|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Greenhouse Cabbage

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年14
Page:
86-92
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Greenhouse Cabbage
Author(s):
TAO Jiale1LI Yuefei1LI Bin1QI Shigang2CHENG Fangmei2GAO Xueshuang2
(1.Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Suyu District,Suqian,Jiangsu 223800;2.Suqian Agricultural Technology Comprehensive Service Center,Suqian,Jiangsu 223800)
Keywords:
soil amendmentsoil physicochemical propertiessoil enzyme activitycabbageyield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20220157
Abstract:
The effects of four kinds of soil amendments on soil enzyme activity,soil nutrients,soil ion components and cabbage yield of continuous cropping cabbage were studied by greenhouse cultivation with rice bran,soil stubble agent,bio-organic fertilizer and fulvic acid as test materials,in order to screen out suitable soil improvement measures for soil types in Suqian facilities.The results showed that compared with the control,the activities of sucrase,urease,catalase and peroxidase of bio-organic fertilizers increased by 52.44%,31.00%,17.59% and 85.08%,respectively,and the activity of polyphenol oxidase decreased 8.40%.The soil organic matter content of rice bran,bio-organic fertilizer and cabbage before planting was significantly higher than other treatments.The contents of available nitrogen and available phosphorus in the soil treated with bio-organic fertilizer were 31.38% and 44.95% higher than other treatments on average,respectively,and the contents of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen were significantly higher than those of other treatments,which were about 2 times that of the control.The application of organic fertilizer significantly increased the K+ content in the soil by 42.27%.Compared with the control,the amendments significantly reduced soil anion content;four kinds of soil improvement measures could improve the dry and fresh weight of cabbage leaf ball,scattered leaves and roots at maturity to varying degrees,thereby increasing the yield of cabbage.The yield of each treatment was in the order of bio-organic fertilizer>rice bran>soil stubble agent>fulvic acid>control.In summary,the application of bio-organic fertilizer was the most ideal for improving secondary salinization of facility soil and alleviating continuous cropping obstacles.

References:

[1]LIANG L,OUTT B G,LAL R,et al.Nitrogen footprint and nitrogen use efficiency of greenhouse tomato production in North China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,208:285-296.[2]李萨利,祁石刚,张鑫.宿迁市设施蔬菜连作障碍情况及主要治理措施[J].长江蔬菜,2021(18):29-33.[3]TIAN K,HU WY,XING Z,et al.Determination and evaluation of heavy metals in soils under two different greenhouse vegetable production systems in Eastern China[J].Chemosphere,2016,165:555-563.[4]余海英,李廷轩,张锡洲.温室栽培系统的养分平衡及土壤养分变化特征[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(3):514-522.[5]CHEN Y,HUANG B,HU W Y,et al.Environmental assessment of closed greenhouse vegetable production system in Nanjing,China[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2013,13(8):1418-1429.[6]LI S,LEI Y D,ZHANG Y Y,et al.Rational trade-offs between yield increase and fertilizer inputs are essential for sustainable intensification:A case study in wheat-maize cropping systems in China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,679:328-336.[7]RAUN W R,JOHNSON G V.Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production[J].Agronomy Journal,1999,91:357-363.[8]HE F,CHEN Q,JIANG R,et al.Yield and nitrogen balance of greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) with conventional and site-specific nitrogen management in Northern China[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2007,77(1):1-14.[9]MIN J,ZHAO X,SHI W M,et al.Nitrogen balance and loss in a greenhouse vegetable system in Southeastern China[J].Pedosphere,2007,21(4):464-472.[10]ZIKELI S,DEIL L,MOLLER K.The challenge of imbalanced nutrient flows in organic farming systems:A study of organic greenhouses in Southern Germany[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2017,244:1-13.[11]申卫收,林先贵.三种不同利用方式土壤上黄瓜根际微生物群落差异[J].土壤学报,2011,48(3):654-658.[12]SONG Y,XU M,LI X,et al.Long-term plastic greenhouse cultivation changes soil microbial community structures:A case study[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2018,66(34):8941-8948.[13]HAO Z,CHEN B,LI X.Relationship between soil chemical properties and microbial metabolic patterns in intensive greenhouse tomato production systems[J].Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science,2020,66(10):1334-1343.[14]许晓平,汪有科,冯浩,等.土壤改良剂改土培肥增产效应研究综述[J].中国农学通报,2007(9):331-334.[15]胡德春,李贤胜,尚健,等.不同改良剂对棕红壤酸性的改良效果[J].土壤,2006(2):206-209.[16]李九玉,赵安珍,袁金华,等.农业废弃物制备的生物质炭对红壤酸度和油菜产量的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(2):334-339.[17]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.[18]北京农业大学土壤及植物营养系.LY/T 1251-1999 森林土壤水溶性盐分分析[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.[19]林先贵.土壤微生物研究原理与方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2010.[20]BONANOMI G,de FILIPPIS F,ZOTTI M,et al.Repeated applications of organic amendments promote beneficial microbiota,improve soil fertility and increase crop yield[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2020,156:103714.[21]田小明,李俊华,危常州,等.不同生物有机肥用量对土壤活性有机质和酶活性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2012(1):26-32.[22]崔雯雯,宋全昊,高小丽,等.糜子不同种植方式对土壤酶活性及养分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(1):234-240.[23]罗俊,林兆里,李诗燕,等.不同土壤改良措施对机械压实酸化蔗地土壤理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[J].作物学报,2020,46(4):596-613.[24]刘恩科,赵秉强,李秀英,等.不同施肥制度土壤微生物量碳氮变化及细菌群落16S rDNA V3片段PCR产物的DGGE分析[J].生态学报,2007(3):1079-1085.[25]HUANG S W,JIN J Y.Status of heavy metals in agricultural soils as affected by different patterns of land use[J].Environmental Monitoring & Assessment,2008,139(1):317-327.[26]黄绍文,高伟,唐继伟,等.我国主要菜区耕层土壤盐分总量及离子组成[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(4):965-977.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-09-08