|Table of Contents|

Effects of Unbagging Cultivation on Fruit Quality of Red Fuji Apple

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年10
Page:
41-47
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Unbagging Cultivation on Fruit Quality of Red Fuji Apple
Author(s):
YANG Wenyue; GAO Meina; YIN Baoying; LIANG Bowen; LI Zhongyong; XU Jizhong
(College of Horticulture，Hebei Agriculture University，Baoding，Hebei 017000)
Keywords:
apple; unbagged cultivation; organic acid content; wax; fruit quality
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20203709
Abstract:
Taking six-year-old ‘Tianhong No.2’/SH40/Malusrobusta as experimental materials,the main components and contents of organic acids, the content of titratable acid and the content of soluble total sugar, and the dynamic analysis of fruit growth indexes during the fruit development process were studied by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), acid-base neutralization titration and ananthone colorimetric method to determine the effect of unbagging on the fruit quality of Fuji apple. The results showed that the single fruit weight of fruit without bagging were higher than that of bagging.During fruit development，soluble sugar content and soluble sugar content of fruits treated with bagging and without bagging all showed an upward trend.At the maturity stage of fruits，soluble sugar content of fruits treated without bagging was higher than that of fruits bagged.In addition，the contents of titratable acid，malic acid，fumaric acid，citric acid and succinic acid in fruits without bagging were all lower than those of bagging.There was significant difference in titratable acid content between bagged and unbagged fruits 150 days after full-bloom，which were 0.40% and 0.36% respectively.The cracking index was low and the total amount of wax in fruit epidermis was high in fruit without bagging.

References:

[1]刘志坚,杨聚德.苹果套袋的回顾、反思和展望[J].北方果树,2012(6):46-48.[2]张永茂,韩明玉,李丙智,等.我国富士苹果无袋栽培建议[J].中国果树,2012(5):72-74.[3]蔡忠民,李俊才,王家珍,等.套袋对‘南果梨’果实品质的影响[J].中国果树,2017(S1):41-44.[4]邓瑞,袁仲玉,夏雪,等.套袋对“瑞雪”苹果果实品质的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(7):117-123.[5]张瑞芳.不套袋对苹果品质的影响及果锈产生主要因素分析[D].杨凌：西北农林科技大学,2019.[6]王海波,陈学森,辛培刚,等.几个早熟苹果品种果实糖酸组分及风味品质的评价[J].果树学报,2007(4):513-516.[7]王贵平,翟浩,陈汝,等.不同类型果袋微环境对富士苹果果实发育和品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(17):138-142.[8]邓瑞,袁仲玉,夏雪,等.瑞阳苹果套袋与不套袋果实品质的比较分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2019,54(1):74-79，88.[9]吴世涛.套袋对柚果实色泽变化及品质的影响[D].福州：福建农林大学,2019.[10]孙艳,张媛,李中勇,等.套袋“红富士”苹果果实表皮结构的发育及其与裂纹的关系[J].北方园艺,2013(15):5-10.[11]姜启航.套袋对柚果实类胡萝卜素代谢和品质的影响[D].武汉：华中农业大学,2019.[12]魏志峰,李秋利,高登涛,等.果实套袋对果实品质影响研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(24):36-41.[13]吕娇阳.不套袋富士系苹果品种筛选及无袋栽培技术研究[D].杨凌：西北农林科技大学,2018.[14]翟浩,王贵平,李晓军,等.苹果无袋栽培对果实品质和安全性的影响[J].中国果树,2015(1):29-32.[15]CHEN C S,ZHANG D,WANG Y Q,et al.Effects of fruit bagging on the contents of phenolic compounds in the peel and flesh of ‘Golden Delicious’‘Red Delicious’,and‘Royal Gala’apples[J].Scientia Horticulturae，2012,142:68-73.[16]史娟.不同矮化中间砧对红富士苹果有机酸含量及相关代谢酶活性的影响[D].石家庄：河北农业大学,2015.[17]ZHANG Y Z，LI P M，CHENG L L.Developmental changes of carbohydrates，organic acids，aminoacids，and phenolic compounds in ‘Honeycrisp’ apple flesh[J].Food Chemistry，2010，123(4):1013-1018.[18]KOCH R，ALLEWELDT G.Gergaswechsel reifender weinbeeren[J].Vitis,1978,17:30-44.[19]姜晓艳,李俊才,王家珍,等.套袋对‘早金酥’梨果实品质的影响[J].中国果树,2021(5):44-47.[20]SHARMA R R,REDDY S V R,JHALEGAR M J.Pre-harvest fruit bagging：A useful approach for plant protection and improved post-harvest fruit quality[J].Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology，2014,89:101-113.[21]GRASSWITZ T R,FIMBRES O.Efficacy of a physical method for control of direct pests of apples and peaches[J].Appl Entomol Zool，2013,137(10):36-47.[22]刘铁铮,付雅丽,智福军,等.红富士苹果果实裂纹的研究[J].天津农业科学,2011,17(1):71-74.[23]孙艳.不同立地条件下红富士苹果果实表皮结构的差异及与裂纹的关系[D].石家庄：河北农业大学,2013.[24]JENKS M A，ANDERSEN L，TEUSINK R S.Leaf cuticular waxes of potted rose cultivars as affected by plant development，drought and paclobutrazol treatments[J].Physiologia Plantarum，2001，112：62-70.[25]李慧峰,吕德国,刘国成,等.套袋对苹果果皮特征的影响[J].果树学报,2006，23(3):326-329.[26]王永旭.苹果不同生长发育时期表皮蜡质成分与晶体结构研究[D].泰安：山东农业大学,2019.[27]朱守亮,袁建琦,董晓庆.苹果果皮蜡质的研究进展[J].贵州农业科学,2016,44(2):120-124.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-08-09