|Table of Contents|

Sensitivity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum From Vegetable to Six Fungicides in Tianjin

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年09
Page:
66-72
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Sensitivity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum From Vegetable to Six Fungicides in Tianjin
Author(s):
YANG Lijuan; GAO Wei; ZHANG Chunxiang; WANG Yong
(Tianjin Institute of Plant Protection,Tianjin 300381)
Keywords:
Tianjin; Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; fungicides; sensitivity
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20193035
Abstract:
Taking Sclerotinia sclerotiorum strains from vegetable in Tianjin as experimental materials,the sensitivity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum to 6 fungicides were determined according to the rates of the mycelia growth of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in media containing the fungicides,to provide theoretical guidance for controlling Sclerotinia sclerotiorum from vegetable in Tianjin.The results showed EC50 values of the 10 strains for fluazinam,prochloraz,procymidone,boscalid,iprodione and carbendazim rangedin 0.003 0-0.035 3,0.001 7-0.107 3,0.015 4-0.192 9,0.016 1-2.055 4,0.004 2-0.178 9,0.009 8-0.131 9 μg·mL-1,respectively.The sensitivity of strain XK1 to fluazinamand XK2 to procymidone were both the lowest,the strain DQZ1 were both the most sensitive to these two fungicides;the sensitivity of strain XK2 to boscalid and strain DQZ2 to iprodione were both the lowest,the strain XK1 were both the most sensitive to these two fungicides;the sensitivity of strain WZ2 to prochloraz and strain XK3 to carbendazim were both the lowest,and the most sensitive strains to prochloraz and carbendazim were strain YLQ and WZ1,respectively.These results indicated the sensitivity of 10 strains to 6 fungicides differed among strains,and that significantly difference of sensitivity of some strains were found among different areas.

References:

[1]SAHARAN G S,MEHTA N.Sclerotinia diseases of crop plants:Biology,ecology and disease management[M].London:Springer,2008:484.[2]郑建秋,师迎春,胡铁军.蔬菜菌核病的识别与防治[J].中国蔬菜,2005,1(2):53-53.[3]崔文清,金红云,牛木森,等.保护地蔬菜菌核病的发生调查与防治[J].中国植保导刊,2009,29(2):24-26.[4]LIANG H J,DI Y L,LI J L,et al.Baseline sensitivity and control efficacy of fluazinam against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum[J].European Journal of Plant Pathology,2015,142(4):691-699.[5]WANG Y,DUAN Y B,ZHOU M G.Baseline sensitivity and efficacy of fluazinam in controlling Sclerotinia stem rot of rapeseed[J].European Journal of Plant Pathology,2016,144(2):337-343.[6]MAO X W,LI J S,CHEN Y L,et al.Resistance risk assessment for fluazinam in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum[J].Pesticide Biochemisty and Physiology,2017,144:27-35.[7]张冉.咪鲜胺对核盘菌生长和致病影响的研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2018.[8]曹敏娟.油菜菌核病菌对腐霉利的抗性及其机制[D].扬州:扬州大学,2008.[9]陈方新,齐永霞,高智谋.油菜菌核病菌对速克灵的抗药性风险研究[J].激光生物学报,2012,21(2):145-149.[10]潘以楼,朱桂梅,郭建,等.油菜菌核病菌对啶酰菌胺的敏感性及对不同杀菌剂敏感性的相关分析[J].西南农业学报,2012,25(2):507-512.[11]HU S,ZHANG J,ZHANG Y,et al.Baseline sensitivity and toxic actions of boscalid against,Sclerotinia sclerotiorum[J].Crop Protection,2018,110:83-90.[12]LIU X,YIN Y,YAN L,et al.Sensitivity to iprodione and boscalid of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolates collected from rapeseed in China[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2009,95(2):106-112.[13]乔昕,余洋,陈杰,等.川渝地区油菜菌核病菌对多菌灵的抗性检测及抗性机理研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(5):26-30.[14]WANG Y,HOU Y P,CHEN C J,et al.Detection of resistance in Sclerotinia sclerotiorumto carbendazim and dimethachlon in Jiangsu Province of China[J].Australasian Plant Pathology,2014,43(3):307-312.[15]徐文杰.油菜菌核病菌对多菌灵的抗药性研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2011.[16]乔广行,李兴红,周莹,等.北京地区不同寄主蔬菜菌核病菌抗药性比较[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(12):155-157．[17]谭清,高熹,吴毅歆,等.氟啶胺灌药浓度和时间对大白菜根肿病防效的影响[J].农业灾害研究,2014,4(8):1-2.[18]邢益范,陈坚.22%多抗·咪鲜胺微乳剂对黄瓜白粉病的室内毒力及田间药效评价[J].现代农药,2012,11(5):54-56.[19]石凤梅.80%腐霉利可湿性粉剂对番茄灰霉病的防效研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014(7):68-69.[20]唐明,晋知文,谢学文,等.啶酰菌胺对黄瓜灰霉病防治效果的综合评价[J].中国蔬菜,2016(2):51-55.[21]黄海,张鑫,邹杭,等.番茄灰霉病菌室内毒力测定及药效试验[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(2):184-190.[22]于海龙,古瑜,韩启厚,等.多菌灵对豇豆枯萎病病原菌抑菌效果及包衣后对种子生活力的影响[J].北方园艺,2013(12):113-115.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-07-23