|Table of Contents|

Response Characteristics of Rehmannia glutinosa to Drought Stress Under Different Virus-free Treatments

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年07
Page:
111-118
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Response Characteristics of Rehmannia glutinosa to Drought Stress Under Different Virus-free Treatments
Author(s):
LI Meng1; 2; LA Guixiao3; ZHANG Bao1; 2; SU Xiuhong1; 2; DONG Chengming1; 2
(1.College of Pharmacy,Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou,Henan 450046；2.Henan Synergistic Innovation Center of Respiratory Disease Diagnosis and New Drug Development,Zhengzhou,Henan 450046；3.Institute of Economic Crops,Henan Provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou,Henan 450002)
Keywords:
Rehmannia glutinosa; virus-free; PEG 6000; growth; physiological characteristics
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20222933
Abstract:
Taking virus seedlings,shoot tip virus-free seedlings and ‘electric’ therapy virus-free seedlings as experimental materials,the effects of drought stress on morphological characteristics,chlorophyll,relative water content of leaves,osmoregulatory substances and antioxidant enzyme activities of the three materials were studied by simulating drought stress with different concentrations of PEG 6000 (0%,5%,10% and 15%),in order to provide reference for the application and promotion of detoxified groundnut in field cultivation.The results showed that the growth of the three materials was significantly inhibited under PEG 6000 stress.With the extension of rooting days,plant height,rooting number,root length and fresh weight decreased,but the growth of virus-free seedlings obtained by ‘electric’ therapy was the best.With the increase of drought stress,the chlorophyll content of virus-free seedlings obtained by ‘electric’ therapy first decreased and then increased.The virus-free seedlings in shoot tip culture decreased slightly,while the virus-free seedlings showed a downward,upward and then downward trend.The relative water content of leaves decreased gradually.The contents of soluble sugar,soluble protein,and activities of CAT,SOD and POD showed a continuous upward trend with the deepening of stress,and the content of virus-free seedlings treated with ‘electric’ therapy was the highest.Therefore,the ‘electric’ treatment of virus-free seedlings had strong drought resistance,which could provide a demonstration reference for the study of drought resistance mechanism and field cultivation of Rehmannia glutinosa.

References:

[1]张晓丽,李萍,周彩云,等.怀地黄脱毒种苗大田生长性状及产量品质[J].植物学报,2017,52(4)：474-479.[2]苏秀红,腊贵晓,刘春朝,等.怀地黄脱毒技术的优选[J].植物生理学报,2022,58(3)：587-595.[3]ABID U,MOHAMMAD N,HAZRAT A,et al.Drought tolerance improvement in plants：An endophytic bacterial approach[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2019,103:7385-7397.[4]项洪涛,李琬,何宁,等.外源脱落酸（ABA）调节植物抗旱机制的研究进展[J].东北农业科学,2022,47(5):37-41.[5]田梦平,谢小龙,杜权,等.16份怀地黄种质资源抗旱性评价[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(21)：153-159.[6]左静静,闫贵云,霍利光,等.脱毒地黄试管苗的微扦插快繁技术研究[J].中药材,2020,43(1)：20-23.[7]陈明霞,赵喜亭,李明军,等.多效唑对脱毒怀地黄光合生理和抗性生理的影响[J].北方园艺,2014(22)：158-161.[8]丁明珠,邓竹根,胡克玲,等.蜜薯的脱毒培养及脱毒苗的生理变化[J].安徽农业大学学报,2021,48(4):560-568.[9]郑小燕,郑柯强,陈巍.脱毒马铃薯的增产潜力及抗逆性试验初探[J].福建农业科技,2010(5)：36-38.[10]石欣隆,杨月琴,薛娴,等.壳寡糖对干旱胁迫下‘凤丹’幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(2):120-126.[11]李合生．现代植物生理学：植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M].3版.北京：高等教育出版社,2010．[12]高昆,石义妃.干旱胁迫对粉葛幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(8)：153-157.[13]张雕,刘敏婕,刘卫东,等.干旱胁迫对‘菊花桃’幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].经济林研究,2021,39(1):211-219.[14]李经纬.马铃薯茎尖与病毒超低温保存技术的研究及超低温疗法脱毒试管苗的耐盐性评价[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.[15]杨喜珍,杨利,覃亚,等.PEG-8000模拟干旱胁迫对马铃薯组培苗叶绿素和类胡萝卜素含量的影响[J].中国马铃薯,2019,33(4):193-202.[16]邓珍,徐建飞,段绍光,等.PEG-8000模拟干旱胁迫对 11个马铃薯品种的组培苗生长指标的影响[J].华北农学报,2014(5)：99-106.[17]文爱华,刘济明,高攀,等.自然干旱胁迫对米槁幼苗叶片显微 结构及叶绿素含量的影响[J].北方园艺,2015(14)：62-66.[18]戴海根,董文科,柴澍杰,等.模拟干旱胁迫下鹰嘴紫云英幼苗生长及生理特性[J].中国草地学报,2021,43(10):63-75.[19]陈彦云,李紫辰,曹君迈,等.马铃薯脱毒苗对NaCl胁迫的响应及耐盐性评价[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(10):2052-2059.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-05-04