|Table of Contents|

Adaptability Evaluation of Different Sweet Cherry Varieties in Solar Greenhouse in Northern Xinjiang

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年08
Page:
38-45
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Adaptability Evaluation of Different Sweet Cherry Varieties in Solar Greenhouse in Northern Xinjiang
Author(s):
ZHANG Jinqiang1; 2; LI Pengcheng1; 2; SU Xuede1; 2; YANG Xiang1; 2; LI Ming1; 2; GUO Shaojie1; 2
(1.Institute of Horticulture,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832000;2.Xinjiang Production & Construction Crop Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm Innovation and Quality Improvement and Efficiency Increment,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832000)
Keywords:
greenhouse; sweet cherry; photosynthetic characteristics; fruit texture; evaluate
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20223443
Abstract:
The photosynthetic and quality characteristics of seven sweet cherry varieties in greenhouse were studied by principal component analysis and cluster analysis,in order to provide reference for the selection of sweet cherry varieties in greenhouse in Northern Xinjiang.The results showed that there were differences in photosynthetic and quality indexes among different varieties of sweet cherry in greenhouse,and the net photosynthetic rate of seven varieties of sweet cherry ranged 11-15 μmol?m-2?s-1.Single fruit weight was 7-10 g.Soluble solids content was 15%-22%.The hardness was 160-290 g.The chewability was 8-19 mJ.The cluster analysis divided the seven varieties into three categories.Through the principal component analysis,four principal components were extracted,and the cumulative variance contribution rate reached 93.33%,which could reflect most of the information of the original indicators.The comprehensive scores of the seven varieties were ranked as follows,‘Tieton’>‘Lapins’>‘Van’>‘Summit’>‘Mingzhu’>‘Zhuangyuanhong’>‘Jiahong’.

References:

[1]纠松涛,徐岩,付朝斌,等.花发育阶段以及温度对不同品种甜樱桃柱头可授性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2020,40(10):1698-1705.[2]王宝刚,李文生,侯玉茹,等.甜樱桃果实成熟过程中糖累积与品质形成研究[J].果树学报,2017,34(5):576-583.[3]PERI P L,ARENA M,PASTUR G M,et al.Photosyn-thetic response to different light intensities,water status and leaf age of two berberis species(Berberidaceae)of Patagonian steppe[J].Ar-gentina Journal of Arid Environments,2011,75:1218-1222.[4]MONCLUS R,DREYER E,VILLAR M,et al.Impact of drought and productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoids × Populus nigra[J].New Phytologist,2005,169:765-777.[5]RAFFO A,SINESIO F,MONETA E,et al.Internal quality of fresh and cold stored celery petioles described by sensory profifile,chemical and instrumental measurements[J].European Food Research and Technology A,2006,222(5/6):590-599.[6]叶志彪.园艺产品品质分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2011.[7]许玲,魏秀清,章希娟,等.质构仪整果穿刺法评价3个毛叶枣品种果实质地参数[J].福建农业学报,2018,33(6):621-625.[8]张素敏,杨巍,王柏松,等.12个甜樱桃品种果实品质特征评价[J].食品研究与开发,2022:43(20):73-82.[9]公丽艳,孟宪军,刘乃侨,等.基于主成分与聚类分析的苹果加工品质评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(13):276-285.[10]高贵宾,钟浩,吴志庄,等.不同混生地被竹光合和荧光特征比较[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2016,45(5):515-521.[11]李士坤.11个樱花品种光合特性比较研究[J].安徽农业科学,2022,50(10):111-114.[12]杨建民,王中英.新红星与红星苹果幼树光合特性研究[J].果树科学,1993(1):1-5.[13]李囡囡.日光温室栽培枣光合特性研究[D].晋中:山西农业大学,2016.[14]郭连金,杜佳朋,吴艳萍,等.香果树实生苗的光合特性及其与环境因子的关系[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(5):1473-1481.[15]张婷,江文,王帅,等.3个樱桃品种叶片解剖结构、色素含量及光合特性的比较[J].天津农学院学报,2014,21(2):24-26.[16]王彬彬,李娜,贾漫丽,等.质构仪检测桑葚质地品质的方法研究[J].果树学报,2021,38(11):2014-2020.[17]姜松,王海鸥.TPA 质构分析及测试条件对苹果 TPA 质构分析的影响[J].食品科学,2004,25(12)：68-71.[18]赵爱玲,薛晓芳,王永康,等.质构仪检测鲜枣果实质地品质的方法研究[J].果树学报,2018,35(5)：113-123.[19]马媛媛,陆玲鸿,古咸彬,等.基于TPA的猕猴桃质地差异分析及贮藏性评价[J].果树学报,2021,38(9):1579-1589.[20]顾秋香,周凌伊,安迪,等.南方高海拔地区栽培甜樱桃质地特性研究[J].保鲜与加工,2019,19(3):44-49.[21]李小胜,陈珍珍.如何正确应用SPSS软件做主成分分析[J].统计研究,2010,27(8):105-108.[22]谢辉,樊丁宇,张雯,等.统计方法在葡萄理化指标简化中的应用[J].新疆农业科学,2011,48(8):1434-1437.[23]杨小翠,詹秋文,刘言龙,等.苏丹草与高梁的判别分析和聚类分析[J].中国草地学报,2016,38(1):41-46.[24]景延秋,袁秀秀,刘英杰,等.河南主产烟区烤烟主流烟气巴豆醛释放量差异及聚类分析[J].中国烟草科学,2016,37(2):54-58.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-05-12