|Table of Contents|

Analysis of Leaf Ecological Function of Main Garden Greening Tree Species in Hohhot,Inner Mongolia

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年11
Page:
51-58
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Analysis of Leaf Ecological Function of Main Garden Greening Tree Species in Hohhot,Inner Mongolia
Author(s):
ZHAO Jing1; ZHANG Wenying2; YAN Wenhui3; GAO Runhong1; ZHANG Hongling1; YANG Yongzhi1
(1.College of Forestry,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010019;2.Baotou Forestry and Grassland Workstation,Baotou,Inner Mongolia 014030;3.Hohhot Ecological Environment Science and Technology Extension Center,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010011)
Keywords:
Hohhot; landscaping tree species; blade; ecological function
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20215133
Abstract:
Taking 33 landscaping tree species in Hohhot as test materials,the leaf water capacity,leaf dust retention,leaf carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus content were measured,the relevant eco-environmental functions of the leaves of main landscaping tree species in Hohhot were studied,in order to provide reference for the selection of landscaping tree species in arid and semi-arid cities.The results showed that,1) there were significant differences in various ecological functions of leaves of different tree species.The range of leaf water holding capacity was 0.06-1.42 g?g-1,the lowest was Robinia pseudoacacia cv.idaho and the highest was Cotoneaster acutifolius;the range of dust retention capacity of leaves was 1.54-29.70 g?kg-1 the lowest was Larix gmelinii and the highest was Pinus tabuliformis;the nitrogen content in leaves ranged from 6.68 g?kg-1 to 34.40 g?kg-1,the lowest was Betula platyphylla Suk and the highest was Robinia pseudoacacia;the phosphorus content in leaves ranged from 0.03 g?kg-1 to 0.36 g?kg-1,the lowest was Acer L.and the highest was Sabina vulgaris;the organic carbon content of leaves ranged from 358.11 g?kg-1to 645.42 g?kg-1,the lowest was Tamarix ramosissima,and the highest was Quercus wutaishansea.2) Generally,the water holding capacity of broad-leaved trees was stronger,while the dust holding capacity of coniferous trees was stronger than that of broad-leaved trees.The nitrogen content of Leguminous trees was the highest,the phosphorus content of Sabina vulgaris,Swida alba and Salix babylonica was the highest,the organic carbon content of Quercus wutaishansea and Sabina vulgaris was the strongest,and the comprehensive functions of Sabina vulgaris,Quercus wutaishansea,Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge,Pinus tabulaeformis and Pinus sylvestris were the most prominent.3) The water holding capacity was negatively correlated with other functions,but the dust holding capacity was positively correlated with other functions,the contents of nitrogen and phosphorus were positively correlated,and negatively correlated with the content of organic carbon.

References:

[1]李永梅,李煜.城市园林绿化对大气污染防治功能的探讨[J].农业与技术,2018,38(20):216.[2]鲁敏,李英杰.城市生态绿地系统建设：植物种选择与绿化工程构建[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2005．[3]宋艳华.城市园林绿化建设中存在的问题及其解决措施[J].南方农业,2018,12(12):67-69.[4]郭华慧,张芸香,郭晋平,等.基于树种多角度类型的太原市园林绿化树种应用现状与问题诊断[J].山西农业科学,2017,45(6):987-992.[5]杨华.浅析城市园林绿化中的树种搭配[J].中国农业信息,2017(12):39.[6]赵妍,唐晓杰,裴伶俐.城市园林绿化树种叶片滞尘与SO2吸收能力分析：以长春市为例[J].北华大学学报,2017,18(3):315-320.[7]赵金蒙,徐长贵,陈宏伟.以乡土植物为主的城市园林绿化发展趋势分析[J].南方农机,2019(8):237.[8]党晓宏,高永,高荣丽,等.内蒙古鄂尔多斯地区城市园林绿化树种优选研究[J].北方园艺,2017(7):86-91.[9]王天喜,刁启瑞.乌海市园林绿化树种资源分析[J].内蒙古林业科技,2017,43(3):29-31.[10]李旭平.包头市城市园林绿化存在问题及建议[J].现代园艺,2016(3):165.[11]王希彦.我国北方城市园林绿化树种的选择[J].新农业,2016(13):37-38.[12]康忠武,杨建华,刘柿良,等.中国现代城市绿地树种规划研究进展[J].四川林业科技,2016,37(4):110-112.[13]邓成,张守攻,陆元昌.森林改善空气环境质量功能监测与评价研究[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(1):84-89.[14]张桐,洪秀玲,刘玉军.城市居住小区常见树种的滞留颗粒物能力及绿地生态服务能力优化[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2017,48(3):296-303.[15]叶志忠,黄靖.浅谈城市绿化系统的建设与发展[J].城市建设理论研究,2013(4):62.[16]谭一心.城市园林植物生态功能优化策略探讨[J].决策与信息(下旬刊),2013(8):150.[17]杨秀艳,张建国,胡俊达,等.廊坊市城市绿化树种现状及分析[J].河北林业科技,2003,10(5):28-29．[18]罗倬.浅谈植物在园林景观中的作用[J].北京农业,2011(33):1558.[19]牛宏,曹兵,刘婧,等.银川市城市园林绿化树种调查与现状分析[J].园艺学报,2014,41(5):2770.[20]潘文,张卫强,张方秋,等.广州市园林绿化植物苗木对二氧化硫和二氧化氮吸收能力分析[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(4):606-612．[21]贺勇,李磊,李俊毅,等.北方30种景观树种净化空气效益分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(5):37-39．[22]于宁,李海梅.青岛市城阳居住区主要灌木树种滞尘效益评价[J].福建林业科技,2011,38(2):68-72．[23]于志会,赵红艳,杨波.吉林市常见园林植物滞尘能力研究[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(6):173-175．

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-07-19