|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Nitrogen Forms on the Growth and Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Structure of Chimonanthus campanulatus

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年19
Page:
86-96
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Nitrogen Forms on the Growth and Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Structure of Chimonanthus campanulatus
Author(s):
LI MinghuLUO YuyingJIA WeijiaLI YueZHU YutingWANG Shu
(College of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture Sciences,Southwest Forestry University/Southwest Landscape Architecture Engineering Research Center of State Forestry Administration,Kunming,Yunnan 650224)
Keywords:
nitrogen fertilizerChimonanthus campanulatusbacteria abundancecommunity structures
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20194186
Abstract:
Chimonanthus campanulatus pot seedling was used as material,different forms (CK,N1(NH4NO3),N2(KNO3),N3(C2H5NO2) and N4(NH4Cl)) of nitrogen fertilizer were applied to planting soil,the influence of different nitrogen fertilizers on the bacterial community in the rhizosphere soil of Chimonanthus campanulatus were studied by real-time PCR and DGGE.In order to provide reference for the promotion and cultivation of Chimonanthus campanulatus,scientific fertilization and protection of soil ecosystems,the relationship between physical and chemical properties,soil bacterial community and plant growth were analyzed.The results showed that Chimonanthus campanulatus seedling height and dry weight of the nitrogen treatments were both higher than CK,and the highest was N1.The results of qPCR showed that the rhizosphere bacteria abundance of N1 was the highest compared with CK.DGGE analysis showed that the bacterial diversity index of nitrogen treatments was higher than CK.Correlation analysis showed that the bacteria abundance and diversity index were significantly correlated with the growth of Chimonanthus campanulatus (P<0.01).After comprehensive analysis,the nitrogen fertilizer treatment had significant effects on plant growth and development,soil microbial quantity and community structure.NH4NO3 was the best for the growth and development of Chimonanthus campanulatus and the amount and diversity index of rhizosphere soil bacteria.

References:

[1]邢瑶,马兴华.氮素形态对植物生长影响的研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报,2015,17(2):109-117.[2]林宁,梁莹,杨振德,等.不同氮素形态对桉树幼苗生长及某些生理特性的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(4):1423-1425.[3]司江英,汪晓丽,陈冬梅,等.不同pH和氮素形态对作物幼苗生长的影响[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2007(3):68-71.[4]邢素芝,汪建飞,李孝良,等.氮肥形态及配比对菠菜生长和安全品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(2):527-534.[5]李霞,阎秀峰,刘剑锋.氮素形态对黄檗幼苗生长及氮代谢相关酶类的影响[J].植物学通报,2006(3):255-261.[6]王小丽,杨丹妮,黄丹枫.氮素形态对小白菜生长和碳氮积累的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(4):1042-1048.[7]孔凡婧.氮素形态对红松幼苗生长及氮同化酶活性的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2010.[8]张雪,刘守伟,吴凤芝,等.不同氮素形态对黄瓜根区土壤微生物数量及土壤酶活性的影响[J].中国蔬菜,2014(3):19-25.[9]许楠,张会慧,朱文旭,等.氮素形态对饲料桑树幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J].草业科学,2012,29(10):1574-1580.[10]康晓育,孙协平,常聪,等.氮素形态对不同苹果砧木幼苗生长的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41(6):133-138.[11]弭宝彬,田雪亮,王殿东,等.转MAPK双链RNA干扰表达载体黄瓜对根际土壤真菌群落多样性的影响[J].中国生物防治学报,2013,29(3):395-400.[12]戴雅婷,闫志坚,解继红,等.基于高通量测序的两种植被恢复类型根际土壤细菌多样性研究[J].土壤学报,2017,54(3):735-748.[13]杜雷,王素萍,张利红,等.氮素形态对红菜薹根际和非根际土壤微生物数量及产量的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2016,55(12):3021-3025.[14]马宗斌,熊淑萍,何建国,等.氮素形态对专用小麦中后期根际土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2008(4):1544-1551.[15]严君,韩晓增,王树起,等.不同形态氮素对种植大豆土壤中微生物数量及酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(2):341-347.[16]王澍,芮蕊,樊国盛,等.不同氮肥对番茄根际土壤真菌多样性的影响[J].西部林业科学,2012,41(3):48-52.[17]陈龙清,陈俊愉.蜡梅属植物的形态、分布、分类及其应用[J].中国园林,1999(1):74-75.[18]乔云发,苗淑杰,韩晓增.氮素形态对大豆根系形态性状及释放H+的影响[J].大豆科学,2006(3):265-269.[19]艾绍英,孙自航,姚建武,等.氮肥种类及用量对赤红壤pH和可溶性盐的影响[J].生态环境,2008(4):1614-1618.[20]唐颖,安利佳.施肥对蓝莓钵苗土壤性质及生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2015(14):178-181.[21]朱祝军,蒋有条.不同形态氮素对不结球白菜生长和硝酸盐积累的影响(简报)[J].植物生理学通讯,1994(3):198-201.[22]蒋立平.氮素形态对柑桔根系生长的影响[J].中国柑桔,1990(3):14-16.[23]廖红.高级植物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.[24]孙敏红,卢晓鹏,李静,等.不同氮素形态对枳橙幼苗生长特性的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2016,55(8):2014-2018.[25]KATO T.Nitrogen metabolism and utilization in citrus[J].Horticultural Reviews,1986(8):181-216.[26]WANG S,DONG L Q,LUO Y Y,et al.Characterization of rhizosphere microbial communities in continuous cropping maca (Lepidium meyenii) red soil,Yunnan,China[J].Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science,2020,6(6):805-818.[27]魏天娇,魏志军,陈鹏,等.氮肥形态对香蕉种植土壤中氨氧化细菌与古菌的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(4):690-697.[28]CHRISTOPHER D C.Impact of cattle grazing and inorganic fertilizer additions to managed grasslands on the microbial community composition of soils[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2005,31(1):73-82.[29]唐杰,徐青锐,王立明,等.若尔盖高原湿地不同退化阶段的土壤细菌群落多样性[J].微生物学通报,2011,38(5):677-686.[30]袁红朝,秦红灵,刘守龙,等.长期施肥对红壤性水稻土细菌群落结构和数量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(22):4610-4617.[31]SHEN J P,ZHANG L M,GUO J F,et al.Impact of long-term fertilization practices on the abundance and composition of soil bacterial communities in Northeast China[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2010,46(1):119-121.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-12-24