|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Organic Composts on Tomato Yield and Quality and Soil Characteristics

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年22
Page:
42-47
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Organic Composts on Tomato Yield and Quality and Soil Characteristics
Author(s):
SA Rina; CHEN Lixin; WANG Juan; LIU Liyong; ZOU Chunjiao
(Horticultural Sub-Academy，Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Harbin，Heilongjiang 150069)
Keywords:
tomato; yield; quality; soil nutrition; soil enzyme activity
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20194406
Abstract:
‘Guanghui 101’ tomato variety was used as experimental material，dairy compost，horse compost and sheep compost was applied to the 6 years replant soil of tomato，respectively.The effect of different organic composts on tomato yield，quality，nutrition contents and activity of enzyme on 6 years replant soil was investigated.The results showed that dairy compost，horse compost and sheep compost which was applied into replant soil significantly increased the signal fruit weight and yield of tomato，improved quality index，such as vitamin C content，soluble sugar content and ratio of sugar-acid，enhanced soil sucrase activity and soil urease activity，compared to the full chemical fertilizer treatment and CK treatment.Among the dairy compost，horse compost and sheep compost，sheep compost was the best to increase soil nutrition，but dairy compost was the best treatment for tomato yield,quality and enzyme activity compared with horse and sheep compost.Conclusion，dairy compost，horse compost and sheep compost significantly improved tomato yield，quality and regulated soil characteristics，enzyme activity，dairy compost effect was the best of all.

References:

[1]王蕾，成英，陈迪娟.设施茄果类蔬菜连作障碍成因分析及防治措施[J].上海蔬菜，2016(4):37-39.[2]郑军辉,叶素芬,喻景权．蔬菜作物连作障碍产生原因及生物防治[J].中国蔬菜,2004,1(3):56-58．[3]富宏丹.设施番茄连作土壤生态劣变成因解析[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2017.[4]蔡燕飞，廖宗文，章家恩，等.生态有机肥对番茄青枯病及土壤微生物多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报，2003,14(3)：349-353.[5]STAMATIADIS S，WERNER M，BUCHANAN M.Field assessment of soil quality as affected by compost and fertilizer application in a broccoli field (San Benito County，California)[J].Applied Soil Ecology A，1999，12(3):217-225.[6]李吉进,郝晋珉,邹国元，等.畜禽粪便高温堆肥及工厂化生产研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报，2004(3):50-53.[7]李继蕊，史庆华，王秀峰,等.不同配比蚯蚓堆肥和牛粪堆肥对根际微环境及黄瓜产量、品质的影响[J].山东农业科学，2013(6):66-70.[8]张国栋，展星，李园园，等.有机物料发酵流体和堆肥对苹果连作土壤环境及平邑甜茶幼苗生物量的影响[J].生态学报，2015(11):178-188.[9]李军.钼蓝比色法测定还原型维生素C[J].食品科学，2000，21(8):42-45.[10]丁雪梅，张晓君，赵云，等.蒽酮比色法测定可溶性糖含量的试验方法改进[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医，2016(12):230-233.[11]GB 12293—1990，水果、蔬菜制品可滴定酸含量的测定[S].北京：中华人民共和国农业农村部，1990.[12]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(第三版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.[13]姚槐应,黄昌勇.土壤微生物生态学及其实验技术[M].北京：科学出版社,2007.[14]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京：农业出版社,1986．[15]WANG P，CHANGA C M，WATSON M E，et al.Maturity indices for composted dairy and pig manures[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry，2004，36(5):767-776.[16]蒲德伦,朱海生.家畜环境卫生学及牧场设计案例版[M].重庆:西南师范大学出版社,2015.[17]仝少伟，时连辉，刘登民，等.不同有机堆肥对土壤性状及微生物生物量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，2014，20(1):110-117.[18]张国栋，展星，李园园，等.有机物料发酵流体和堆肥对苹果连作土壤环境及平邑甜茶幼苗生物量的影响[J].生态学报，2015(11):178-188.[19]张福锁.中国养分资源综合管理策略和技术[C].北京:中国农学会学术年会,2006.[20]邱莉萍，刘军，王益权，等.土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报，2004，10(3):277-280.[21]李恕艳,李吉进,张邦喜,等.施用有机肥对番茄品质风味的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料，2017(2):114-119,135.[22]黄雪琳，杨静，贺宇纯.土壤酶活性的主要影响因素分析[J].现代园艺，2018(11):94-95.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-02-02