|Table of Contents|

Effects of Interaction of Water Retention Agent and Nitrogen,Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer on the Growth and Physiology of Perennial Ryegrass Under Drought Stress

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年12
Page:
64-71
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Interaction of Water Retention Agent and Nitrogen,Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer on the Growth and Physiology of Perennial Ryegrass Under Drought Stress
Author(s):
LIU RongLI ZhenhuaZHANG XinxinZHAO XindiLIU MintingCHAI Qi
(College of Pastoral Agricultural Science and Technology,Lanzhou University/Key Laboratory of Grassland Animal Husbandry Innovation,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Lanzhou,Gansu 730020)
Keywords:
perennial ryegrassdrought stresswater retaining agentnitrogenphosphorus and potassium fertilizer
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20215144
Abstract:
Taking the perennial ryegrass ‘Emerald’ (Lolium perenne L.) as the test material,the pot experiment was conducted,the effects of the interaction of water-retaining agent and nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on the growth physiology of perennial ryegrass under drought stress were studied,in order to provide reference for the integrated regulation of water and fertilizer on turfgrass.The results showed that when the soil moisture was sufficient,the addition of water-retaining agent and the interaction of water-retaining agent and fertilizer had little effect on perennial ryegrass;when the soil moisture content was 55% of the maximum soil water holding capacity,25 g?m-2 water retention agent treatment without fertilization and 50 g?m-2 water retention agent interaction with nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium fertilizers under fertilization could promote perennial ryegrass growth.The increase in leaf surface area,leaf length,root surface area and total root length of perennial ryegrass,increased the relative water content and chlorophyll content of perennial ryegrass leaves,and reduced the relative electrical conductivity,malondialdehyde content and proline content of leaves.

References:

[1]方印,王彦凯.中国引领全球气候变化应对的逻辑进路[J].贵州省党校学报,2019(5):123-128.[2]陈善福,舒庆尧.植物耐干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展[J].植物学通报,1999(5):555-560.[3]黄婵.植物抗旱生理基础研究进展[J].农村实用技术,2019(6):62-64.[4]魏琛琛,廖人宽,王瑜,等.保水剂与氮磷肥配施对玉米生长及养分吸收的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):236-242.[5]穆俊祥,曹兴明,刘拴成.保水剂和氮肥配施对马铃薯生长和水肥利用的影响[J].河南农业科学,2016,45(9):35-40.[6]朱元浩,杨培岭,杜鑫,等.利用氢氧稳定同位素探究保水剂对玉米根系作用机理[J].灌溉排水学报,2016,35(10):42-46.[7]赖小连,颜玉娟,颜立红,等.干旱胁迫对黄檀幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2020,48(7):1-6.[8]高晓宁,梁雯,赵冰.外源水杨酸对2个杜鹃花品种抗旱性的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(3):131-136,177.[9]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.[10]陈爱葵,韩瑞宏,李东洋,等.植物叶片相对电导率测定方法比较研究[J].广东第二师范学院学报,2010,30(5):88-91.[11]张宪政.植物叶绿素含量测定:丙酮乙醇混合液法[J].辽宁农业科学,1986(3):28-30.[12]杨虎臣.干旱胁迫对幼苗期甜菜脯氨酸(Pro)代谢通路的影响[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2016.[13]蒲光兰,周兰英,胡学华,等.干旱胁迫对金太阳杏叶绿素荧光动力学参数的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005(3):44-48.[14]路贵和,安海润.作物抗旱性鉴定方法与指标研究进展[J].山西农业科学,1999(4):39-43.[15]自海云,李琬婷,程小毛,等.镉胁迫对洋常春藤叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(5):7-12.[16]韦兰英,袁维圆,焦继飞,等.紫花苜蓿和菊苣比叶面积和光合特性对不同用量保水剂的响应[J].生态学报,2009,29(12):6772-6778.[17]王子凤.鸢尾属6种植物对干旱胁迫的响水分应[D].南京:南京林业大学,2009.[18]王文佳.大豆花期干旱胁迫下生理与光合响应规律研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2020.[19]陈杨,王磊,白由路,等.有效积温与不同氮磷钾处理夏玉米株高和叶面积指数定量化关系[J].中国农业科学,2021,54(22):4761-4777.[20]提莎木.影响交播多年生黑麦草和狗牙根综合表现的N、P、K施肥优化研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2018.[21]杜玉赫,吴金山,赵庆杰.氮磷钾肥配施对海滨雀稗草坪质量及其生理代谢的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2018,46(4):14-17.[22]白小明,相斐,鲁存海,等.氮磷钾肥对高羊茅扩展性和根系特性的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(5):600-606.[23]朱力,王华磊,赵致,等.不同配比氮磷钾硼肥对万寿竹种子发芽的影响[J].山地农业生物学报,2016,35(2):58-61.[24]丁奋谦,高永,党晓宏,等.NaCl胁迫下氮磷钾元素浸种对梭梭种子萌发影响研究[J].绿色科技,2020(9):8-11,24.[25]CHAKHCHAR A,CHAGUER N,FERRADOUS A,et al.Root system response in Argania spinosa plants under drought stress and recovery[J].Plant Signal Behav,2018(13):e1489669.[26]ZHOU G Y,ZHOU X H,NIE Y Y,et al.Droughtinduced changes in root biomass largely result from altered root morphologic al traits:Evidence from a synthesis of global field trials[J].Plant Cell Environ,2018,41:2589-2599.[27]BASHIR W,ANWAR S,ZHAO Q,et al.Interactive effect of drought and cadmium stress on soybean root morphology and gene expression[J].Ecotoxic ol Environ Saf,2019,175:90-101.[28]李琬.干旱对大豆根系生育的影响及灌溉缓解效应研究进展[J].草业学报,2019,28(4):192-202.[29]梁栋.IAA和BR参与干旱胁迫影响烟草侧根发育的研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2021.[30]赵广兴,徐天渊,李王成,等.白茎盐生草幼苗对干旱胁迫的响应研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(4):195-202.[31]罗彩云,杨莹.不同浓度保水剂对早熟禾生长过程中节水效果的影响[J].陕西农业科学,2021,67(2):41-47.[32]刘刊.保水剂对草坪草抗性的影响[D].苏州:苏州大学,2013.[33]蔺豆豆,赵桂琴,琚泽亮,等.15份燕麦材料苗期抗旱性综合评价[J].草业学报,2021,30(11):108-121.[34]马力,周青平,颜红波,等.氮肥与保水剂配施对青燕1号燕麦产量的影响[J].草业科学,2014,31(10):1929-1934.[35]杨国伟,张秀清,苏东海,等.水分胁迫下几种冷季型草坪草抗旱性研究[J].河南农业科学,2004(2):38-42.[36]夏汉平,敖惠修,刘世忠.南方草坪冬季枯黄原因及改进对策:以广州市草坪为例[J].中国草地,2000(5):65-68.[37]刘迪.保水剂对草地早熟禾生长及抗旱性的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.[38]廖人宽,杨培岭,任树梅.高吸水树脂保水剂提高肥效及减少农业面源污染[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(17):1-10.[39]王瑾,刘桂茹,杨学举.PEG胁迫下不同抗旱小麦品种幼苗形态及主要理化特性的比较[J].河北农业大学学报,2005,28(5):6-10.[40]刘玲玲.不同保水剂和覆盖措施对毕节烟区烤烟抗旱效果的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2015.[41]ASGHAR A,SAMAD Y A,HASHAIKEH R.Cellulose/PEO blends with enhanced water absorption and retention functionality[J].Journal of Applied Polymer Science,2012,125(3):2121-2127.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-08-26