|Table of Contents|

Ecological Benefits of Tree Species in Park Green Space Based on GGE Biplot Analysis

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年13
Page:
86-95
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Ecological Benefits of Tree Species in Park Green Space Based on GGE Biplot Analysis
Author(s):
GUO Yang1; 2; LIU Yang3; YANG Weiju4
(1.Art and Design College，Harbin University，Harbin，Heilongjiang 150086；2.Postdoctoral Research Station,Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Postdoctoral Programme，Harbin，Heilongjiang 150086;3.Heilongjiang Rural Economic Service and Development Research Center，Harbin，Heilongjiang 150001;4.Architectural Engineering Institute,Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology,Harbin，Heilongjiang 150022)
Keywords:
park green space; landscape species; carbon sequestration and oxygen release; cooling and humidifying; GGE-biplot
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20214788
Abstract:
Twenty-three species of common garden plants were selected as experimental materials to measure instantaneous net photosynthetic rate and instantaneous transpiration rate of leaves in urban park green space with regional cultural characteristics in Harbin.The carbon sequestration，oxygen release and cooling and humidification of twenty-three common garden plants were studied and evaluated by GGE biplot,in order to provide reference for the selection of plants in urban parks with regional cultural characteristics.The results showed that the capacity of carbon sequestration，oxygen release，cooling and humidification per unit land area was greater for tree than shrub，and broadleaf than conifer.GGE biplot analysis showed that Harbin Music Park was the best sample plot to identify the ecological benefits of tree species.Betula platyphylla,Populus alba ‘Berolinensis’，Prunus cerasifera Ehrhar.‘Pissardii’ were the most adaptable tree species，which were sensitive to environmental changes in park green space.Thirteen species with the best ecological stability were selected，which were Populus alba ‘Berolinensis’，Betula platyphylla，Forsythia mandshurica，Prunus cerasifera Ehrhar.‘Pissardii’，Ulmus pumila，Quercus mongolica，Ulmus pumila ‘Jinye’, Acer ginnala，Juglans mandshurica，Salix matsudana，Sabina chinensis ‘Dandong’，Prunus armeniaca，Pruns salicina.

References:

[1]北京北林地景园林规划设计院有限责任公司.城市绿地分类:CJJ/T85-2017[S].北京:中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部，2018.[2]冀媛媛,(意)罗杰威.建立城市绿地植物固碳量计算系统对于营造低碳景观的意义[J].中国园林,2016（10）:31-35.[3]郭杨.哈尔滨居住小区绿地植物生态效益及优化配置研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2015.[4]徐亚如,戴菲,殷利华.武汉园博园碳汇效能综合研究[J].中国城市林业,2019(1):30-35.[5]陈自新,苏雪痕,刘少宗,等.北京城市园林绿化生态效益的研究(2)[J].中国园林,1998,14(56):51-52.[6]刘新鹏,薄一览,闫晓云.呼和浩特市居住区树种选择调查与研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,31(1):107-113.[7]王竞红.园林植物景观评价体系的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.[8]薛海丽,唐海萍,李延明,等.北京常见绿化植物生态调节服务研究[J].北京师范的大学学报(自然科学版),2018(5):35-40.[9]张艳丽,费世民,李智勇,等.成都市沙河主要绿化树种固碳释氧和降温增湿效益[J].生态学报,2013,33(12):3878-3887．[10]杨富森.楼盘展示区体验式景观设计研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2015.[11]宋卓琴,康红梅,牛艳,等.太原市主要园林植物春季固碳释氧和降温增湿效应[J].山西农业科学,2018,46(10):1685-1690,1729.[12]熊向艳,韩永伟,高馨婷,等.北京市城乡结合部17种常用绿化植物固碳释氧功能研究[J].环境工程技术学报,2014,4(3):248-255.[13]郭晖.河南省郑州市公园绿地常见植物固碳释氧能力分析[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(15):103-106.[14]郝鑫杰,李素英,王继伟,等.呼和浩特市13种绿化植物固碳释氧效率的比较研究[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(6):1196-1204.[15]赵艳玲,阚丽艳,车生泉.上海社区常见园林植物固碳释氧效应及优化配置对策[J].上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2014,32(4):45-53.[16]陈少鹏,庄倩倩,郭太君.长春市园林树木固碳释氧与增湿降温效应研究[J].湖北农业科学,2012,51(4):750-756.[17]陈月华,廖建华,覃事妮.长沙地区19种园林植物光合特性及固碳释氧测定[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(10):116-120.[18]GABRIEL K R.The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis[J].Biometrika，1971,58:453-467.[19]孟令聪,路明,王敏.GGE双标图模型在玉米新品种测试中的应用[J].玉米科学,2019,27(3):30-34.[20]柴继宽,慕平,赵桂琴.8个燕麦品种在甘肃的产量稳定性及试点代表性研究[J].草地学报,2016,24(5):1100-1107.[21]方立魁.基于GGE双标图分析筛选生态适应性好的优质稻品种[J].贵州农业科学,2017,45(6):5-8.[22]林元震.林木基因型与环境互作的研究方法及其应用[J].林业科学,2019,55(5)：142-151．[23]程玲,张心菲,张鑫鑫.基于BLUP和GGE双标图的林木多地点试验分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(3):87-93.[24]〖JP2〗郑聪慧,张鸿景,王玉忠,等.基于BLUP和GGE双标图的华北落叶松家系区域试验分析[J].林业科学,2019,55(8):73-83.[25]李金花.基于BLUP和GGE双标图的黑杨派无性系生长性状基因型与环境互作效应[J].林业科学,2021,57(6):64-73.[26]ESOBEDOA J F,NOWAK D.Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2009,90(3):102-110. [27]MCPHERSON E G,NOWAK D.Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: The Chicago urban forest climate project[J].Urban Ecosystem,1997(1):49-61.[28]杨士弘.城市绿化树木的降温增湿效应研究[J].地理研究，1994,13(4):74-79.[29]YAN W K,KANG M S.GGE biplot analysis:A graphical tool for breeders,geneticists,and agronomists[M].Florida:CRC Press,2003.[30]严威凯,盛庆来,胡跃高.GGE叠图法:分析品种×环境互作模式的理想方法[J].作物学报,2001,27(1):21-28.[31]MIHALAKAKOU G，SANTANMOURIS M，PAPANIKOLAOU N，et al.Simulation of the urban heat island phenomen in Mediterranean climates[J].Pure and Applied Geophysics,2004,161(2):429-451.[32]STREUTKER D R.A remote sensing study of the urban heat island of Houston，Texas[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing，2002,23(13):2595-2608.[33]薛雪,张金池,孙永涛,等.上海常绿树种固碳释氧和降温增湿效益研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(3):81-86.[34]韩焕金.城市绿化植物的固碳释氧效应[J].东北林业大学学报，2005(5):68-70.[35]李想,李海梅,马颖,等.居住绿化树种固碳释氧和降温增湿效应研究[J].北方园艺,2008(8):99-102.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-08-31