|Table of Contents|

Analysis on Farmers′ Willingness and Behavior Differences in Fertilizer Reduction Substitution

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年19
Page:
151-158
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Analysis on Farmers′ Willingness and Behavior Differences in Fertilizer Reduction Substitution
Author(s):
LI Jieyan1; ZHANG Hongli1; 2
(1.School of Economics and Management,Shihezi University,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832000;2.Center for Agricultural Modernization Research,Shihezi University,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832000)
Keywords:
fertilizer reduction substitution; willingness to adopt; behavior of adoption; risk prediction; difference
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20211039
Abstract:
Based on the social cognition theory and farmer behavior theory，an analytical framework was constructed by combining with the survey data of farmers in Huaxian county，Henan Province，and the Logistic model was used to analyze farmers′ willingness and behavior differences in fertilizer reduction substitution and their reasons.The results showed that the effect of farmers′ endowment，farmers′ cognition and external environment on farmers′ willingness and behavior to adopt fertilizer reduction substitution showed the characteristics of ‘general consistency，partial differences’.The risk prediction characteristics of fertilizer quality and yield were not guaranteed，which seriously hinder the transformation of farmers′ willingness to adopt chemical fertilizer reduction instead of adopting to behavior，which was the key factor that causes their willingness to adopt and behavior to deviate.Based on this，strengthen the publicity and training of the agricultural technology department，guide farmers to deeply understand the importance of the coordinated development of ecological benefits，economic benefits and social benefits，and correctly understand the substitution value of fertilizer reduction；carefully evaluate the risks of adopting fertilizer reduction behaviors,to prevent problems such as uneven fertilizer quality and long effective period.

References:

[1]谢贤鑫,陈美球,李志朋,等.农户生计分化与化肥施用行为:基于江西省1 421户农户的调研[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018(10):155-163.[2]杨钰蓉,罗小锋.减量替代政策对农户有机肥替代技术模式采纳的影响:基于湖北省茶叶种植户调查数据的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2018(10):77-85.[3]郑微微，徐雪高.江苏省化肥施用强度变化驱动因子分解及其影响因素分析[J].华中农业大学学报 (社会科学版),2017(4)：55-62.[4]毕茜，陈赞迪，彭珏.农户亲环境农业技术选择行为的影响因素分析:基于重庆336户农户的统计分析[J].西南大学学报 (社会科学版)，2014(6):44-49.[5]HE K,ZHANG J B,ZENG Y M,et al.Households′ willingness toaccept compensation for agricultural wasterecycling:Takingbiogas production from livestock manure waste in Hubei,P.R.China as an example[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,131(9):410-420.[6]郭利京,王颖.农户生物农药施用为何“说一套,做一套”？[J].华中农业大学学报,2018(4):71-80.[7]傅新红,宋汶庭．农户生物农药购买意愿及购买行为的影响因素分析:以四川省为例[J]．农业技术经济,2010(6):120-128.[8]吕美晔.菜农种植方式选择行为的影响因素研究：基于菜农意愿选择与实际选择差异的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2009(2):48-53.[9]潘丹,孔凡斌.养殖户环境友好型畜禽粪便处理方式选择行为分析：以生猪养殖为例[J].中国农村经济,2015(9):17-29.[10]王舒娟,王翌秋.秸秆出售行为与意愿选择差异的影响因素研究：基于江苏省624户农户的调查数据[J].农村经济,2014(6):55-59.[11]王学婷,何可，张俊飚，等.农户对环境友好型技术的采纳意愿及异质性分析：以湖北省为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2018(6):197-209.[12]陈振,郭杰,欧名豪.农户农地转出意愿与转出行为的差异分析[J].资源科学,2018(10):2039-2047.[13]王建华,刘茁,浦徐进.政策认知对生猪养殖户病死猪不当处理行为风险的影响分析[J].中国农村经济,2016(5):84-95.[14]赵微,周惠,杨钢桥，等.农民参与农地整理项目建后管护的意愿与行为转化研究:以河南邓州的调查为例[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(3):55-62.[15]张鹏,张杰,马俊.考虑期望损失厌恶的供应链契约与协调[J].管理评论，2015,27(4):177-186.[16]唐艳.有机认证制度下农户减量施肥意愿的影响因素分析:基于四川省1 061户农民的调查[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019(10):29-34.[17]吴雪莲,张俊飚,丰军辉.农户绿色农业技术认知影响因素及其层级结构分解:基于Probit-ISM模型[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(5):135-145.[18]侯林岐,张杰,翟雪玲.社会规范、生态认知与农户地膜回收行为研:来自新疆1 056户棉农调研问卷[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019(12):54-59.[19]褚彩虹,冯淑怡,张蔚文.农户采用环境友好型农业技术行为的实证分析:以有机肥与测土配方施肥技术为例[J].中国农村经济,2012(3)：68-77.[20]杨泳冰,胡浩,王益文.农户以商品有机肥替代化肥的行为分析:基于江苏南通市228户调查数据[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2012(6):1-6.[21]陈利顶,马岩.农户经营行为及其对生态环境的影响[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):691-697．[22]钟文晶,罗必良.公共政策及其响应:基于农民信任机制的解释:以农地确权政策为例[J].中国农村观察,2020(3):42-59.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-01-14