|Table of Contents|

Soil Bacterial Diversity and Function Prediction Analysis of Poria cocos Cultivating Under Different Planting Modes

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年11
Page:
91-97
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Soil Bacterial Diversity and Function Prediction Analysis of Poria cocos Cultivating Under Different Planting Modes
Author(s):
XU Lei12LIU Changli2GUO Lanping1
(1.National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Post-Doctoral Research Station of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700;2.School of Pharmacy,Hubei University of Chinese Medicine,Wuhan,Hubei 430065)
Keywords:
Poria cocoshigh throughput sequencingbacteriacommunity structurediversity
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20223163
Abstract:
Taking the cultivating soil of Poria cocos by different planting modes as experimental materials,using Illumina novaseq high-throughput sequencing technology to study the changes of soil bacterial community before planting and after sclerotium harvest of Poria cocos forest-medicine bionic cultivation and farmland monoculture cultivation.The function of metagenomewas predicted using Tax4fun,in order to provide reference for the suitable cultivation mode and the avoiding continuous cropping mechanism of Poria cocos.The results showed that the number of soil bacterial OTUs increased slightly after two cultivation modes of Poria cocos.Alpha diversity analysis showed that there was no significant difference among Shannon index,Simpson index,Chao1 index and ACE index.The phyla with the highest relative abundance were Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria,Firmicutes,Verrucomicrobia,Crenarchaeota,Actinobacteria,Bacteroidetes,Chloroflexi,Nitrospirae.There was no significant change in the relative abundance of the above-mentioned departments in the farmland monoculture cultivation.In forest-medicine bionic cultivation,the relative abundance of Acidobacteria Verrucomicrobia and Crenarchaeota increased significantly,but did not reach a very significant level.UPGMA cluster analysis showed that the two cultivation patterns were clustered into one category respectively.Tax4fun function prediction was annotated to 6 functions at the first level,the secondary function prediction included 35 sub functions.In summary,the bacterial community structure of Poria cocos cultivated in different models was relatively stable,the number of bacteria increased only a small amount,and the dominant bacterial community did not change significantly.Soil bacteria might not be the main cause of Poria cocos intolerance to continuous cropping.

References:

[1]马艳春,范楚晨,冯天甜,等.茯苓的化学成分和药理作用研究进展[J].中医药学报,2021,49(12):108-111.[2]金剑,钟灿,谢景,等.我国茯苓炮制加工和产品研发现状与展望[J].中国现代中药,2020,22(9):1441-1446.[3]陈卫东,彭慧,王妍妍,等.茯苓药材的历史沿革与变迁[J].中草药,2017,48(23):5032-5038.[4]刘常丽,徐雷,解小霞,等.湖北茯苓生产中存在的主要问题探讨[J].湖北中医药大学学报,2013,15(5):42-44.[5]厉桂香,马克明.土壤微生物多样性海拔格局研究进展[J].生态学报,2018,38(5):1521-1529.[6]YOUSSEF N,SHEIK C S,KRUMHOLZ L R,et al.Comparison of species richness estimates obtained using nearly complete fragments and simulated pyrosequencing-generated fragments in 16S rRNA gene-based environmental surveys[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2009,75(16):5227-5236.[7]HESS M,SCZYRBA A,EGAN R,et al.Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen[J].Science,2011,331(6016):463-467.[8]李丽,蒋景龙.基于高通量测序的西洋参根际土壤细菌群落分析[J].中药材,2019,42(1):7-12.[9]高嵩,孙文松,温健,等.连作龙胆草根际土壤细菌多样性及功能预测分析[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2021,52(1):102-108.[10]周界,李明,徐友阳,等.基于高通量测序的穿心莲连作根际土壤细菌群落多样性分析[J].华南农业大学学报,2021,42(3):55-63.[11]王钰,潘媛,伍晓丽,等.不同种植模式下黄连根际土壤理化特性及细菌群落结构变化[J].中国中药杂志,2021,46(3):582-590.[12]谭勇,崔尹赡,季秀玲,等.三七种植前后土壤细菌群落结构与多样性分析[J].昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版),2016,41(6):92-99.[13]LIGI T,OOPKAUP K,TRUU M,et al.Characterization of bacterial communities in soil and sediment of a created riverine wetland complex using high-throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing[J].Ecological Engineering,2014,72:56-66.[14]JONES R T,ROBESON M S,LAUBER C L,et al.A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses[J].The ISME Journal,2009,3(4):442-453.[15]LAUBER C L,STRICKLAND M S,BRADFORD M A,et al.The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,40(9):2407-2415.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-07-26