|Table of Contents|

Study on Differences of Photosynthetic and FluorescenceCharacteristics of Grape in Different Cultivation Areas

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年24
Page:
24-32
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on Differences of Photosynthetic and FluorescenceCharacteristics of Grape in Different Cultivation Areas
Author(s):
XIE Hui1; ZHU Xuehui2; BAI Shijian3; MA Yunlong4; NIU Qian2; ZHANG Wen1
(1.Institute of Horticultural Crops，Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Urumqi,Xinjiang 830091；2.College of Forestry and Horticulture，Xinjiang Agricultural University，Urumqi,Xinjiang 830052；3.Grape，Melon and Fruit Research Center,Shanshan，Xinjiang 838200；4.School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering，Xinjiang Agricultural University，Urumqi,Xinjiang 830052)
Keywords:
different ecological environment; red grapes; photosynthetic characteristics; fluorescence characteristics
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20221705
Abstract:
Two 9-year-old red grape varieties ‘Xinyu’ and ‘Hongti’ were used as experimental materials，and the photosynthetic indexes and fluorescence parameters were measured by LI-6400 and FMS-2，and the changes of photosynthetic characteristics of grapes in different ecological environments were analyzed.Through the study on the difference of photosynthetic characteristics of two red grape varieties under different ecological environment conditions，the adaptability of two red grape varieties to the ecological environment was clarified,in order to provide reference for field production.The results showed that under the grape trellis，the annual maximum temperature，high temperature duration and light time in Shanshan were higher than those in Urumqi.The maximum temperature in Shanshan was 42.5 ℃，the maximum temperature in Urumqi was only 38 ℃，and the days when the daily maximum temperature was higher than 35 ℃ were 86 days and 20 days respectively.The PAR value in Urumqi was higher than that in Shanshan.The highest values in Urumqi and Shanshan were 1 822 μmol·m-2·s-1 and 1 975.5 μmol·m-2·s-1 respectively.Under different ecological environment conditions，the diurnal variation of leaf net photosynthetic rate of the two red grape varieties showed a bimodal curve，and the overall trend in Shanshan area was higher than that in Urumqi area.At 10:00 am，the diurnal variation of net photosynthetic rate of ‘Hongti’ grape was 23.75 μmol·m-2·s-1 in Shanshan area，significantly higher than 13.55 μmol·m-2·s-1 in Urumqi.The value of ‘Xinyu’ grape in Shanshan area was 16.6 μmol·m-2·s-1，lower than that in Urumqi.Light saturation point，dark respiration rate，quantum efficiency,the equivalent values of ΦPSⅡ and ETR were higher than those in Urumqi，and the values of Pmax，qP and NPQ in Urumqi were better than those in Shanshan.

References:

[1]吴久赟,徐桂香,李海峰,等.高温胁迫对葡萄叶绿素荧光和光合特性参数的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2021,58(12):2274-2281.[2]吴久赟,廉苇佳,刘志刚,等.不同葡萄品种叶绿素荧光参数的高温响应及其耐热性评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(6):80-88.[3]宋薇.喀什地区新郁葡萄栽培技术[J].农村科技,2016(9):51-52.[4]郑秋玲.温度胁迫对葡萄生长的影响及叶面肥喷布效应[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2010.[5]贺普超,牛立新.我国葡萄属野生种抗寒性的研究[J].园艺学报,1989(2)：81-88.[6]卞凤娥,孙永江,牛彦杰,等.高温胁迫下根施褪黑素对葡萄叶片叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].植物生理学报,2017,53(2)：257-263.[7]吴春燕,简慰民,邵敏兰.中国葡萄气候区划探讨[J].新疆气象,2000(4)：13-15.[8]吴韶辉,蔡妙珍,石学根.高温对植物叶片光合作用的抑制机理[J].现代农业科技,2010(15):16-18.[9]罗海波.葡萄光合作用对高温胁迫响应机理的初步研究[D].北京：中国科学院研究生院,2010.[10]李晨,李秀杰,韩真,等.非生物胁迫对葡萄光合作用的影响研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2017,49(12)：146-148.[11]WAHID A,GELANI S,ASHRAF M,et al.Heat tolerance in plants：An overview[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany.2007,61(3)：199-223.[12]孙永江,杜远鹏,翟衡.高温胁迫下不同光强对‘赤霞珠’葡萄PSⅡ活性及恢复的影响[J].植物生理学报,2014,50(8)：1209-1215.[13]孙永江,付艳东,杜远鹏,等.不同温度/光照组合对‘赤霞珠’葡萄叶片光系统Ⅱ功能的影响[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(6):1191-1200.[14]王海波,王孝娣,史祥宾,等.葡萄不同品种对设施环境的适应性[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(6)：1213-1220.[15]吴月燕.高温胁迫对藤稔葡萄生长结果的影响[J].果树学报,2001，18(5)：280-283.[16]查倩,奚晓军,蒋爱丽,等.高温胁迫对葡萄幼树叶绿素荧光特性和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].植物生理学报,2016,52(4)：525-532.[17]周兴本,刘士冲,郭修武,等.不同水分条件下无核白鸡心葡萄光合日变化[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(12)：182-184.[18]MA W,NIU Y Y,LUO Q W,et al.Difference of photosynthetic characteristics between greenhouse and open-field grapes in Turpan[J].Agricultural Science & Technology,2016,17(6): 1285-1288.[19]罗树伟,郭春会,张国庆.神木与杨凌地区长柄扁桃光合与生物学特性比较[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(5)：196-202.[20]王明,张成超,杜远鹏.喷施高岭土对高温和强光胁迫下福克葡萄叶片光合特性的影响[J].中国果树,2022(1):57-61,67.[21]肖芳.高温胁迫对苗期红提葡萄生理及基因表达特性的影响[D].南京:南京信息工程大学,2018.[22]牛倩.不同栽培区域对无核白鸡心和无核翠宝葡萄生理及品质特性影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2021.[23]李雅善,李华,徐成东,等.不同灌溉条件下葡萄叶片光合特性研究[J].北方园艺,2015(14):1-6.[24]许大全.光合作用效率[D].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2020.[25]吴久赟,徐桂香,李海峰,等.高温胁迫对葡萄叶绿素荧光和光合特性参数的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2021,58(12):2274-2281.[26]郑秋玲,谭伟,马宁,等.钙对高温下巨峰葡萄叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光的影响[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(9)：1963-1968.[27]JIA Y,LIAO K,MA W,et al.Comparison of photosynthetic and fluorescence characteristics of different grape varieties under high temperature and strong light in Turpan[J].Agricultural Science & Technology,2015,16(5):868-872.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-01-22