|Table of Contents|

Research on China′s Environmental Ecological Compensation Mechanism Based on Material Flow Information

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年10
Page:
165-172
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on China′s Environmental Ecological Compensation Mechanism Based on Material Flow Information
Author(s):
YIN Li
(College of Fine Arts and Design，Xinyang Normal University,Xinyang,Henan 464000)
Keywords:
ecological compensation mechanism; market-oriented construction; systemic; material flow; financing channels
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20204526
Abstract:
The report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that a market-oriented and diversified environmental and ecological compensation mechanism should be established，which pointed out the direction for my country′s current environmental and ecological governance and long-term management.At present，there are problems in the construction of my country′s environmental and ecological compensation mechanism，such as lack of systemic law and regulation system，single source of funds，limited scope of implementation，and single method.The main reasons include the imperfect market mechanism of ecological compensation，insufficient government investment，and lack of a standardized trading platform.In view of the current status quo，measures could be taken to improve the relevant laws and regulations of the ecological compensation mechanism，broaden the financing channels of ecological compensation，and expand the scope of ecological compensation.This study had further improved the construction of the environmental ecological mechanism.

References:

[1]张琪慧，王正早，王沐丹，等.深化水资源水环境政策改革,积极推动环境社会治理：PACE 20周年纪念大会会议综述[J].中国环境管理，2017,9(5)：19-21.[2]沈满洪，谢慧明.跨界流域生态补偿的“新安江模式”及可持续制度安排[J].中国人口?资源与环境，2020,30(9)：156-163.[3]曹明德，马腾.生态环境损害赔偿诉讼和环境公益诉讼的法理关系探微[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)，2021，39（2）：1-10.[4]陈晓勤.我国生态补偿立法分析[J].海峡法学，2011,13(1)：58-62.[5]张倩，范明明.生态补偿能否保护草场生态?:基于阿拉善左旗的案例研究[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)，2020,37(3)：36-46.[6]崔奇，俞海，王勇，等.长江经济带绿色发展:关于状态、特征与制约的文献综述[J].环境与可持续发展，2020,45(3)：79-85.[7]AUGUSTYNCZIK A L D.Habitat amount and connectivity in forest planning models：Consequences for profitability and compensation schemes[J].Journal of Environmental Management，2021,283：111982.[8]ACUA-ALONSO C，FERNANDES A C P，LVAREZ X，et al.Water security and watershed management assessed through the modelling of hydrology and ecological integrity：A study in the Galicia-Costa (NW Spain)[J].Science of the Total Environment，2021,759：143905. [9]FU B，SU C，WEI Y，et al.Double counting in ecosystem services valuation：Causes and countermeasures[J].Ecological Research，2011,26(1)：1-14.[10]NEUGARTEN R A，MOULL K，MARTINEZ N A，et al.Trends in protected area representation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in five tropical countries[J].Ecosystem Services，2020,42：101078.[11]COATES R I，AGUIRRE A，CAMPOS-VILLANUEVA .Plant use by artisans within the los tuxtlas biosphere reserve，Southern Mexico[J].Human Ecology，2015,43(4)：621-631.[12]MENG Y，LIU M，GUAN X，et al.Comprehensive evaluation of ecological compensation effect in the Xiaohong River Basin，China[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research，2019,26(8)：7793-7803.[13]XIONG Z，LI H.Ecological deficit tax：A tax design and simulation of compensation for ecosystem service value based on ecological footprint in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production，2019,230：1128-1137.[14]符正平，麦景琦.生态省试点与可持续发展能力:基于生态足迹视角[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版)，2021,61(2)：176-186.[15]樊鹏飞，梁流涛，许明军，等.基于虚拟耕地流动视角的省际耕地生态补偿研究[J].中国人口?资源与环境，2018,28(1)：91-101.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-08-23