|Table of Contents|

Physiological Response of Root System of 27 Grape Germplasms to Aluminum Stress and Screening of Aluminum Tolerant Genetypes

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年13
Page:
15-24
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Physiological Response of Root System of 27 Grape Germplasms to Aluminum Stress and Screening of Aluminum Tolerant Genetypes
Author(s):
ZHANG Yongfu; XU Shiqin; YANG Yanbin; LUAN Wenjie; MO Liling; HAN Li
(School of Agriculture and Life Sciences，Kunming University，Kunming，Yunnan 650214)
Keywords:
grape; aluminium stress; physiological response; screening; membership function
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20194139
Abstract:
Using 27 grape germplasms with one year old as test material，soilless cultivation method was used，the effects of aluminum stress on root activity，malondialdehyde (MDA) content and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity were studied.In order to find out the difference of physiological indexes of 27 grape germplasms under aluminum stress，the genotypes with strong aluminum tolerance were selected.The results showed that under the stress of aluminum，the root activity and SOD activity of the tested grape germplasm were generally decreased，while the contents of MDA，H2O2，proline，protein，soluble sugar，starch and Al were generally increased.But there were great differences among different germplasms.There was a 63.12% difference between ‘Zuoyouhong’ with the largest decrease in root activity and ‘Hongbilete’ with the smallest；there was a 48.42% difference between ‘Chaojiwuhe’ with the largest decrease in SOD and Vitis sinocinerea with slightly ascending.There was a 67.05% difference between ‘Tonghua-3’ with the largest increase in MDA and ‘Bainiunai’ with slightly declining；there was a 91.47% difference between ‘Meiguimi’ with the largest increase in H2O2 and ‘Red Globe’ with slightly declining；there was a 4.75 times difference between ‘Tonghua-3’ with the largest increase in proline and ‘Hongbilete’ with slightly declining；there was a 11.73 times difference between ‘Blackcurrant’ with the largest increase in protein and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ with the smallest；there was a 2.36 times difference between V.quinquangularis with the largest increase in soluble sugar and ‘Heiti’ with the smallest；there was a 1.10 times difference between ‘Blackcurrant’ with the largest increase in starch and ‘Beichun’ with a slight decrease.There was a 21.02 times difference between V.quinquangularis the largest accumulation in Al and ‘Heimeigui’ with the smallest accumulation.Through the comprehensive analysis of aluminum resistance coefficient of 27 grape germplasms by membership function method，it was concluded that the germplasm with strong aluminum resistance were V.sinocinerea from south China，and ‘Blackcurrant’‘Red Globe’‘Heiti’ from Eurasian grape population，the germplasm with weak aluminum resistance were ‘Gaoshan-2’‘Tonghua-3’，V.quinquangularis and ‘SO4’ from American interspecific hybrid.In general，among the 27 grape germplasms，the aluminum tolerance of Eurasian population was generally stronger than that of American population and east Asian population except V.sinocinerea，and the hybrids of other interpopulation hybrids were in the middle.

References:

[1]杨开娜,骆夜烽,谢家琪,等.酸铝胁迫对苜蓿种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(8):103-109.[2]胡蕾,应小芳,刘鹏,等.铝胁迫对大豆生理特性的影响[J].土壤肥料,2004(2):9-11.[3]YANG Z B,HORST W J.Aluminum-induced inhibition of root growth：Roles of cell wall assembly，structure，and function[J].Springer International Publishing,2015,24:253-274.[4]CHEN J,WANG W H,WU F H,et al.Hydrogen sulfide alleviates aluminum toxicity in barley seedlings[J].Plant Soil,2013,362(1-2):301-318.[5]张永福,任禛,陈泽斌,等.水杨酸对缓解葡萄苗铝毒害的生理机制[J].华北农学报,2015,30(1):182-187.[6]舒畅.耐铝毒水稻(Oryza sativa L.)种质资源的筛选及不同形态N素对水稻幼苗耐铝性的影响[D].南京:南京农业大学,2011.[7]刘武.玉米抗铝毒自交系的筛选、生理检测和基因芯片分析[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2013.[8]齐波,赵团结,盖钧镒.中国大豆种质资源耐铝毒性的变异特点及优选[J].大豆科学,2007,26(2):813-819.[9]熊洁,邹小云,陈伦林,等.油菜苗期耐铝基因型筛选和鉴定指标的研究[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(5):3112-3120.[10]崔翠,程闯,赵愉风,等.52份豌豆种质萌发期耐铝毒性的综合评价与筛选[J].作物学报,2019,45(5):798-805.[11]孔庆山.中国葡萄志[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2004.[12]盛业龙,王莎莎,许美玲,等.应用隶属函数法综合评价不同烤烟品种苗期抗旱性[J].南方农业学报,2014,45(10):1751-1758.[13]黎裕,李舒凡.作物耐酸铝性鉴定概况与设想[J].中国种业,1994(2):27-28.[14]KORIR P C.大豆耐铝毒的鉴定、遗传和QTL分析[D].南京:南京农业大学,2010.[15]OUMA E,LIGEYO D,MATONYEI T,et al.Enhancing maize grain yield in acid soils of western kenya using aluminum tolerance germplasm[J].J Agric Sci Technol,2013（3):33-46.[16]GOH C H,LEE Y.Aluminum toxicity uptake and aluminum toxicity induced rapid root growth inhibition of rice seedlings[J].Plant Biol,1999,42:151-158.[17]BLAMEY F P C,NISHIZAWA N K,YOSHIMURA E.Timing,magnitude and location of initial soluble aluminum injuries to mungbean roots[J].J Soil Sci Plant Nutr,2004,50:67-76.[18]GUO T R,ZHANG G P,ZHOU M X,et al.Effects of aluminum toxicity and cadmium toxicity on growth and antioxidant enzyme activities of two barley genotypes with different Al resistance[J].Plant Soil,2004,258:241-248.[19]孙文君,唐敏,任健,等.8份云南苜蓿属优异种质资源对铝胁迫的生理耐受响应研究[J].草地学报,2018,26(5):1190-1197.[20]刘影.扁穗牛鞭草和多花黑麦草对铝胁迫的生理响应[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2011.[21]吴亚,陈思,张卫红,等.多花黑麦草对铝胁迫的生长生理响应[J].植物科学学报,2018,36(5):755-760.[22]TAYLOR G J,BASU A,BASU U,et al.Al-induced 5-kDa,membrane-bound proteins are associated with resistance to Al in a segregating population of wheat[J].Plant Physiol,1997,114:363-372.[23]赵会娥,贺立源,章爱群,等.铝胁迫对植物光合作用的影响及其机理的研究进展[J].华中农业大学学报,2008,27(1):155-160.[24]李刚,徐芳杰,张奇春,等.铝胁迫对不同耐铝性小麦基因型根尖抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）,2009,35(6):619-625.[25]王月平,章艺,吴玉环,等.植物铝毒害及抗铝毒机制[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(9):3900-3903.[26]孙建,乐美旺,饶月亮,等.芽期Al3+胁迫对芝麻幼苗生长的影响及种质资源耐铝毒性评价[J].中国油料作物学报,2014,36(5):602-609.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-09-02