|Table of Contents|

Numerical Classification of Tree Peony and Herbaceous Peony Cultivars Based on Flower Color Phenotype

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年03
Page:
66-75
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Numerical Classification of Tree Peony and Herbaceous Peony Cultivars Based on Flower Color Phenotype
Author(s):
WU Fangfang1MIAO Runtian1WANG Anyin1LI Xiaokang2HE Dan1ZHANG Man1
(1.College of Forestry,Agricultural University of Henan,Zhengzhou,Henan 450002;2.Zhengzhou Botanical Garden,Zhengzhou,Henan 450002)
Keywords:
Paeonia suffruticosaPaeonia lactifloraflower color phenotypenumerical classificationISCC-NBS method of designating colors
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20200741
Abstract:
Paeonia cultivars were flower color phenotyped by chromatic aberration meter using 38 tree peony and 14 herbaceous peony species as test materials,the quantity classification of Paeonia cultivars were investigated,in order to provide a theoretical basis for identification,classification and flower color breeding of Paeonia.The results showed that the results obtained by cluster analysis could not scientifically characterize the classification characteristics of tree peony and herbaceous peony flowers.The ISCC-NBS color name notation defines the color more accurately.The tree peony cultivars were classified into nine groups,including yellow group,white group,green group,light pink group,pink purple group,pink red group,red group,red purple group and red black group;the herbaceous peony cultivars were classified into five groups,including white group,light pink group,pink red group,red group and red black group.What′s more,the flower color of the Paeonia cultivars was various and exists obvious difference among different cultivar groups.

References:

[1]陈耀华.牡丹的花色与品种分类[J].花木盆景(花卉园艺),2001(3):14.[2]韩雪源,张延龙,牛立新.39个牡丹品种的形态学分类研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(9):128-136.[3]周宝臻.芍药属部分种和栽培品种的亲缘关系研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009.[4]解梦珺.牡丹芍药远缘杂交胚珠、胚培养及F1代种子萌发的研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2017.[5]高小峰.牡丹、芍药组间远缘杂交花粉萌发及胚胎发育的形态学研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2015.[6]洪德元,潘开玉.芍药属牡丹组的分类历史和分类处理[J].植物分类学报,1999,37(4):351-368.[7]张道海,吴诗华.关于中国牡丹历史起源及分类的探讨[J].中国园林,1997(2):5-7.[8]朱云娜.北京地区芍药品种花色与叶色调查分析[C].哈尔滨:中国园艺学会观赏园艺专业委员会2008年学术年会,2008.[9]庞利铮,成仿云,钟原,等.紫斑牡丹关联分析群体的表型分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(6):115-120.[10]王峰,杨树华,常智慧,等.月季种质资源花色基础研究[J].草原与草坪,2017(2):83-88.[11]GONNET J F.CIELab measurement,a precise communication in flower color:An example with carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) cultivars[J].Journal of Horticultural Science,1993,68(4):499-510.[12]姜文龙,范俊俊,张丹丹,等.观赏海棠不同叶位色彩特征及特异种质挖掘[J].园艺学报,2017,44(6):1135-1144.[13]张圆圆,齐冬梅,刘辉,等.观赏向日葵的花色多样性及其与花青苷的关系[J].园艺学报,2008,35(6):863-868.[14]夏婷,耿兴敏,罗凤霞.不同花色野生百合色素成分分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2013,41(5):109-113.[15]丁苏芹,孙忆,李玺,等.小苍兰品种花色表型数量分类研究[J].北方园艺,2019(4):91-97.[16]白新祥,胡可,戴思兰,等.不同花色菊花品种花色素成分的初步分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(5):84-89.[17]KELLY K L.Centroid notations for the revised ISCC-NBS color name blocks[J].Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards,1958,61:427.[18]洪艳,白新祥,孙卫,等.菊花品种花色表型数量分类研究[J].园艺学报,2012,39(7):1330-1340.[19]吴静,成仿云,钟原.紫斑牡丹花色表型数量分类研究[J].园艺学报,2016,43(5):947-956.[20]VOSS D H.Relating colorimeter measurement of plant color to the royal horticultural society colour chary[J].Hort Science,1992(27):1256-1260.[21]洪丽.茶条槭(Acer ginnala Maxim.)幼树叶色变化的生理特性研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.[22]SLINEY D H.Radiometric quantities and units used in photobiology and photochemistry:recommendations of the commission internationale de l′eclairage (international commission on illumination)[J].Photochemistry & Photobiology,2010,83(2):425-432.[23]姜文龙,范俊俊,张丹丹,等.观赏海棠不同叶位色彩特征及特异种质挖掘[J].园艺学报,2017,44(6):1135-1144.[24]胡永红,秦俊,蒋昌华,等.上海地区秋色叶成因的调查与分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2004(5):84-86.[25]BOASE M R,LEWIS D H,DAVIES K M,et al.Isolation and antisense suppression of flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase modifies flower pigments and colour in cyclamen[J].Bmc Plant Biology,2010,10(1):1-12.[26]韩江南,樊金玲,巩卫东,等.中原牡丹品种基于花色测定的聚类分析[J].北方园艺,2010(3):75-79.[27]白新祥.菊花花色形成的表型分析[D].北京:北京林业大学,2007.[28]HOSOKI T,HAMADA M,KANDO T,et al.Comparative study of anthocyanins in tree peony flowers[J].Journal of Horticultural Society,1991,60(2):395-403.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-06-04