|Table of Contents|

Comparisons of Morphological and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Four Lycium barbarum L.Cultivars (Strains) Under Root-limited Cultivation

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年09
Page:
119-124
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparisons of Morphological and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Four Lycium barbarum L.Cultivars (Strains) Under Root-limited Cultivation
Author(s):
LI Xiaoying1HE Jun1TIAN Ying2ZHU Lizhen2WANG Zhenping2WANG Shiping3
(1.Wolfberry Engineering Technology Institute,Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750002;2.College of Agriculture,Ningxia University,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750021;3.College of Agriculture and Biology,Shanghai Communication University,Shanghai 200240)
Keywords:
Lycium barbarum.L.root-limitionmorphological growthphotosynthetic characteristics
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20202771
Abstract:
Taking wolfberry cultivars ‘Ningqi No.1’ and ‘Ningqi No.7’,wolfberry strains ‘1401’ and‘1402’ as the test materials.The methods of growth index investigation and photosynthetic characteristics determination were used to analysis the differences of plant growth and photosynthetic characteristics of four Lycium barbarum L.cultivars (strains)under the root-limited cultivation.In order to explore the morphological growth and photosynthetic characteristics of different Lycium barbarum L. cultivars (strains) in root-limited cultivation.The results showed that ‘1401’ and ‘1402’ had better growth indexes relative to the other two cultivars ‘Ningqi No.1’‘Ningqi No.7’.The net photosynthetic rate (Pn),intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci),transpiration rate (Tr),stomatal conductance (Gs) were higher than ‘Ningqi No.1’ and ‘Ningqi No.7’.The SPAD and water use efficiency (WUE) of ‘1401’ were the lowest.Through comprehensive analysis,it is concluded that ‘1402’ is more suitable for the root-limited cultivation.

References:

[1]白寿宁.宁夏枸杞研究[M].银川:宁夏出版社,1999.[2]朱永兴,韩学宏,武东坡,等.枸杞道地性与其根际微生物的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(34):40-43.[3]王世平,张才喜,罗菊花,等.果树根域限制栽培研究进展[J].果树学报,2002(5):298-301.[4]WANG B,HE J J,DUAN C Q,et al.Root restriction affects anthocyanin accumulation and composition in the berry skin of ‘kyoho’ grape (Vitis vinifera L.× Vinitis labrusca L.) during ripening[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2012,137:20-28.[5]BYERS R,CARBAUGE D,COMBS L.The influence of root restriction on flowering,fruiting,tree growth,yields,and fruit quality of apple trees[J].Hort Science,2000,35(3):418.[6]林诗源,颜子林,张译文,等.根域调控对苹果树根际土壤水分及树体生长的影响[J].南方农业,2019,13(26):13-14.[7]庞钰洁,竺啸恒,陶宁颖,等.根域限制栽培对主干形桃幼树生长及成花的影响[J].上海农业学报,2019,35(5):33-38.[8]潘兵青,刘萍,张文文,等.根域限制下不同留果量对设施红地球葡萄生长的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2019,25(12):52-54,115.[9]王博,何建军,李节法,等.根域限制对‘巨峰’葡萄花色苷代谢途径关键基因表达的影响[J].果树学报,2015,32(1):19-25.[10]刘松忠,刘军,武阳,等.梨幼树部分根域有机肥改良对生长与生理特性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2015,24(9):98-103.[11]高清华,叶正文,李世诚,等.限根结合地膜覆盖对设施果树根际温度变化的影响[J].上海农业学报,2005(3):80-82.[12]张承林,BRAVDO B A.根系限制对对酿酒葡萄生长发育的影响[J].园艺学报,2001,28(5):448-450.[13]王世平,许文平,张才喜.葡萄根域限制栽培技术研究进展[C].上海:中国园艺学会第八届青年学术讨论会暨现代园艺论坛,2008.[14]BOLAND A M,JERIE P H,MITCHELL P D,et al.Long-term effects of restricted root volume and regulated deficit irrigation on peach growth and mineral nutrition[J].Hort Science,2000,125(1):135-142.[15]舒海波,贺超兴,王怀松,等.园艺作物限根栽培技术研究进展[J].农业科技通讯,2009(4):85-88.[16]何昕孺,戴国礼,焦恩宁.限根栽培对枸杞根域温度、生物量积累及营养元素吸收的影响[J].西北农业学报,2017,26(2):281-286.[17]许大全.气孔运动与光合作用[J].植物生理学报,1984(6):8-14.[18]徐倩,赵燕.冀芦沙,等.园林植物的光合作用研究进展[J].黑龙江农业科学,2020(2):142-145.[19]李勇,方伟超,朱更瑞,等.双容器与控根器限根对桃树生长发育的影响[J].果树学报,2014,31(2):213-220.[20]张晓娜,王有科,李捷.9个枸杞品种叶光合气体交换参数与果实品质的对比分析[J].四川农业大学学报,2014,32(2):148-153.[21]郑淑霞,上官周平.8种阔叶树种叶片气体交换特征和叶绿素荧光特性比较[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1080-1087.[22]谢兆森,王世平.根域限制栽培果树节水提质机理[J].河北林业科技,2014,5(6):128-131.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-08-06