|Table of Contents|

Preparation of Antagonistic Yeast Dry Powder and Its Preservation Effect on Winter Jujube

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年13
Page:
98-104
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Preparation of Antagonistic Yeast Dry Powder and Its Preservation Effect on Winter Jujube
Author(s):
GUO DongqiWANG YilinWANG JieruWANG XiaoyuCHEN Qian
(College of Life Science,Tarim University/Xinjiang Production & Construction Group Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing in Xinjiang,Alar,Xinjiang 843300)
Keywords:
antagonistic yeastvacuum dryingvacuum freeze-dryingpreparationpreservation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20193919
Abstract:
Antagonistic Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used as material,and the antagonistic yeast dry powder was prepared by vacuum drying and vacuum freeze-drying.The activity and biocontrol efficacy of the dry powder were studied,in order to select the best antagonistic yeast dry powder for preservation of postharvest winter jujube.The results showed that there was no obvious difference between vacuum freeze-drying and vacuum drying,the drying powder prepared by vacuum drying with 2.5% trehalose and 2.5% sucrose as protective agent had the best effect.The survival rate of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was 64%,the viable count of yeast dry powder was 7.2×105 cfu?g-1 when stored at 4 ℃ for one month.As a result of the artificial wound,the dry powder of Saccharomyces cerevisiae had inhibitory effect on penicillium citrinum,after storage of 5 days at 24 ℃,lesion diameter of wound expanded from 3 mm to 5.3 mm,and decay rate of wound was 15%.The results of the fresh-keeping test showed that yeast dry powder treatment could reduce the natural decay rate of winter jujube,and played a positive role in hardness,weight loss,soluble solids and vitamin C on winter jujube.

References:

[1]HANG Q R,ZHAO L N,LI Z B,et al.Screening and identification of an antagonistic yeast controlling postharvest blue mold decay of pears and the possible mechanisms involved[J].Biological Control,2019,133,26-33.[2]李颖,郭东起.非传统保鲜方法控制冬枣采后病害研究进展[J].北方园艺,2018(23):164-169.[3]李侨飞,张红印,杨其亚,等.防治水果病害的生防酵母及生防制剂研究进展[J].食品科学,2018,39(1):291-296.[4]CALVO-GARRIDO C,TEIXID N,ROUDET J,et al.Biological control of Botrytis bunch rot in Atlantic climate vineyards with Candida sake CPA-1 and its survival under limiting conditions of temperature and humidity[J].Biological Control,2014,79:24-35.[5]PRODORUTTI D,FERRARI A,PELLEGRINI A,et al.Efficacy of Metschnikowia fructicola (Shemer) against post-harvest soft fruit (berries) rots in northern Italy (Trentino)[J].IOBC/WPRS Bulletin,2008,39:107-113.[6]LAHLALI R,RAFFAELE B,JIJAKLI M H.UV protectants for Candida oleophila (strain O),a biocontrol agent of postharvest fruit diseases[J].Plant Pathology,2011,60(2):288-295.[7]STEFAN K.Development of ‘Blossom-Protect’:A yeast preparation for the reduction of blossom infections by fire blight[J].Electronics & Communications in Japan,2002,87(12):38-50.[8]ABADIAS M,TEIXIDO N,USALL J,et al.Viability,efficacy and storage stability of freeze-dried biocontrol agent Candida sake using different protective and rehydration media[J].Journal of Food Protection,2001,64:856-861.[9]JANISIEWICZ W J,KORSTEN L.Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits[J].Phytopathology.2002,40(40):411-441.[10]李博强.海藻糖提高酵母拮抗菌生活力和生防效力的作用机制[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(植物研究所),2006.[11]许春青.芒果炭疽病菌拮抗酵母的筛选、鉴定及其保护剂的评价[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2013.[12]温新宇.拮抗酵母菌的筛选、鉴定及其制剂对枇杷贮藏保鲜的影响[D].镇江:江苏大学,2016.[13]郭东起,赵萍,侯旭杰.冬枣采后病害生物防治用拮抗酵母菌的筛选[J].保鲜与加工,2011,11(6):6-9.[14]PETTER M,SEBASTIAN H,JOHAN S.Optimization of liquid and dry formulations of the biocontrol yeast Pichia anomala J121[J].Appl Microbiol Biotechnol,2007,73(5):1008-1016.[15]PETTER M,JOHAN S,SEBASTIAN H.Formulation and stabilisation of the biocontrol yeast Pichia anomala[J].Antonie van Leeuwenhoek,2011,99(1):107-112.[16]LI B Q,TIAN S P.Combined effects of endo-and exogenous trehalose on stress tolerance and biocontrol efficacy of two antagonistic yeasts[J].Biological Control,2008,46(2):187-193.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-09-09