|Table of Contents|

Effects of IBA on the Cuttage Propagation of Young Hard Shoots of Paeonia delavayi Under Different Substrates

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年23
Page:
74-82
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of IBA on the Cuttage Propagation of Young Hard Shoots of Paeonia delavayi Under Different Substrates
Author(s):
LIU Zirong1; PING Huailei2; PU Yan2; YU Xiao1; DAI Manting1; WANG Juan3
(1.College of Horticulture，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming，Yunnan 650224；2.College of Forestry，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming,Yunnan 650224;3.Green Development Research Institute，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming,Yunnan 650224)
Keywords:
Paeonia delavayi; cutting propagation; concentration of IBA; substrate
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20221491
Abstract:
Young shoots (buds that sprout at the base of seedlings) and hard shoots (stem segments with sprouts) of perennial healthy and disease-free Paeonia delavayi were used as test materials.The effects of plant growth regulator IBA concentration，substrate type and IBA soaking time on the propagation of P.delavayi tender and hard cuttings were studied by three-factor and three-stage orthogonal experiment,in order to provide reference for the large-scale production of P.delavayi.The results showed that the effect of tender cuttings of P.delavayi was obvious.In the tender shoots test,after soaking in 100.0 mg·L-1 IBA for 1 hour the cutting effect was the best when the substrate ratio of coconut bran and peat was 4∶6.And the cuttings had second best effect grown in the same substrate after 200.0 mg·L-1IBA soaking for 0.5 hour.The substrate had a significant effect on the rooting and root points of P.delavayi tender branches.IBA hormone concentration and soaking time only had significant effects on the survival rate of tender wood cuttings and the average number of root points，but had no significant effect on other indicators.The primary and secondary effect analysis results indicated the substrate was the most important factor affecting the rooting and rooting of the twig cuttings，followed by the IBA hormone concentration，and the effect of soaking time was the least.The optimal treatment for the propagation of softwood cuttings was 100 mg·L-1 IBA soaking for 1 hour and then grownin the coconut bran∶peat 4∶6 matrix.This treatment could get the highest rooting rate and the longest root.

References:

[1]李奎.滇牡丹保护生物学与遗传多样性研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2013.[2]洪德元,周世良,何兴金,等.野生牡丹的生存状况和保护[J].生物多样性,2017,25(7):781-793.[3]孙金金,李苏雨.云南省野生滇牡丹生境调查及结实能力探究[J].南方农业,2017,11(3):105-106.[4]洪德元,潘开玉．芍药属牡丹组的分类历史和分类处理[J]．植物分类学报,1999,37(4):35l-368．[5]龚洵,潘跃芝,杨志云．滇牡丹的多样性和现状评估[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(2):218-223.[6]任秀霞,张盈,薛璟祺,等.滇牡丹天然居群的遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2015,16(4):772-780.[7]刘开庆,丁开宇.滇牡丹开花特性的观察[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(14):5879-5880.[8]李奎,郑宝强,王雁,等.滇牡丹的开花特征及繁育系统[J].东北林业大学学报,2013,41(1):63-67.[9]杨海岩,王莲英,袁涛.滇牡丹及其天然杂交种种子快速萌发的研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(6):74-77.[10]潘温文,李伟,谭芮,等.不同处理对滇牡丹种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].西部林业科学,2014,43(2):48-52.[11]李奎,郑宝强,王雁,等.40个野生滇牡丹群体的花粉形态研究[J]．北京林业大学学报,2011,33(1):94-103.[12]成仿云,李嘉珏.中国野生牡丹自然繁殖特性研究[J].园艺学报,1997,24(2)：180-184.[13]史倩倩,王雁,周琳,等.生根粉及不同基质对牡丹传统品种扦插的影响[J].北方园艺,2012(1):91-96.[14]成仿云．园林苗圃学[M].北京:中国林业出版社2012．[15]郭素娟,林木扦插生根的解剖学及生理学研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,1997,19(4):64-69.[16]扈红军,曹帮华,尹伟伦,等.不同处理对欧榛硬枝扦插生根的影响及生根过程中相关氧化酶活性的变化[J].林业科学,2007,43(12):70-75.[17]张乐华,王书胜,单文,等.基质、激素种类及其浓度对鹿角杜鹃扦插育苗的影响[J].林业科学,2014，50(3):45-54.[18]李柠,曹福亮,李强,等.枫杨硬枝扦插生根的研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(10):1-8.[19]王书胜,单文,张乐华,等.基质和IBA浓度对云锦杜鹃扦插生根的影响[J].林业科学,2015,51(9):165-172.[20]陈丽英,祁树安,王开芳,等.激素种类、浓度及浸泡时间对红榉扦插育苗的影响[J].山东农业科学,2018,50(8):72-76.[21]田雪邻,史彦江,宋锋惠,等.不同处理对平欧杂种榛黄化萌条扦插生根的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(1):126-132.[22]李悦怡,巴春影,谭智文,等.不同基质与生长素处理对长白山笃斯越桔嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J].延边大学农学学报,2014,36(4):291-296.[23]孔雨光,燕丽萍,吴德军,等.基质和生长调节剂对紫椴嫩枝扦插的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2020,40(6):25-33.[24]王有兵,徐 斌,张方秋,等.不同基质对杜鹃红山茶扦插生根的影响[J].广东林业科技，2011,27(2):54-58.[25]闫海霞,关世凯,周锦业,等.基于正交实验的大根报春苣苔扦插影响因素优化[J].南方农业学报,2019,50(11):2519-2524.[26]张沛健,高丽琼,尚秀华.不同激素种类、浓度及浸泡时间对金蒲桃扦插生根的影响[J].热带作物学报,2020,41(6):1084-1091.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-01-20