|Table of Contents|

Control Effect of Biocontrol Strains FC21 Against Tomato Grey Mould and Its Growth-promoting

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年12
Page:
29-33
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Control Effect of Biocontrol Strains FC21 Against Tomato Grey Mould and Its Growth-promoting
Author(s):
CHEN Xiuxiang1WANG Xuetao2MA Jinxiu2TIAN Yongqiang2LI Zhaoyu3
(1.Jiayuguan Agricultural Technology Extension Station,Jiayuguan,Gansu 735100;2.School of Biological and Pharmaceutical Engineering,Lanzhou Jiaotong University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730070;3.Research Institute,Lanzhou Jiaotong University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730070)
Keywords:
biocontrol bacteriatomato gray mouldgrowth promotioncontrol effect
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20215172
Abstract:
Taking tomato,biocontrol strains FC21 and tomato grey mould as test materials,the effects of different concentrations of fermentation broth FC21 on the germination rate of tomato seeds,the growth of tomato plants,the chlorophyll content of tomato leaves and the activities of resistance related enzymes and the control effect on grey mould of tomato were explored through pot and field experiments,in order to provide reference for the further development and utilization of FC21 against tomato gray mould.The results showed that compared with the control,the 100-fold dilution of biocontrol bacteria FC21 fermentation broth had the best promoting effect on the germination rate,bud length,root length and tomato plant,with the germination rate 93.18%,bud length 2.87 cm,root length 5.38 cm,plant height 21.32 cm and stem diameter 5.68 mm;the contents of chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll were the highest in 100-fold dilution treatment,which were 3.31 mg?g-1,1.34 mg?g-1 and 5.11 mg?g-1;the activities of SOD,POD and CAT were the highest in 10-fold dilution treatment,which were 100.11 U?g-1,128.36 U?g-1?min-1 and 13.96 U?g-1?min-1,and gradually decreased with the increase of dilution ratio.The control effect of 100 times diluted solution (1×106 cfu?mL-1) on tomato gray mould was 73.46% in pot and 72.76% in field.The biocontrol strain FC21 had good control effect and growth promotion effect on tomato gray mould.

References:

[1]毛亚辉.设施番茄灰霉病防治现状及综合防治措施[J].天津农林科技,2012(1):16-17.[2]赵统敏,高军,余文贵.棚室番茄灰霉病的发生规律与综合防治技术[J].江苏农业科学,1999(1):37-38.[3]赵杨,苗则彦,李颖,等.番茄灰霉病防治研究进展[J].中国植保导刊,2014,34(7):21-29.[4]石玉莹,宋海慧,苗爽,等.番茄灰霉病和叶霉病拮抗细菌WXCDD51的筛选鉴定及其生防促生作用[J].园艺学报,2017,44(10):1925-1936.[5]王伟,李佳,姜军坡,等.番茄灰霉病拮抗菌TB-12菌株发酵条件优化及其生防效果[J].北方园艺,2017(15):36-41.[6]赵新贝,王娟,上官妮妮,等.番茄灰霉病生防细菌TD-7的鉴定、发酵条件优化及其防治效果[J].中国生物防治学报,2021,35(2):226-239.[7]ZHANG S M,WANG Y X,MENG L Q,et al.Isolation and characterization of antifungal lipopeptides produced by endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens TF28[J].African Journal of Microbiology Research,2012,6(8):1747-1755.[8]赵新贝,上官妮妮,李月飞,等.番茄灰霉病拮抗细菌18BS-12发酵条件的优化及防治效果[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(6):116-124.[9]WANG X Y,ZHOU X N,CAI Z B,et al.A biocontrol strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa CQ-40 promote growth and control Botrytis cinerea in tomato[J].Pathogens,2021(10):2-17.[10]杨利敏,仝赞华,郭立华,等.番茄灰霉生防菌CQ的分子鉴定及其生防效果研究[J].中国生物防治学报,2015,31(6):956-960.[11]孙军德,刘灵芝,王辉,等.番茄灰霉病菌生物防治菌的筛选试验[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2005,36(5):550-553.[12]ARNON D I.Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts.Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris[J].Plant Physiology,1949,24(1):1-15.[13]蔡庆生.植物生理学实验[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2013.[14]陈捷.现代植物病理学研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005.[15]杨晓云,陈志谊,蒋盼盼,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌B1619对番茄的促生作用[J].中国生物防治学报,2016,32(3):349-356.[16]谢梓语,郭恩辉,孙宇波,等.枯草芽胞杆菌B1409对番茄和辣椒的防病促生作用[J].植物保护学报,2018,45(3):520-527.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-08-03