|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Dewaxing Methods on Drying Effect and Dry Fruit Quality of Wolfberry

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年02
Page:
87-93
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Dewaxing Methods on Drying Effect and Dry Fruit Quality of Wolfberry
Author(s):
SHANG Weijun1; ZHANG Xu1; LI Xiaohong1; LIU Yarong1; LI Jie2; 3; WANG Youke2; 3
(1.Yumen Forestry Management Station,Jiuquan,Gansu 735200;2.College of Forestry,Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730070;3.Wolfberry Harmless Cultivation Engineering Research Center of Gansu Province,Lanzhou,Gansu 730070)
Keywords:
wolfberry; dewaxing of fresh fruit; dehydration rate; fruit quality
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20213329
Abstract:
Ｔhe fresh fruit of ‘Ningqi Ⅶ’ wolfberry was used as test material,and dewaxed with different pH micro electric water,different concentrations of edible lye and different soaking time.The effects of different treatments on the dehydration rate of fresh wolfberry fruit,total sugar content,polysaccharide content,betaine content,commodity rate,color,phase and drying cost were studied,in order to obtain more efficient,environmentally friendly medlar dry dewaxing agent and its application method.The results showed that micro electric water and edible lye dewaxing agents and their treatment levels had significant effects on the dehydration rate,commodity rate,appearance phase and drying cost of ‘Ningqi Ⅶ’ fresh fruit,but had no significant effect on the contents of total sugar,polysaccharide and betaine.Among them,the micro electric water treatment had no alkali powder residue on the fruit surface,reduce drying cost by 29.11%,but the commodity rate was 10.55%,and the dehydration rate was slow.The residue of alkali powder on the fruit surface treated with edible lye was obvious,the cost was high,the appearance and taste were poor,but the commodity rate was high and the dehydration speed was fast.In production,the pH of micro electric water 10.5 and the soaking time 2 minutes were better.

References:

[1]孙文丽,MOHAMAD H S,程奇.枸杞化学成分及药用价值国外研究现状[J].中医药信息,2020,37(3):116-120.[2]冉国伟,张慧媛,刘瑜,等.智能多段式变温变湿太阳能枸杞烘干设备的设计与试验[J].包装与食品机械,2015,33(6):34-38.[3]李朋亮,廖若宇,王旭,等.不同干燥方式和除蜡剂对枸杞总黄酮的影响[J].食品科技,2014,39(5):79-83.[4]牛建强.枸杞的采收、制干、包装、存储[J].农村经济与科技,2017,28(4):291,306.[5]毛金梅.枸杞鲜果采收及制干技术[J].现代农业科技,2013,4(15):299-300.[6]肖伟,张彩君.微电水浸泡处理除农残特性研究[J].长江蔬菜,2020(8):27-29.[7]苟春林,张艳.枸杞质量安全现状分析[J].宁夏农林科技,2019,60(9):46-48.[8]韩江学.一种用微电水除去枸杞鲜果果蜡的方法[P].中国：201811438556.3,2019-04-09.[9]李志豪,周彬,王萍,等.碱性电解水对籽瓜种仁蛋白质提取效果的影响[J].食品科学,2019,40(7):103-108.[10]谭晓妍,孙君社,宁慧娟,等.碱性电解水耦合酶提取茶渣蛋白工艺优化[J].食品工业科技,2018,39(15):219-224,233.[11]李玉锋,王敬敬,彭知云,等.超声辅助碱性电解水提取南极磷虾蛋白质及结构和功能特性分析[C].西安:中国食品科学技术学会第十七届年会,2020.[12]周冬仁,徐磊,潘国栋.碱性电解水对大米样品中黄曲霉毒素B1的去除作用[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2019,10(20):6957-6962.[13]刘海杰,李润泽,苏东海,等.碱性电解水降解苹果表面的高效氯氟氰菊酯农药[J].食品科技,2015,40(2):123-127.[14]杜明润,肖伟,李传福,等.强酸、强碱性电解水的灭菌效果比较研究[J].中国农学通报,2019,35(17):98-101.[15]魏肖鹏,董宇,栾广忠,等.电解水对黄瓜白粉病的防效以及对黄瓜生长和品质的影响[J].中国植保导刊,2015,35(2):8-12,85.[16]杨世武,胡宇舟,杨普云,等.一种利用酸性氧化电解水防治草莓灰霉病的方法[P].中国：201810294346.5,2018-08-28.[17]杜静,黄朝炎,石磊,等.一种利用电解水防治小麦条锈病的方法[P].中国：201810120759.1,2019-08-23.[18]GB/T 18672-2014,枸杞[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.[19]NY/T 2947-2016,枸杞中甜菜碱含量的测定高效液相色谱法[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2016.[20]宋慧慧,陈芹芹,毕金峰,等.干燥方式及碱液处理对鲜枸杞干燥特性和品质的影响[J].食品科学,2018,39(15):197-206.[21]李生晏,蔡志清,曹雪源,等.枸杞果实的采收制干与贮藏[J].石河子科技,1994(3):37-38.[22]杜静.枸杞表皮蜡质及制干技术研究[D].兰州:兰州理工大学,2010.[23]杨云峰,王光明,侯祥英,等.我国枸杞育种与栽培研究进展[J].农业科技通讯,2019,572(8):74-76.[24]李文丽.枸杞脱蜡剂及促干机理研究[D].天津:天津科技大学,2016.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-04-08