|Table of Contents|

Effects of ABA on Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of Tomato Under Waterlogging Stress

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年24
Page:
1-7
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of ABA on Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of Tomato Under Waterlogging Stress
Author(s):
YIN Dongmei1QI Shuai1ZHANG Dongju2GAO Wei1YANG Zaiqiang3
(1.The Ecological Technique and Engineering College,Shanghai Institute of Technology,Shanghai 201418;2.Shanghai Huawei Water Saving Irrigation Co.Ltd.,Shanghai 201505;3.Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters,Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210044)
Keywords:
waterlogging stressphotosynthesistomatoABA
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20211204
Abstract:
Taking five tomato lines as test materials,including ABA deficient mutant (LA0673) and its wild type (LA0535),NCED overexpressing transgenic strain RD29A:NCED1 (#2,#7) and its wild type plant Mill.L.cv.New Yorker (WT).Changes of tomato external morphology and related physiological indexes were studied by simulating waterlogging stress artificially,in order to understand the effect of ABA on photosynthetic physiology of tomato.The results showed that the leaves of LA0673 were wilting and showed a gray-green color,and there was no aerial roots in LA0673 under waterlogging stress,but there were a lot of aerial roots in the other 4 tomato lines;the root activity of five lines significantly decreased and LA0673 was dead at 7 days of waterlogging treatment,The root activity of LA0535 decreased to 634% of 0 day,962% of #7,314% of WT and 643% of #2;LA0673 showed a significant increase in chlorophyll content due to wilting on the 7 days of flooding treatment,and the other 4 lines showed a downward trend,the chlorophyll content of LA0535 was 5713% of 0 day,6098% of #7,6067% of WT and 8030% of #2;the net photosynthetic rate (Pn),stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rates (Tr) of five lines showed a downward trend;the Gs of LA0535,WT,#2 and #7 decreased immediately in the early waterlogging treatment,they were earlier than LA0673;the intracellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci) of five lines increased significantly or stabilized at a high level.Combined with the observation of external morphological changes under waterlogging stress,it was suggested that ABA was closely involved in plant photosynthesis by regulating stomatal size;ABA improved waterlogging tolerance by promoting the aerial root or adventitious root formation of tomato.

References:

[1]王峰,杜太生,邱让建,等.亏缺灌溉对温室番茄产量与水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(9):46-52.[2]周艳,刘慧英,邓嘉欣,等.GSH/GS对盐胁迫下番茄幼苗谷胱甘肽化修饰和抗氧化系统的影响[J].分子植物育种,2020(6):1-16.[3]CHEN L,WANG W Q,PENG L.Photosynthetic and physiological responses of Kandelia candel L.Druce seedlings to duration of tidal immersion in artificial seawater[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2005,54(3):256-266.[4]CHAVES M M,OLIVEIRA M M.Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits:Prospects for watersaving agriculture[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2004,55(407):2365-2384.[5]何小三,徐林初,龚春,等.干旱胁迫对‘赣无12’苗期光合特性的影响[J].中南林业科技大学报,2018,38(12):52-61.[6]邓辉茗,龙聪颖,蔡仕珍,等.不同水分胁迫对绵毛水苏幼苗形态和生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2018,38(6):1099-1108.[7]PHUKAN U J,MISHRA S,SHUKLA R K.Waterlogging and submergence stress:Affects and acclimation[J].Critical Reviews in Biotechnology,2016,36(5):956-966.[8]RAGHAVENDRA A S,GONUGUNTA V K,CHRISTMANN A,et al.ABA perception and signalling[J].Trends in Plant Science,2010,15(7):395-401.[9]YU M,ZHOU Z,DENG X,et al.Physiological mechanism of programmed cell death aggravation and acceleration in wheat endosperm cells caused by waterlogging[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2017,39(1):23.[10]YAMAUCHI T,SHIMAMURA S,NAKAZONO M,et al.Aerenchyma formation in crop species:A review[J].Field Crops Research,2013,152(10):8-16.[11]DOUPIS G,KAVROULAKIS N,PSARRAS G,et al.Growth,photosynthetic performance and antioxidative response of ‘Hass’ and ‘Fuerte’ avocado (Persea americana Mill.) plants grown under high soil moisture[J].Photosynthetica,2016(8):1-9.[12]REN B,ZHANG J,DONG S,et al.Regulations of 6-Benzyladenine (6-BA) on leaf ultrastructure and photosynthetic characteristics of waterlogged summer maize[J].Journal of Plant Growth Regulation,2017,36(1-2):1-12.[13]CHENG X X,YU M,ZHANG N,et al.Reactive oxygen species regulate programmed cell death progress of endosperm in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under waterlogging[J].Protoplasma,2016,253(2):1-17.[14]XU X,WANG H,QI X,et al.Waterlogging-induced increase in fermentation and related gene expression in the root of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2014,179:388-395.[15]SAUTER M.Root responses to flooding[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2013,16(3):282-286.[16]HU Z,QI X,ZHANG M,et al.Roles of phytohormones in morphological and anatomical responses of plants to flooding Stress[J].Springer Netherlands,2016(5):117-132.[17]STEFFENS B,SAUTER M.Role of ethylene and other plant hormones in orchestrating the responses to low oxygen conditions[J].Plant Cell Monographs,2014,21(30):117-132.[18]高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.[19]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.[20]高兰阳,李洪泉,陈涛,等.植物对涝渍响应的研究进展[J].草业与畜牧,2010(2):1-5.[21]卓仁英,陈益泰.木本植物抗涝性研究进展[J].林业科学研究,2001(2):215-222.[22]江敏,刘才,宁慧宇,等.脱落酸对涝渍条件下棉花幼苗生长及相关生理指标的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2017(7):73-75.[23]蔡金峰,曹福亮,张往祥.淹水胁迫对乌桕幼苗生长及根系无氧呼吸酶活性的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(9):5-10.[24]CHEN X,YAO Q,GAO X,et al.Shoot-to-root mobile transcription factor HY5 coordinates plant carbon and nitrogen acquisition[J].Curr Biol,2016,26(5):640-646.[25]刘祖祺,张石城.植物抗性生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994.[26]SCHMULL M,THOMAS F M.Morphological and physiological reactions of young deciduous trees (Quercus robur L.,Q.petraea [Matt.] Liebl.,Fagus sylvatica L.) to waterlogging[J].Plant & Soil,2000,225(1-2):227-242.[27]尹冬梅,陈发棣,陈素梅.涝渍胁迫下5种菊花近缘种属植物生理特性[J].生态学报,2009,29(4):2143-2148.[28]孙侨南.干旱胁迫对黄瓜幼苗光合特性及活性氧代谢的影响[D].天津:天津大学,2008.[29]刘全勇,卢锟,李泽,等.水分胁迫对刨花润楠幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J].中南林业科技大学报,2016,36(9):29-35,43.[30]刘美君,隋晓青,安沙舟.干旱脱水对狗牙根叶片光合机构的影响[J].草地学报,2018,26(2):441-446.[31]AHMED S,NAWATA E,SAKURATANI T.Changes of endogenous ABA and ACC,and their correlations to photosynthesis and water relations in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczak cv.KPS1) during waterlogging[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2006,57(3):278-284.[32]刘臣琼,王小德,张娟,等.涝渍胁迫下厚皮香幼苗光响应特征[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(4):48-52.[33]关义新,戴俊英,林艳.水分胁迫下植物叶片光合的气孔和非气孔限制[J].植物生理学通讯,1995,31(4):293-297.[34]刘聪聪.淹水胁迫对樱桃番茄苗期的影响及其缓解途径研究[D].海口:海南大学,2020.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-03-16