|Table of Contents|

Numerical Classification of Actinidia arguta Planch Germplasm Resources According Phenotypic Characters

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年10
Page:
33-40
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Numerical Classification of Actinidia arguta Planch Germplasm Resources According Phenotypic Characters
Author(s):
WANG Donglai; ZHOU Wenjie; YAO Ping; ZHAO Fengjun; HUANG Guohui
(Institute of Advanced Characteristic Agriculture Studies,Liaodong University/Key Laboratory of Blueberry Breeding and Postharvest Handling,Liaoning Province/Innovation Cooperation Center of Blueberry Industry of Liaodong,Dandong,Liaoning 118003)
Keywords:
Actinidia arguta Planch; phenotypic characters; numerical classification
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20214847
Abstract:
Twenty-four germplasm of Actinidia arguta Planch collected from Northeast China were used as materials.Q type cluster,R type cluster and principal component analysis were performed.The leaf characters,buds and shoots characters,flower and fruit characters were investigated.Among the 31 phenotypic traits,there were 1 qualitative binary character,10 multivariate quality characters and 20 qualitative polymorphic characters.The further relationship between Actinidia arguta Planch germplasm resources and phenotypic characters were explored,in order to provide reference for the development and utilization of Actinidia arguta Planch germplasm resources.The results showed that among 20 numerical characters,the single fruit weight was the largest and the coefficient of variation was 44.22%,and the smallest coefficient of variation of the flower diameter was 7.38%.The result of R cluster analysis showed that 31 phenotypic characters were divided into four groups at the squared euclidean distance of 17.21,of which the shape of the calyx shape was far away from other characters.The result of Q cluster analysis showed that 24 Actinidia arguta Planch germplasm resources were divided into four groups at the square euclidean distance of 20.08.Phenotypic characters such as leaf length,leaf width,leaf thick and petiole length could be used as important indexes to distinguish different types of Actinidia arguta Planch.Classification results of 24 Actinidia arguta Planch germplasm resources by principal component analysis was similar to the results of Q cluster analysis.Phenotypic characters such as leaf length,the traits of fruit,leaf thick and internode length could be used as important indexes to distinguish different types of Actinidia arguta Planch.In summary,there were abundant phenotypic characters in Actinidia arguta Planch.14 phenotypic characters such as fruit longitudinal diameter played an important role in the numerical classification.

References:

[1]刘延吉,朱雪媞,田晓艳.辽宁地区软枣猕猴桃果实性状次生物质鉴定及营养分析[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2010,41(2):228-230.[2]HALE I L,CONNOLLY B A.Actinidia arguta (Actinidiaceae):A new record of a naturalized introduction in Connecticut[J].Rhodora,2014,116:352-355.[3]LATOCHA P.The nutritional and health benefits of kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta):A review[J].Plant Foods for Human Nutrition,2017,72(4):325-334.[4]王拥军.大果型软枣猕猴桃嫩枝嫁接及硬枝扦插繁育[J].中国林副特产,2016(4):62-63.[5]李志军,刘国成.软枣猕猴桃大小孢子发育过程的细胞形态学观察[J].林业科学,2016,52(7):158-164.[6]姜爱丽,白雪,杨柳,等.软枣猕猴桃加工与保鲜研究进展[J].食品工业科技,2016(14):82.[7]齐秀娟,韩礼星,李明,等.全红型猕猴桃新品种‘红宝石星’[J].园艺学报,2011,38(3):601-602.[8]谢玥,王丽华,董官勇,等.软枣猕猴桃新品种‘宝贝星’[J].园艺学报,2014,41(1):189-190.[9]秦红艳,范书田,艾军,等.软枣猕猴桃新品种‘馨绿’[J].园艺学报,2017,44(10):2029-2030.[10]张敏,王贺新,娄鑫,等.世界软枣猕猴桃品种资源特点及育种趋势[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(11):3289-3297.[11]朴一龙,赵兰花.软枣猕猴桃研究进展[J].北方园艺,2008(3):76-78.[12]KATAOKA I,MIZUGAMI T,KIM J G,et al.Ploidy variation of hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta) resources and geographic distribution in Japan[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2010,124(3):409-414.[13]LATOCHA P.The comparison of some biological features of Actinidia arguta cultivars fruit[J].Ann Warsaw Univ Life Sci SGGW,Hortic Landscape Archit,2007(28):105-109.[14]楚爱香,杨英军,汤庚国,等.河南垂丝海棠品种数量分类研究[J].园艺学报,2009,36(3):377-384.[15]沈玉英,丁夏君,高志红,等.基于表型性状数量分类的梅品种遗传多样性分析[J].果树学报,2011,28(5):802-807.[16]张毓,王苗苗,张雪,等.中国华北和东北地区杓兰属植物的数量分类研究[J].园艺学报,2013,40(5):933-942.[17]贾东海,王秀珍,侯献飞,等.32份油药兼用红花种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J].新疆农业科学,2020,57(10):1775-1784.[18]李斌,顾万春,卢宝明.白皮松天然群体种实性状表型多样性研究[J].生物多样性,2002,10(2):181-188.[19]王江民,陈素梅,滕年军,等.基于形态性状的菊属与亚菊属植物亲缘关系的研究[J].植物遗传资源学报,2013,14(6):1031-1037.[20]黄宏文.猕猴桃研究进展[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.[21]姜正旺,王圣梅,张忠慧,等.猕猴桃属花粉形态及其系统学意义[J].植物分类学报,2004,42(3):245-260.[22]秦红艳,许培磊,艾军,等.软枣猕猴桃种质资源果实品质、表型性状多样性及主成分分析[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(1):160-165.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-07-04