|Table of Contents|

Analysis on Fruit Quality of Different Varieties of ‘Shushanggan Apricot’

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年01
Page:
36-41
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Analysis on Fruit Quality of Different Varieties of ‘Shushanggan Apricot’
Author(s):
CONG Guizhi; SHI You; CHEN Shuying; QIN Deming; WANG Jin
(Academy of Forestry in Ili，I′ning Xinjiang 835000)
Keywords:
‘Shushanggan Apricot’; fruit quality; nutritional ingredient; membership function method
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20200538
Abstract:
Taking the three varieties of ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.1’, ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.2’ and ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.3’ as the test materials.The methods of quality determination were used to evaluate its appearance quality and internal quality.It provided a reference for the promotion of fine varieties of ‘Shushanggan Apricot’ on trees and the selection of main varieties in production.The results showed ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.2’ fruit was bigger, ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.3’ fruit was smaller, the fruit shape was most correct in exterior quality.Single fruit quality, kernel quality and kernel quality were influenced by variety factors, cultivation management and so on.Generally speaking, large fruit varieties had large kernels.Comparison of comprehensive nutritional quality of pulp,the value of the average membership function was expressed in order ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.1’＞ ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.2’＞ ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.3’.Comparison of almond nutrients, the value of the average membership function was expressed in order ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.1’＞ ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.3’＞ ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.2’.Among the three varieties of ‘Shushanggan Apricot’,‘Shushanggan Apricot No.2’ had better appareance guality.The value of membership function of ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.1’ pulp and kernel was the highest in internal quality,the quality of comprehensive nutrition was the best.‘Shushanggan Apricot No.1’ and ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.2’ of ‘Shushanggan Apricot’ can be cultivated and popularized as the main varieties, ‘Shushanggan Apricot No.3’ can be planted as an inbred variety.

References:

[1]程祖强,洪智强.‘树上干’杏栽培技术[J].落叶果树,2013,45(1):40-41.[2]唐伟,李明,顾杰林.树上干杏丰产栽培技术[J].北方果树,2008(4):35.[3]丛桂芝,王瑾,尚振江,等.“树上干”杏育苗技术[J].中国园艺文摘,2014(5):184-185.[4]周书娟,王飞,田治国,等.新疆‘树上干’杏耐寒株系的鉴定与筛选[J].园艺学报,2011,38(10):1976-1982.[5]王瑾,卢磊,尚振江,等.‘树上干杏’抗寒性研究与评价[J].北方园艺,2016(21):16-19.[6]宋义前,王飞,张喜琴,等.新疆树上干杏不同株系花期抗寒性研究[J].新疆农垦科技,2012(11):15-16.[7]付超,周雪玲,朱春林.应用隶属函数法综合评价高酸苹果抗寒性及果实品质[J].北方园艺,2017(2):11-15.[8]尔吉辉.如何提高果品品质[J].农村实用科技,2000(4):11.[9]张君萍.新疆若干杏品种果实主要营养成分的测定与分析评价[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2006.[10]张加延.中国李杏资源及开发利用研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.[11]陈毅琼.杏不同品种果仁主要营养成分比较[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.[12]林金水.果蔬商品市场品质评价[J].福建农业,1997(4):13.[13]汤卫东,刘杰明,陈吉洪.苹果品质的模糊综合评价[J].食品与药品,2005(7):60-63.[14]席国琴,马向民.果品商品化处理对策[J].山西农业,2006(2):8.[15]王连春.引进番木瓜生长发育及果实品质评价[D].昆明:西南林学院,2004.[16]严程明,张江周,刘亚男,等.5个品种菠萝果实品质比较与分析[J].广东农业科学,2012(1):42-44.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-04-08