|Table of Contents|

Response of Growth and Physiology of Eurohypnum leptothallum to the Degree of Shading

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年20
Page:
56-65
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Response of Growth and Physiology of Eurohypnum leptothallum to the Degree of Shading
Author(s):
LI Changji; WANG Xiurong; YANG Shuoyuan; CHEN Hongmei; SHI Bingyang
(Forestry College,Guizhou University,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025)
Keywords:
shade; Eurohypnum leptothallum; physiological index; growth index
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20221182
Abstract:
Taking Eurohypnum leptothallum as test material,the effects of different shade levels on growth indexes (coverage,stem length) and physiological indexes (chlorophyll content,protective enzyme activity,MDA content,etc.) of shading treatment were studied with shading net,in order to provide reference for the cultivation and application of E.leptothallum.The results showed that the treatments with different shading degrees had very significant effects on the growth indexes and physiological indexes.The most suitable light intensity for the growth and development of E.leptothallum was about 1 060.17-2 763.83 lx.Too high or too low light intensity would inhibit it,and extremely high light would even lead to death.Correlation analysis showed that POD activity was significantly negatively correlated with cover,length,CAT,chlorophyll content,and significantly positively correlated with soluble protein content,so most of the information of growth physiological indicators under shading treatment could be represented by POD,and POD,SOD,CAT activity,soluble protein content,coverage,length and chlorophyll content could be used as the main indicators to study the response of E.leptothallum to environmental changes.In practice,it was recommended to use three layers of shading nets (black 4-pin type) for shading in summer,and two layers of shading nets for shading in autumn.

References:

[1]熊源新.贵州苔藓植物志[M].贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2014.[2]朱瑞良,王幼芳,熊李虎.苔藓植物研究进展Ⅰ.我国苔藓植物研究现状与展望[J].西北植物学报,2002(2):236-243.[3]吴玉环,黄国宏,高谦,等.苔藓植物对环境变化的响应及适应性研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2001(6):943-946.[4]DILKS T J K,PROCTOR M C F.Comparative experiments on temperature responses of bryophytes:Assimilation,respiration and freezing damage[J].Journal of Bryology,2013,8(3):317-336.[5]HE X L,KATE S H,JAAKKO H.Will bryophytes survive in a warming world[J].Perspectives in Plant Ecology,Evolution and Systematics,2016,19:49-60.[6]包维楷,冷俐.相同环境下3种藓类植物光合色素含量的比较[J].植物资源与环境学报,2005(3):53-54.[7]莫惠芝,骆华容,刘建华,等.不同光照条件对三种苔藓植物光合特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2018(15):85-91.[8]杜宝明,张楠,季梦成.苔藓植物的繁殖栽培研究进展[J].江苏林业科技,2011,18(2):44-48.[9]秦伟,朱清科,张学霞,等.植被覆盖度及其测算方法研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006(9):163-170.[10]王学奎,黄见良.植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2015.[11]王春.喷播苔藓结皮培育恢复技术研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.[12]夏定久,李志国,吴昊,等.美灰藓繁殖栽培技术的研究[J].林业科学研究,1989(5):495-500.[13]李倩.几种观赏苔藓植物对水体环境的适应和组织培养研究[D].上海:上海师范大学,2013.[14]李茹雪.撒播苔藓结皮培育恢复技术研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.[15]张军,束文圣.植物对重金属镉的耐受机制[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2006(1):1-8.[16]包斯日古冷,斯琴巴特尔,田桂泉,等.渗透胁迫对直叶灰藓活性氧代谢的影响[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),2011,40(1):68-73.[17]孙俊峰.基质和遮荫与真藓群落繁殖效果的关系研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2005.[18]陈文佳.细叶小羽藓（Haplocladium microphyllum）快繁体系及对逆境的生理响应研究[D].杭州:浙江农林大学,2012.[19]VASHISTHA B D,CHOPRA R N.In vitro studies on spore germination,protonemal differentiation and bud formation in three Himalayan mosses[J].Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory,1987,62:121-136.[20]van der HOEVEN E C,KORPORAAL M,van GESTEL E.Effects of simulated shade on growth,morphology and competitive interactions in two pleurocarpous mosses[J].Journal of Bryology,1998,20(2):301-310.[21]樊晓旭,杜泽萱,柴淑丽,等.光强胁迫下六种苔藓植物的叶绿素荧光动力学响应差异[J].北方园艺,2018(20):84-90.[22]孙守琴,王根绪,罗辑,等.苔藓植物对环境变化的响应和适应性[J].西北植物学报,2009,29(11):2360-2365.[23]XU S J,YIN C S,HE M,et al.A technology for rapid reconstruction of moss-dominated soil crusts[J].Environmental Engineering Science,2008,25(8):1129-1138.[24]刘俊华,包维楷,李芳兰.青藏高原东部原始林下地表主要苔藓斑块特征及其影响因素[J].生态环境,2005(5):735-741.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-12-21