|Table of Contents|

Effects of Four Grafting Methods on the Growth of Melon Seedlings

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年04
Page:
40-45
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Four Grafting Methods on the Growth of Melon Seedlings
Author(s):
LIU Ming; LI Mengzhu; SUN Qiyu; HUANG Yuan; BIE Zhilong
(Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology，Ministry of Education/College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences，Huazhong Agricultural University，Wuhan，Hubei 430070)
Keywords:
melon; grafting method; grafting efficiency; healing; sprout removal time
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20201413
Abstract:
This experiment was conducted to compare the effects of four grafting methods on grafting efficiency and growth of melon seedlings，‘Texuan No.1’ melon as scion，and ‘Yinguang’ pumpkin as rootstock.The results showed that the hole insertion grafting had the fastest grafting speed and the highest grafting efficiency，the grafting survival rate was obtained from the improved hole insertion grafting method under 28 ℃/18 ℃ condition.The grafting healing time of improved hole insertion grafting and splice grafting with root pruning was shorter than the other grafting methods.At the one true leaf stage，the grafted seedlings from improved hole insertion grafting and the hole insertion grafting had obvious growth advantages，and the root system was the best from improved hole insertion grafting method.At the three true leaf stage，the grafted seedlings of melon with root pruning grafting and splice grafting with root pruning grew fast and had high seedling strength index.The number and time of sprout removal were different for different grafting methods.Root pruning grafting had the least number and shortest time of sprout removal，and sprout removal time for root pruning grafting method was only 46.3% of hole insertion grafting method.

References:

[1]杨念,王蔚宇,曹春意,等.我国甜瓜产业发展现状及趋势分析[J].中国瓜菜,2019,32(8):50-54.[2]GOLDSCHMIDT E E.Plant grafting:New mechanisms，evolutionary implications[J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2014(5):727.[3]THOMAS R,FRANK M H.Connecting the pieces:Uncovering the molecular basis for long-distance communication through plant grafting[J].The New Phytologist,2019,223:582-589.[4]RIGA P.Effect of rootstock on growth，fruit production and quality of tomato plants grown under low temperature and light conditions[J].Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology,2015,56:626-638.[5]LEE J M,KUBOTA C,TSAO S J,et al.Current status of vegetable grafting:Diffusion，grafting techniques，automation[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2010,127:93-105.[6]肖守华,马德源,刘淑梅,等.西瓜嫁接苗的应用现状及改进方案[J].中国蔬菜,2013(3):17-21.[7]华斌,黄远,万正杰,等.不同昼温和光照强度对西瓜断根嫁接苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].长江蔬菜,2014(4)：27-30.[8]朱进,别之龙,许传波,等.小西瓜断根插接穴盘育苗技术[J].长江蔬菜,2007(11):18-19.[9]王朋成,严从生,江海坤,等.瓜类蔬菜南瓜砧木“双断根贴接法”应用效果及关键技术[J].安徽农学通报,2014,20(23):53,82.[10]朱进,别之龙,黄远,等.不同嫁接方法对黄瓜嫁接功效和嫁接苗生长的影响[J].中国蔬菜,2006(9):24-25.[11]葛晓光.蔬菜育苗大全[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.[12]郑康,程菲,别之龙.不同嫁接方法对番茄嫁接工效和嫁接苗种苗质量的影响[J].长江蔬菜,2019(2):20-24.[13]吴金锋,李治红,李岩,等.黄瓜不同嫁接方法比较评价[J].山东农业科学,2018,50(7):92-94.[14]林燚,杨喻斌,朱正斌.不同嫁接方法对早佳嫁接西瓜产量的影响[J].上海蔬菜,2005(3):74-75.[15]苏长跃,史庆华,焦自高,等.不同嫁接方式对甜瓜幼苗生理代谢的影响[J].山东农业科学,2014,46(6):44-47.[16]刘方园,黄远,黎煊,等.愈合期不同温度和光照处理对甜瓜嫁接苗生长的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2019,32(3):18-21.[17]叶林,刘雅丽,郝文魁,等.不同嫁接方法对温室黄瓜幼苗质量的影响[J].北方园艺,2014(16):41-43.[18]许勇,宫国义,刘国栋,等.西瓜嫁接新技术：断根嫁接法[J].中国西瓜甜瓜,2002(4):38-39.[19]马庆,赵瑞,陈俊琴,等.嫁接方法对黄瓜嫁接效率、秧苗质量及初期产量的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2012,35(6):18-22.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-06-07