|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Morphological Characters and Dry Matter Accumulation ofAndrographis paniculata

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年12
Page:
111-116
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Morphological Characters and Dry Matter Accumulation ofAndrographis paniculata
Author(s):
CHEN DongliangJIAN ShaofenWEI KunhuaMIAO JianhuaZHONG Chu
(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Medicinal Resources Protection and Genetic Improvement,Guangxi Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants,Nanning,Guangxi 530023)
Keywords:
Andrographis paniculataplant growth regulatordry matter accumulation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20203297
Abstract:
The Guangxi local variety Andrographis paniculata was used as test material,and the greenhouse potting method was adopted,five commonly used plant growth regulators in production were selected to research the effects of different plant growth regulators on morphological characters and dry matter accumulation of Androgrcaphis paniculata,including NAA,6-BA,eBR,CCC and GA3,in order to provide reference for increasing the yield of Chinese medicinal materials.The results showed that the treatments of 200 mg·L-1,400 mg·L-1 and 600 mg·L-1 GA3 could significantly increase the plant height of Andrographis paniculata (P<0.05),and the leaves were obviously enlarged.Among them,spraying 400 mg·L-1 GA3 increased the plant height extremely significantly (P<0.01),and spraying 400 mg·L-1 GA3,the biomass of single plant significantly increased by 20.97% (P<0.05),but the leaf-to-stem ratio decreased while increasing the biomass per plant.Although the biomass of single plant of Andrographis paniculata in each CCC treatments decreased in different degrees,50 mg·L-1 CCC could significantly increase the leaf-to-stem ratio (P<0.05).Each treatment concentration of 6-BA and NAA inhibited dry matter accumulation on Andrographis paniculata.In summary,spraying 400 mg·L-1 GA3 can significantly increase the biomass of single plant,but 6-BA and NAA are not suitable for the production of Andrographis paniculata.

References:

[1]国家药典委员会.中国药典(一部)[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2015.[2]RAINA A P,DUTTA M,VEENA G,et al.Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Wall.ex Nees (Kalmegh),a traditional hepatoprotective drug from India[J].Genetic Resources Crop Evolution,2013,60:1181-1189.[3]KUMAR A,DORA J,SINGH A,et al.A review on King of Bitter (Kalmegh)[J].IJRPC,2012,2(1):116-124.[4]LATTO S K,DHAR R S,KHAN S,et al.Comparative analysis of genetic diversity using molecular and morphometric markers in Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees[J].Genet Resour Crop Evol,2008,55:33-43.[5]张锋,潘康标,田子华.植物生长调节剂研究进展及应用对策[J].现代农业科技,2012(1):193-195.[6]刘惠卿,刘铁城,胡炳义,等.ABT生根粉浸种对人参生长的影响[J].中药材,1990,13(8):8.[7]徐光.ABT生根粉在地黄栽培中的应用[J].中药材,1991,14(5):8-9.[8]徐昭玺,李志亮,刘玉琇,等.植物植物生长调节剂对浙贝母的增产作用[J].中药通报,1988,13(12):15-16.[9]孟繁莹,王铁生,王化民,等.MET等植物生长调节剂在西洋参上的应用效应[J].特产研究,1994(2):7-8,11.[10]门敬菊,王振月,王宗权.植物生长调节剂对毛脉酸模根中白藜芦醇及白藜芦醇苷的影响[J].中医药学报,2011,39(5):60-62.[11]刘效瑞,刘荣清,伍克俊,等.植物生长调节剂在当归上的应用效果[J].甘肃农业科技,1994(5):13-14.[12]王建安,吴霞,徐增莱,等.植物生长调节剂对盾叶薯蓣产量及薯蓣皂苷元含量的影响[J].中国现代应用药学,2009,26(12):996-999.[13]侯凯,陈郡雯,翟娟园,等.植物生长调节剂对川白芷生长发育及其产量品质的影响[J].中国中药杂志,2013,38(13):2082-2085.[14]康毅华,门敬菊,王宗权,等.植物生长调节剂对毛脉酸模根中蒽醌类成分及生物量的影响[J].中医药学报,2010,38(3):71-74.[15]池剑亭,申亚琳,舒位恒,等.油菜素内酯促进药用植物青蒿中青蒿素的生物合成[J].中国科学院大学学报,2015,32(4):476-481.[16]魏赫,王莹,金红宇,等.植物生长调节剂研究进展及其在中药种植中使用和检测[J].中国药学杂志,2016,51(2):81-85.[17]翟宇瑶,郭宝林,黄文华.“壮根灵”类药剂检测及植物生长延缓剂在根及根茎类道地药材栽培中使用情况调查[J].中国中药杂志,2015,40(3):414-420.[18]张丽霞,牟燕,杨美华,等.植物生长调节剂在中药材中的应用及安全性评价研究进展[J].中国中药杂志,2020,45(8):1824-1832.[19]刘晟楠,魏惠珍,殷文静,等.不同产地不同部位3种穿心莲内酯成分研究[J].时珍国医国药,2016,27(6):1483-1484.[20]祝晨蔯,莫建霞.规范化种植穿心莲药材HPLC指纹图谱研究[J].中国药学杂志,2004,40(10):737-739.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-09-27