|Table of Contents|

Spatial Distribution and Driving Forces of Total Nitrogen in Wetland Soil in Yanbian Prefecture，Jilin Province

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年06
Page:
62-70
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Spatial Distribution and Driving Forces of Total Nitrogen in Wetland Soil in Yanbian Prefecture，Jilin Province
Author(s):
ZONG Jin1; 2; JIN Ri1; 2; JIN Xuemei1; ZHU Weihong1; 2; YUAN Lin1; 2; WANG Jingzhi1; 2
(1.School of Geography and Ocean Sciences,Yanbian University，Hunchun，Jilin 133002;2.Changbai Mountain Wetland Ecosystem Function and Ecological Security Key Laboratory of Jilin Province,Hunchun，Jilin 133002)
Keywords:
wetland; total soil nitrogen; spatial heterogeneity; spatial distribution; driving force analysis; geostatistics
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20222382
Abstract:
The soil total nitrogen (TN) in meadow swamp wetlands,river wetlands,forested swamp wetlands and reservoir artificial wetlands in Yanbian Prefecture,Jilin Province was used as test materials,and soil TN spatial heterogeneity and driving forces in meadow swamp wetlands,river wetlands,forested swamp wetlands and reservoir artificial wetlands in Yanbian Prefecture,Jilin Province were studied by using semi-covariance function,ordinary kriging interpolation and factor detector,in order to provide reference for evaluating wetland soil fertility and soil TN heterogeneity and driving forces in wetlands.The results showed that the soil TN content of forest swamp wetlands in Yanbian Prefecture was the highest；among the different wetland types，except for river wetlands，the soil TN content in Wangqing county showed the highest value；among the spatial correlations，the soil TN content of river wetlands showed moderate spatial correlations，while other types of wetlands showed strong spatial correlations；however，meadow swamp wetlands and reservoir artificial wetlands had a larger spatial self.The main driving factor for changing soil TN content in meadow swamp wetlands and reservoir man-made wetlands was elevation，while in the rest of the wetland types it was population density.The results of this study provided an important basis for the management，protection and governance of wetland ecosystems.

References:

[1]ZHAO R，ZHAO M，ZHANG L，et al.An approach to the use of plants for monitoring soil conditions in wetlands in arid areas[J].CATENA，2021，199:105113.[2]佘国强,陈扬乐.湿地生态系统的结构和功能[J].湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版),1997(3):77-81.[3]常运华,刘学军,李凯辉,等.大气氮沉降研究进展[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(6):972-979.[4]李朝英,郑路.流动分析仪同时快速测定植物全氮、全磷含量的方法改进[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021(2):336-342.[5]马坤,张颖,唐素贤,等.若尔盖高寒湿地土壤全氮空间分布特征[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(8):1988-1995.[6]王青,袁勇,李传哲,等.白洋淀湿地土壤氮素空间分布特征研究[J].环境保护科学,2013,39(4):1-6.[7]王勇辉.艾比湖湿地七种植被类型土壤全氮分布特征研究[J].土壤通报,2017,48(2):413-419.[8]余璐,白军红,于子博,等.东营港附近排水湿地土壤全氮和微生物量氮的含量和储量[J].湿地科学,2019,17(5):600-606.[9]QI Q，ZHANG D，ZHANG M，et al.Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in disturbed Carex tussock wetland[J].Ecological Indicators，2021，120:106930.[10]杨帆.莱州湾滨海湿地人类活动强度及其生态效应[D].青岛:青岛理工大学,2018.[11]王玲玲,孙志高,牟晓杰,等.黄河口滨岸潮滩不同类型湿地土壤氮素分布特征[J].土壤通报,2011,42(6):1439-1445.[12]卜晓燕,米文宝,许浩,等.宁夏平原不同类型湿地土壤碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量学特征[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2016,42(1):107-118.[13]沈亲.兰陵溪小流域茶园坡面养分分布特征与空间异质性[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2011.[14]周洋,赵小敏,郭熙,等.基于地理探测器的寻乌县土壤微量元素影响因子分析[J].核农学报,2021,35(6):1420-1432.[15]李洪楠,朱卫红,佟守正,等.延边朝鲜族自治州湿地时空分布特征[J].湿地科学,2011,9(3):257-262.[16]杨亮,朱卫红,吴婷婷,等.延边朝鲜族自治州农田土壤肥力综合评价[J].河南科学,2017,35(9):1439-1444.[17]韩旭龙.基于生态系统服务的延边朝鲜族自治州土地利用优化研究[D].延边:延边大学,2020.[18]尼格德力?欧优图.全氮含量检测方法研究进展[J].农家参谋,2021(14):188-189.[19]张洪钒.半参数模型的相关研究[D].成都:电子科技大学,2018.[20]汤国安,杨昕.ArcGIS地理信息系统空间分析实验教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.[21]王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.[22]赵晓芳,黄明斌.黄土高原王东沟小流域土壤表层氮的空间分布[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(4):62-67.[23]李跃林,彭少麟.桉树人工林地土壤酶活性与营养元素含量关系研究[J].福建林业科技,2002(3):6-9,29.[24]魏江生,于海涛,周梅,等.兴安落叶松林林下土壤中全氮分布规律的研究[C].临沂：海峡两岸环境与资源学术研讨会，2007.[25]LOOMIS M J，CRAFT C B.Carbon sequestration and nutrient (nitrogen，phosphorus) accumulation in river-dominated tidal marshes，Georgia，USA[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal，2010，74(3):1028-1036.[26]田昆.云南纳帕海高原湿地土壤退化过程及驱动机制[D].北京：中国科学院研究生院（东北地理与农业生态研究所）,2004.[27]胡玉福,邓良基,肖海华,等.邛海盆地土壤氮素空间变异特征与影响因素研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(4):132-140.[28]于连海.坝上闪电河湿地草本植物群落空间分布及环境解释[D].保定：河北农业大学,2018.[29]李娜娜,高飞,魏圣钊,等.四川省湿地类型变化的自然-社会经济驱动力分析[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5502-5512.[30]许中旗,闵庆文,王英舜,等.人为干扰对典型草原生态系统土壤养分状况的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006(5):38-42.[31]张巧明,王得祥,龚明贵,等.秦岭火地塘林区不同海拔森林土壤理化性质[J].水土保持学报，2011,25(5):69-73.[32]WALDROP M P，ZAK D R，SINSABAUGH R L,et al.Nitrogen deposition modifies soil carbon storage through changes in microbial enzymatic activity[J].Ecological Applications，2004，14(4):1172-1177.[33]张兴昌,刘国彬,付会芳.不同植被覆盖度对流域氮素径流流失的影响[J].环境科学,2000(6):16-19.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-04-13