|Table of Contents|

Effects of Gongzhulingmycin on the Growth and Fruits Quality on Strawberry

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年05
Page:
42-47
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Gongzhulingmycin on the Growth and Fruits Quality on Strawberry
Author(s):
DU Qian1; ZHANG Xueming1; ZHANG Zhengkun1; ZHENG Yajie1; JI Dongming2; LI Qiyun1
(1.Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Jilin Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology,Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northeast,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Changchun,Jilin 130033；2.Siping City Plant Protection Station,Siping,Jilin 136000)
Keywords:
gongzhulingmycin; strawberry (Fragaria xananassa Duch.); growth promoting; improving quality
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20202374
Abstract:
Taking strawberry as material,the characters of plant and fruit were investigated in field plot and greenhouse control experiments,so as to determine and define the effect on growth and quality of strawberry by applying gongzhulingmycin.The results showed that transplanting survival rate of ‘Gongzhu No.4’ strawberry and ‘Gongzhu No.3’ strawberry were 82.46% and 84.57%,which were higher than the control as the ratio of 32.68% and 18.15% respectively in the pouring root treatments with the water extract of gongzhulingmycin after transplanting.The characters of plant height,petiole length,leaf length,leaf width,the leaf number,crown diameter were all better than the control,and the leaf size and leaf number were more significant than the control in the treatments.The optimum application concentration for pouring root was 100× during the process of transplanting.The phenological period of strawberry were not significant among the treatments of spraying,pouring and mixed method of them,but the method of pouring could improve the character of fruit more significant than other two methods.The maximum fruit weight and average fruit weight of strawberry were improved by the ratio of 12.18% and 13.79% higher than those of the control,respectively.The soluble solids content and fruit firmness were increased significantly.The results showed that application of gongzhulingmycin can improve the growth and quality of strawberry in field.

References:

[1]张勇,汤浩茹,罗娅,等.草莓FaCBF1基因的克隆及表达分析[J].园艺学报,2014,41(2):240-248.[2]万清林,赵书清.草莓果实营养成份的分析[J].北方园艺,1994(6):34-35.[3]王素素,杜国栋,杨旭.木霉菌剂对连作草莓的影响[J].河北果树,2018(5):11-13,15,27.[4]史宝胜,郭润芳,尹家凤,等.3种防治剂对重茬大棚草莓生长的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2005,24(增刊):38-42.[5]刘彩云,赵静.生防菌株LB-1培养液对黄瓜的抑病促生作用[J].植物病理学报,2020,50(6):93-100.[6]贾瑞敏,胡礼芳,王彤彤,等.三株生防菌对甘蓝根肿病的防治效果及促生作用研究[J].中国生物防治学报,2020,36(3):89-97.[7]SHI L M,NWET T T,GE B B,et al.Antifungal and plant growth-promoting activities of Streptomyces roseoflavus strain NKZ-259[J].Biological Control,2018,125:57-64.[8]吴新兰,庞志超.代汞拌种剂农抗“769”防病作用的研究[J].吉林农业科学,1979(1):35-38.[9]王志田.农抗“769”拌种防治小麦、糜子黑穗病[J].新疆农业科学,1980(3):19.[10]许剑锐.农抗“769”防治禾谷类作物黑穗病的效果[J].植物保护,1982(6):21.[11]王德茂,高玉斌,张海余,等.公主岭霉素复合剂的研究[J].生物防治通报,1986(2):89-91.[12]赵密珍.草莓种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.[13]张菁,连清贵,陈婧,等.淡紫拟青霉QLP12对感染灰霉病后番茄植株的促生作用及抗病相关酶活性变化[J].植物保护学报,2018,45(5):1088-1095.[14]van PEER R.Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp.strain WCS417[J].Phytopathology,1991,81:728-734.[15]WHIPPS J M.Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2001,52(S1):487-511.[16]李德全,钱亚明,周鸣鸣,等.海洋细菌NH-8防治草莓灰霉病机理及其抗菌物质分析[J].植物保护学报,2016,43(2):215-221.[17]王勇,周冬梅,郭坚华.蜡质芽孢杆菌AR156对辣椒的防病促生机理研究[J].植物病理学报,2014,44(2):195-203.[18]杨晓云,陈志谊,蒋盼盼,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌B1619对番茄的促生作用[J].中国生物防治学报,2016,32(3):349-356.[19]邱光,张新凤,李建伟,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌B1619对草莓保苗促生效果[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(4):98-100.[20]张红丹,杜茜,张正坤,等.放线菌769抑菌谱及液体培养生长曲线的测定[J].中国植保导刊,2010,30(7):5-9.[21]杜茜,初佳芮,郭永霞,等.不吸水链霉菌公主岭变种诱导大豆抗病性与根际土壤微环境的变化[J].大豆科学,2020,39(1):97-107.[22]杜茜,初佳芮,汪洋洲,等.不吸水链霉菌公主岭新变种对大豆生长和产量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(6):130-132,161.[23]安俊霞,李晓光,汪洋洲,等.公主岭霉素在水稻育秧期应用技术研究[J].东北农业科学,2019(2):28-33.[24]安俊霞,张正坤,李晓光,等.公主岭霉素对水稻稻瘟病田间防治效果[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(34):130-134.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-06-07