|Table of Contents|

Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation on RootCold Resistance of Six Grape Varieties

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年17
Page:
30-37
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation on RootCold Resistance of Six Grape Varieties
Author(s):
SUN Yan; LI Minmin; HAN Bin; YIN Yonggang; ZHAO Shengjian; GUO Zijuan
(Changli Fruit Research Institute,Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Changli,Hebei 066600)
Keywords:
grape; root; cold resistance indexes; comprehensive evaluation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20210488
Abstract:
Roots of annual cutting seedlings of 6 grape varieties,included ‘Zuoshan1’‘5C’‘5BB’‘SO4’‘Red Globe’ and ‘Kyoho’ were selected as experimental materials.The relative conductivity (REC),total water content,free water content,the hardness and total work of roots were measured.And then semi-lethal temperature (LT50) was obtained from the Logistic equation.The data were processed using membership function value method,system cluster and correlation analysis to comprehensively evaluate cold resistance of every variety to explore more suitable evaluation methods of cold resistance of grape.In order to provide reference for the establishment of evaluation method system on cold resistance and cold-resistant breeding work in grape.The results showed that the REC of 6 grape varieties gradually increased with decreasing temperature.Total water content,free water content and the ratio of free water content to bound water content (F/B) in ‘Zuoshan1’ were significantly lower than those in other grape varieties.The cross cutting hardness,cross cutting total work and longitudinal cutting total work were all significantly higher in ‘Zuoshan1’ than those in other grape varieties,respectively.‘Red Globe’ had the maximum content in total water content,free water content and F/B,in which there were significant differences between ‘Red Globe’ and other grape varieties (P<0.05),respectively.The cross cutting hardness,cross cutting total work,longitudinal cutting hardness and longitudinal cutting total work were all the least in ‘Red Globe’,and showed significant differences between ‘Red Globe’ and other varieties,respectively.According to cluster analysis result,6 grape varieties could be divided into 3 groups,‘Zuoshan1’ was of high cold resistance,‘5C’‘5BB’ and ‘SO4’ were of moderate cold resistance,‘Kyoho’ and ‘Red Globe’ were of low cold resistance.The order of the cold resistance according to the average membership function value was ‘Zuoshan1’>‘SO4’>‘5BB’>‘5C’>‘Kyoho’>‘Red Globe’.Correlation analysis showed that LT50 had aextremely significantly positive correlation with total water content,free water content and F/B and a aextremely significantly negative correlation with cross cutting total work.LT50 was negatively related to longitudinal cutting hardness and longitudinal cutting total work.It was concluded that total water content,free water content,F/B,cross cutting hardness,cross cutting total work,longitudinal cutting hardness and longitudinal cutting total work could be evaluation indexes of grape cold resistance.It was more scientific and accurate to combine system cluster and membership function value method on effectively evaluating cold resistance of grape.

References:

[1]高登涛，白茹，鲁晓燕，等.引入石河子地区的5个葡萄砧木抗寒性比较[J].果树学报，2015，32(2)：232-237.[2]范宗民，孙军利，赵宝龙，等.不同砧木‘赤霞珠’葡萄枝条抗寒性比较[J].果树学报，2020，37（2）：215-225.[3]BEHESHTI ROOY S S,HOSSEINI SALEKDEH G,GHABOOLI M,et al.Cold-induced physiological and biochemical responses of three grapevine cultivars differing in cold tolerance[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2017,39(12):264.[4]杨豫，张晓煜，陈仁伟，等.不同品种酿酒葡萄根系抗寒性鉴定[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文)，2020，28(4)：558-565.[5]任静，郝燕，白耀栋，等.河西走廊‘贵人香’7个葡萄砧穗组合抗寒性的综合评价[J].甘肃农业大学学报，2019，54(4)：60-68.[6]王海鸥，高展，艾克拜尔·毛拉，等.自然越冬条件下17个葡萄砧木品种几个生理指标变化分析[J].经济林研究，2019，37(4)：120-128.[7]GAO Z,ZHAI H,DU Y P.Measurement of grape root firmness and its application to the evaluation of cold hardiness[J].Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research,2018,24(4):406.[8]鲁金星，姜寒玉，李唯.低温胁迫对砧木及酿酒葡萄枝条抗寒性的影响[J].果树学报，2012，29(6)：1040-1046.[9]王文举，张亚红，牛锦凤，等.电导法测定鲜食葡萄的抗寒性[J].果树学报，2007，24(1)：34-37.[10]何伟，艾军，范书田，等.葡萄品种及砧木抗寒性评价方法研究[J].果树学报，2015，32(6)：1135-1142.[11]高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京：高等教育出版社，2012.[12]张剑侠，吴行昶，杨亚州，等.引进美国制汁葡萄品种抗寒性的综合评价[J].北方园艺，2011(24)：1-5.[13]苏李维，李胜，马绍英，等.葡萄抗寒性综合评价方法的建立[J].草业学报，2015，24(3)：70-79.[14]李清亚，路斌，赵佳伟，等.不同豆梨品种对低温胁迫的生理响应及抗寒性评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)，2020，48(1)：86-94，110.[15]陈佰鸿，张彪，毛娟，等.葡萄枝条水分含量变化与抗寒性关系[J].植物生理学报，2014，50(4)：535-541.[16]LI P H,SAKAI A.Plant cold hardiness and freezing stress[M].Pittsburgh:Academic Press,1978.[17]何伟，艾军，杨义明，等.山葡萄种质资源枝条的低温半致死温度研究[J].北方园艺，2014(21)：19-22.[18]陈洁，金晓玲，宁阳，等.3种含笑属植物抗寒生理指标的筛选及评价[J].河南农业科学，2016，45(2)：113-118.[19]SU L,DAI Z,LI S,et al.A novel system for evaluating drought-cold tolerance of grapevines using chlorophyll fluorescence[J].BMC Plant Biology,2015,15(1):82.[20]白茹，高登涛，刘怀锋，等.引入石河子地区的葡萄砧木抗寒性研究[J].新疆农业科学，2015，52(2)：210-216.[21]周香云，李爽，李连国，等.低温胁迫对8种葡萄砧木根系细胞膜透性影响的研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版)，2012，33(4)：51-53.[22]房用，李秀芬，慕宗昭，等.茶树抗寒性研究进展[J].经济林研究，2004,22(2)：69-72.[23]相昆，张美勇，徐颖，等.不同核桃品种耐寒特性综合评价[J].应用生态学报，2011，22(9)：2325-2330.[24]龚月桦，周永学，樊军锋，等.美国黄松、班克松和油松的抗寒性比较[J].应用生态学报,2006，17(8)：1389-1392.[25]杨玉珍，陈刚，彭方仁，等.低温胁迫下不同种源香椿含水量和渗透调节物质含量差异及其与抗寒性的相关性[J].植物资源与环境学报，2014(4)：47-54.[26]TURMANINA V.On the strength of tree roots[J].Bull Moscow Soc Nat Biol Sect,1965,70:36-45.[27]李谦，周本智，安艳飞，等.绿竹根系分布及生物力学性质[J].应用生态学报，2014，25(5)：1319-1326.[28]赵绍宇，李宜达，吴君怡，等.油松和刺槐林木单根含水量对抗拉强度的影响分析[J].南昌工程学院学报，2017，36(4):48-53.[29]袁军伟，郭紫娟，马爱红，等.葡萄砧木抗寒性的鉴定与综合评价[J].中国农学通报，2013，29(4)：99-103.[30]付晓伟，张倩，刘崇怀，等.评价葡萄根系抗寒性指标的确定[J].果树学报，2014，31(1)：52-59.[31]郑凯翔，王旺田，刘文瑜，等.外源硅调控葡萄生理特性对低温胁迫的响应[J].分子植物育种，2020，18(3)：1013-1019.[32]JING L,WANG Y Q,HAN X P,et al.Evaluation of cold hardiness of seven loquat accessions[J].Acta Hort,2015,1092(28):191-198.[33]李桂荣，程珊珊，张少伟，等.葡萄抗寒相关生理生化指标灰色关联分析[J].东北林业大学学报，2018，46(10)：40-47，53.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-12-09