|Table of Contents|

Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Value in Aksu City Based on Land Use Change

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年18
Page:
95-105
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Value in Aksu City Based on Land Use Change
Author(s):
ZHAO Peipei1; 2; GUO Xiaolong1; 2; GU Yunzhi1; 2; ZHANG Zhenzhen1; 2; JIANG Jing1; 2; CAO Yuee1; 2
(1.College of Resources and Environment Sciences，Xinjiang University，Urumqi，Xinjiang 830046;2.Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology，Urumqi ，Xinjiang 830046)
Keywords:
land use change; ecosystem service values; equivalent factor method; Aksu city
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20194299
Abstract:
A clear recognition of the dynamic changes in ecosystem service value (ESV) caused by land use change can provide a scientific basis for further optimizing regional land use structure and achieving regional sustainable development.Taking Aksu city as the research area,land use data were obtained by interpreting Landsat TM/OLI images,land use change characteristics in Aksu city were analyzed by Quote Lorenz Curve-Gini Coefficient and Land use transfer matrix from 2000 to 2016,ecosystem service value (ESV) of different land types was evaluated by Equivalent factor method,and the Impact of Land Use Change on ESV was analyzed by Sensitivity index and Service Value Flow Model.The results show that from 2000 to 2016,the Gini coefficients of land use classes did not exceed the ‘warning line (0.4)’ of the distribution gap,and the spatial distribution pattern of land was relatively balanced.In terms of land use structure change,forestland and grassland were positively changing,and unutilized land was negatively changing.The total ESV of Aksu city showed an increasing trend,and the contribution rate of ESV in various regions showed a feature that grassland (27.98%) was the largest value and cultivated land (3.40%) was the smallest value.The spatial differentiation of mean ESV was obvious,the high-value of mean ESV area has always been the area is Aksu municipality,and the Seed cultivation farm and Experimental woods field have always been low-value areas.The change of ESV coefficients of unutilized land and forestland value has a shrinking effect on ESV of Aksu city,while others have a magnifying effect.The value added of ESV mainly depends on the conversion of waters to grassland,and the losses mainly come from unutilized land and grassland.The dynamic results of ESV show that the land use structure of Aksu city is gradually rationalized.In the future,it is necessary to further protect the existing cultivated land and grassland,increase the forest land and water area,so as to promote the process of regional ecological civilization construction.

References:

[1]傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446.[2]MOONEY H A,DURAIAPPAH A,LARIQAUDERIE A.Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2013,110(Supplement_1):3665-3672.[3]魏慧,赵文武,张骁,等.基于土地利用变化的区域生态系统服务价值评价：以山东省德州市为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(11):3830-3839.[4]王燕,高吉喜,王金生,等.生态系统服务价值评估方法述评[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2013,23(11):337-339.[5]宋永永,薛东前,代兰海,等.晋陕蒙典型化石能源开发区土地利用变化及其生态响应[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(5):1199-1207.[6]COSTANZA R,D ARGE R,D E GROOT R,et al.The value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].World Environment,1997,387(6630):253-260.[7]GOWAN C,STEPHENSON K,SHABMAN L.The role of ecosystem valuation in environmental decision making:Hydropower relicensing and dam removal on the Elwha River[J].Ecological Economics,2006,56(4):508-523.[8]BARBIER E B,KOCH E W,SILLIMAN B R,et al.Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values[J].Science,2008,319(5861):321-323.[9]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.[10]谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.[11]张正勇,何新林,刘琳,等.中国天山冰川生态服务功能及价值评估[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):856-867.[12]MENDOZA-GONZLEZ G,MARTNEZ M L,LITHGOW D,et al.Land use change and its effects on the value of ecosystem services along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico[J].Ecological Economics,2012,82:23-32.[13]戴文远,江方奇,黄万里,等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究：以福州新区为例[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(12):2098-2109.[14]唐启琳,刘方,刘秀明,等.基于LUCC的喀斯特山区生态系统服务价值评价[J].环境科学与技术,2019,42(1):170-177.[15]陈忠升,陈亚宁,李卫红,等.新疆和田河流域土地利用及其生态服务价值变化[J].干旱区研究,2009,26(6):832-839.[16]张浩,赵智杰,谢金开,等.近20年来乌鲁木齐河下游地区生态系统服务价值的动态变化[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(2):341-348.[17]李飞.恢复生态学视角下的土地利用优化研究:以吉林西部为例[D].长春:吉林大学,2016.[18]汪雪格,汤洁,李昭阳,等.基于洛伦茨曲线的吉林西部土地利用结构变化分析[J].农业现代化研究,2007,28(3):310-313.[19]SHI Y,WANG R S,HUANG J L,et al.An analysis of the spatial and temporal changes in Chinese terrestrial ecosystem service function[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2012,57(17):2120-2131.[20]谢高地,肖玉,甄霖,等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3):10-13.[21]罗维,易海杰,李红举,等.洋河流域土地利用时空变异及其对生态服务功能价值的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(16):5342-5351.[22]刘亚茹,王聪,严力蛟.华北平原农区土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响：以河南省商丘市为例[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(5):1597-1606.[23]IZQUIERDO A E,GRAU H R.Agriculture adjustment,land-use transition and protected areas in Northwestern Argentina[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90(2):858-865.[24]宋佳楠,梅建屏,金晓斌,等.基于协调系数修正的区域生态系统服务价值测算研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2010,26(1):86-89.[25]石晓丽,王卫.生态系统功能价值综合评估方法与应用:以河北省康保县为例[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3998-4006.[26]唐秀美,陈百明,路庆斌,等.生态系统服务价值的生态区位修正方法:以北京市为例[J].生态学报,2010,30(13):3526-3535.[27]李晓赛,朱永明,赵丽,等.基于价值系数动态调整的青龙县生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(3):373-381.[28]李保杰,渠爱雪,顾和和,等.徐州市贾汪矿区土地利用变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态科学,2015,34(5):147-153.[29]周文霞,石培基,王永男,等.河谷型城市生态系统服务价值效应:以兰州为例[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(1):232-241.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-12-23