,曹楠,等.中国日光温室结构及性能的演变[J].江苏农业学报,2012,28(4):855-860.[7]王铁良,白义奎.辽沈系列日光温室类型与应用[J].新农业,2011(2):29-30.[8]唐中祺.不同跨度日光温室结构设计及升温保温性能研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014.[9]裴红霞,崔静英,赵云霞,等.宁夏不同二代节能日光温室小气候对比分析[J].北方园艺,2014(20):42-45.[10] 吴曼丽,张淑杰,孙立德,等.不同类型日光温室气温对比分析[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(11):227-228,230-234.[11] 赵丽玲,颉建明,赵贵宾.不同日光温室结构类型温光特性研究[J].西南农业学报,2015,28(4):1803-1808.[12] 袁余,李鹏程,李铭,等.双层膜日光温室设计及其热性能测试分析[J].农业现代化研究,2017,38(5):900-906.[13] 宋明军,赵鹏,张斌祥,等.单层和双层膜组装式日光温室环境性能比较分析[J].中国农机化学报,2018,39(5):68-73.[14] 王倩.不同日光温室结构类型温光特性研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2013.[15] 罗伟.北方不同结构节能日光温室内环境的变化规律[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2015.[16] 吕福虎,杨瑞,李慧霞,等.不同墙体结构和保温方式对日光温室的保温性能测试[J].北方园艺,2020(4):58-64.[17] 曹云娥,张亚红,张学忠,等.宁夏不同结构日光温室的光环境以及对番茄光合效率的影响[J].北方园艺,2011(16):73-76.[18] 白青华,马红勇,殷雪莲,等.低温期不同结构日光温室温度变化及其对樱桃番茄生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2013(22):59-62.[19] 马月虹,李保明,王国强,等.装配式日光温室砌筑不同蓄热墙体的增温和草莓栽培效果[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(15):175-181.[20] 刘传宏,杨凤军,张晓芳.大庆市双膜日光温室保温性能研究[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(20):171-177.[21] 李军,邹志荣,杨旭,等.西北型节能日光温室采光设计中方位角和前屋面角的分析、探讨与应用[J].西北农业学报,2003(2):105-108.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-07-31