|Table of Contents|

Preliminary Study on Adaptability of E Cowpea Varieties in Bazhou

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年21
Page:
9-15
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Preliminary Study on Adaptability of E Cowpea Varieties in Bazhou
Author(s):
HUO Shunli1DONG Jie1ZHANG Bei1ZHAO Shuangyin1PAN Lei2CAI Engeli1
(1.Bayingolin Mongolia Autonomous Prefecture Institute of Agricultural Sciences,Korla,Xinjiang 841000;2.School of Life Sciences,Jianghan University/Hubei Province Engineering Research Center for Legume Plants,Wuhan,Hubei 430056)
Keywords:
cowpeaBazhou areaadaptabilitynutritional qualityyield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20215218
Abstract:
Six cowpea varieties from Jianghan University and Hubei Province Engineering Research Center for Legume Plants were used as the experimental subjects,and the local variety (‘Zhaibuwan’) was selected as the control.The agronomic traits,nutritional quality and yield were compared according to randomized block test,and the comprehensive evaluation was carried out,in order to provide reference for the introduced cowpea varieties.The results showed that vitamin C content of ‘Cowpea No.7’ (EJD-7),‘Cowpea No.14’ (EJD-14) and ‘Cowpea No.6’ (EJD-6) was significantly higher than that of CK.The crude fiber content of EJD-7,‘Cowpea No.2’ (EJD-2) and ‘Cowpea No.12’ (EJD-12) was significantly higher than CK.The crude protein content of cowpea varieties EJD-14 and EJD-7 was significantly higher than that of CK.The yield of cowpea varieties ‘Cowpea No.6’ (EJD-6),‘Jiangda Cowpea No.1’ (ZJD-1) and EJD-14 was significantly higher than that of CK.According to membership function analysis,the comprehensive performance of cowpea varieties tested from priority to poor was EJD-14,EJD-6,EJD-7,EJD-2,ZJD-1,CK,EJD-12,respectively.And the average membership function values were 0.951,0.721,0.478,0.447,0.399,0.388 and 0.277,respectively.Therefore,EJD-14 and EJD-6 had the best comprehensive performance in Bazhou area of Xinjiang,which have great potential for large-scale promotion in Bazhou area.

References:

[1]肖杰,艾星,邓稳桥,等.豇豆主要经济性状的遗传效应及相关分析[J].湖南农业大学学报,2004(2):128-130.[2]王卫平,薛智勇,朱凤香,等.豇豆对营养元素的吸收积累与分配规律研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(6):158-161.[3]唐建洲,张志元,胡丽琴,等.植物营养剂对豇豆产量、还原糖、维生素C及有机硒含量的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2014,53(1):41-42,51.[4]张瑜琨,蔺国仓,唐勇.不同豇豆品种性状比较及产量与品质的相关性分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021(3):54-61.[5]陈禅友,胡志辉,赵新春,等.中熟优质长豇豆新品种‘鄂豇豆12’[J].园艺学报,2014,41(5):1037-1038.[6]陈禅友,胡志辉,郭瑞,等.豇豆新品种‘鄂豇豆14’[J].园艺学报,2018,45(S2):2771-2772.[7]陈禅友,周余泉,赵新春,等.早熟优质长豇豆新品种‘鄂豇豆2号’[J].园艺学报,2002,29(1):88.[8]陈禅友,胡志辉,赵新春,等.长豇豆新品种‘鄂豇豆6号’[J].园艺学报,2010,37(1):157-158.[9]陈禅友,胡志辉,赵新春,等.矮生豇豆新品种鄂豇豆7号[J].长江蔬菜,2014(11):14-15.[10]王佩芝,李锡香,王述民,等.豇豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.[11]中华人民共和国农业部.饲料中粗纤维的含量测定过滤法:GB/T 6432-2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社出版,2006.[12]中国农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所[国家饲料质量监督检验中心(北京).饲料中粗蛋白的测定凯氏定氮法:GB/T 6432-2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社出版,2018.[13]张志良,瞿伟菁.植物生理学实验指导[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2003.[14]田宏,熊海谦,熊军波,等.采用主成分分析和隶属函数法综合评价14份青贮玉米品种的生产性能[J].江西农业大学学报,2015,37(2):249-259.[15]黎庭耀,李桂花,陈汉才,等.不同豇豆品种资源的营养品质分析[J].广东农业科学,2017,44(4):32-37.[16]李守强,田世龙,李海,等.主成分分析和隶属函数法综合评价15种(系)马铃薯的营养品质[J].食品工业科技,2020(6):272-276.[17]庞淑敏,方贯娜.光照强度与生长空间对蔓生长豇豆生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2016(19):39-41.[18]高怀春.辣椒果实维生素C含量变化的研究[C].泰安:山东农业大学,2004.[19]包天莉.栽培方式和土壤类型对樱桃番茄果实维生素C及相关酶活性的影响[C].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.[20]徐胜光,廖新荣,蓝佩玲,等.两种不同土壤上镁和微肥对豇豆营养品质和产量的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2005,28(2):59-63.[21]瞻园凤,党选民,戚志强,等.长豇豆种质资源主要农艺及品质性状分析[J].南方农业科学报,2015,46(11):2006-2010.[22]黎庭耀,李桂花,陈汉才,等.不同豇豆品种资源的营养品质分析[J].广东农业科学,2017,44(4):32-37.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-01-16