|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Light Qualities on Sucrose Metabolism and Related Enzyme Activities in vitro Plantlets of Paeonia suffruticosa

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年13
Page:
79-86
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Light Qualities on Sucrose Metabolism and Related Enzyme Activities in vitro Plantlets of Paeonia suffruticosa
Author(s):
SHANG Wenqian1ZHANG Chunling1HE Songlin12JI Siyu3WANG Zheng14SHI Liyun1
(1.College of Landscape Architecture and Art,Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450002;2.College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture,Henan University of Science and Technology,Xinxiang,Henan 453003;3.Zhengzhou Jingwei Plaza,Zhengzhou,Henan 450007;4.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Functional Genomics of Resource Plants,Shanghai 201602)
Keywords:
Paeonia suffruticosalight qualitysugar metabolismin vitro
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20220358
Abstract:
Paeonia suffruticosa ‘Luoyanghong’ was used as experimental material,and different LED light sources (red light (658 nm),blue light (461 nm),green light (520 nm),yellow light (596 nm) and common fluorescent lamp (CK)) were used to study the effects of different light qualities on the growth,sugar metabolism and related enzyme activities of Paeonia suffruticosa in vitro, in order to provide reference for improving the quality of Paeonia suffruticosa in vitro.The results showed that overall growth of test-tube seedlings were better under red light,the fresh weights (total,stem,leaf) and dry weights (total,leaf) were the highest under blue light treatment,the stem dry weight was the highest under red light treatment,and the leaf fresh weight and total fresh weight were the lowest in the yellow light treatment.The fresh weight (stem) and dry weights (total,stem and leaf) were the lowest under the CK treatment,the total fresh weight was higher in the green light treatment than in the red light treatment,and the total dry weight was the opposite.The contents of soluble sugar,sucrose and fructose were the highest under red light treatment,and glucose was the highest under blue light treatment.The activities of sucrose synthase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) were both highest in the red light treatment,and the activities of SS and SPS were lower under green light treatment and yellow light treatment.The activities of acid invertase (AI) and neutral invertase (NI) were the highest under blue light treatment,AI activity was the lowest under red light treatment,and NI activity was the lowest under yellow light treatment.In conclusion,it showed that blue light treatment was beneficial to the dry and fresh weight of Paeonia suffruticosa in vitro;red light treatment increased the contents of soluble sugar,sucrose and fructose,and blue light treatment increased the glucose content;yellow light was unfavorable to the growth of test tube seedlings;the changes of dry and fresh weight of green light treatment and red light treatment were probably related to the high activity of SS and SPS and low activity of AI and NI under red light treatment,which led to the increase of sucrose content and thus dry weight.

References:

[1]李岩,文莲莲,焦娟,等.不同转红光棚膜对甜椒光合特性及果实品质的影响[J].植物生理学报,2017,53(12):2147-2156.[2]CHANG S,LI C,YAO X,et al.Morphological,photosynthetic,and physiological responses of rapeseed leaf to different combinations of red and blue lights at the rosette stage[J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2016,7(771):1144-1156.[3]张涛.不同LED光质和组配对叶用莴苣生理基础及营养品质的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2018.[4]CHEN X L,YANG Q C.Effects of intermittent light exposure with red and blue light emitting diodes on growth and carbohydrate accumulation of lettuce[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2018,234:220-226.[5]CHOI H G,MOON B Y,KANG N J,Effects of LED light on the production of strawberry during cultivation in a plastic greenhouse and in a growth chamber[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2015,189:22-31.[6]陈晓丽,杨其长,张馨,等.LED绿光补光模式对生菜生长及品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(21):4170-4177.[7]许大全,高伟,阮军.光质对植物生长发育的影响[J].植物生理学报,2015,51(8):1217-1234.[8]ROOK F,HADINGHAM S A,LI Y,et al.Sugar and ABA response pathways and the control of gene expression[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2006,29(3):426-434.[9]耿艳秋,董肖昌,张春梅.园艺作物糖转运蛋白研究进展[J].园艺学报,2021,48(4):676-688.[10]靳晓白,成仿云,张启翔.国际栽培植物命名法规[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2013.[11]BERUTO M,LANTERI L,PORTOGALLO C.Micropropagation of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa)[J].Plant Cell,Tissue and Organ Culture,2004,79(2):249-255.[12]贺丹,王政,何松林.牡丹试管苗生根过程解剖结构观察及相关激素与酶变化的研究[J].园艺学报,2011,38(4):770-776.[13]张志良,瞿伟菁,李小方.植物生理学实验指导.4版[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2009.[14]江明艳,潘远智.不同光质对盆栽一品红光合特性及生长的影响[J].园艺学报,2006,33(2):338-343.[15]刘卫成,韦峰,韩泽宇,等.不同光质对黄瓜种子发芽、幼苗生长及抗寒性的影响[J].北方园艺,2016(19):59-62.[16]谢以萍,杨再强,苏天星,等.不同光质对瓜叶菊生长发育的影响[J].北方园艺,2010(3):53-56.[17]邵久之,韩杜斌,陈向荣,等.蓝光对黄瓜苗期形态和生理特性的影响[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2021,42(5):92-96,110.[18]王晓晶.LED绿光对蔬菜生长及品质的影响[D].太原:山西农业大学,2019.[19]刘敏玲.LED不同光质对金线莲生理特征及品质的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2013.[20]GUPTA S D,KUMAR A,AGARWAL A.Impact of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on the growth and morphogenesis of encapsulated shoot buds of Curculigo orchioides Gaertn.an endangered medicinal herb[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2019,41(4):50.[21]张曼曼,赵晓红,魏宗法,等.LED不同光质对观赏海棠组培苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].山东农业科学,2018,50(10):43-47.[22]查凌雁,刘文科.不同光强下红蓝光配比对樱桃萝卜生长与产量的影响[J].中国农业气象,2018,39(3):162-167.[23]ZHU M,GENG S,CHAKRAVORTY D,et al.Metabolomics of red-light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis thaliana:Coupling with abscisic acid and jasmonic acid metabolism[J].The Plant Journal,2020,101:1331-1348.[24]宋莹.不同光质对刺五加生理代谢影响[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2021.[25]凌丹丹,雒佳铭,刘晓英,等.不同光质及组合对番茄开花初期碳氮代谢及其关键酶活性的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2021,44(4):622-627.[26]孙娜,魏珉,李岩,等.光质对番茄幼苗碳氮代谢及相关酶活性的影响[J].园艺学报,2016,43(1):80-88.[27]HUANG Y W,NIE Y X,WAN Y Y,et al.Exogenous glucose regulates activities of antioxidant enzyme,soluble acid invertase and neutral invertase and alleviates dehydration stress of cucumber seedlings[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2013,162:20-30.[28]CHEN X L,WANG L C,LI T,et al.Sugar accumulation and growth of lettuce exposed to different lighting modes of red and blue LED light[J].Scientific Reports,2019,9(1):6926.[29]孙娜.光质对番茄生长、生理代谢及果实产量品质的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2015.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-08-31