|Table of Contents|

Effect of Two Suillus Ectomycorrhizal Fungus on Seedling Growth of Picea mongolica

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年04
Page:
87-92
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Two Suillus Ectomycorrhizal Fungus on Seedling Growth of Picea mongolica
Author(s):
BAO Qiuli1QIAO Yu2YAN Wei2CHAO Kairui2WEI Jie2
(1.Vocational and Technical College,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Baotou,Inner Mongolia 014109;2.Forestry College,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010010)
Keywords:
Picea mongolicaectomycorrhizaeSuillusmycorrhizal seedling
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20192033
Abstract:
Picea mongolica,as an endemic tree of China,was taken as test material,to determine the effect of inoculation of two ectomycorrhizal fungus of Suillus on Picea mongolica seedlings by mean of artificial inoculation of Suillus brevipes and Suillus luteus with Picea mongolica seedlings in the pot.The results showed that after inoculation with S.brevipes,compared with the control,the total fresh weight,aboveground and underground fresh weight of mycorrhizal seedlings were respectively increased by 25.16%,7.07%,and 63.80%.The total dry weight,aboveground and underground dry weight of mycorrhizal seedlings were respectively increased by 28.91%,15.86% and 57.58%.The main root and lateral root lengths of mycorrhizal seedlings were respectively increased by 150.00% and 16.20 cm.The height of mycorrhizal seedlings were not higher than those of the control,and the ground diameter was increased by 7.74%.After inoculation with S.luteus,compared with the control,the total fresh weight,aboveground and underground fresh weight of mycorrhizal seedlings were respectively increased by 49.52%,34.24% and 79.64%.The total dry weight,aboveground and underground dry weight of mycorrhizal seedlings were respectively increased by 38.39%,19.31% and 77.27%.The main root and lateral root lengths of mycorrhizal seedlings were respectively increased by 107.14% and 19.10 cm,The height of mycorrhizal seedlings were also not higher than those of the control,and the ground diameter was increased by 23.26%.The results could provide theoretical and technical references for mycorrhizal technique applying to Picea mongolica in the near future.

References:

[1]刘有军,刘世增,康才周,等.中国特有植物沙地云杉的濒危机制[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):60-65,73.[2]高润宏,丛林,周效明.中国沙地云杉[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2016.[3]李银科,刘世增,康才周,等.温度对樟子松和沙地云杉种子萌发特征的影响[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(4):73-77.[4]薛振恒.沙地云杉自述[J].内蒙古林业,2003(12):48.[5]徐文铎.内蒙古沙地白扦林的植物组成和生态环境调查[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1987,18(4):19-24.[6]郑元润,张新时,徐文铎.沙地云杉种群调节的研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21(4):312-318.[7]ZHOU C J,HAN S J,XU W D,et al.Modular dynamics and structure of Picea mongolica[J].Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research,2001,19(5):369-376.[8]徐文铎,刘广田.内蒙古白音敖包自然保护区沙地云杉林生态系统研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1998.[9]黄三祥.沙地云杉生态学特性及引种研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2004.[10]爱华,姜海燕.沙地云杉内生真菌拮抗菌株的筛选及鉴定[J/OL].分子植物育种:1-7[2019-12-02].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20190417.1347.023.html.[11]任燕,姜海燕,爱华.红果型沙地云杉内生真菌多样性[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(6):180-187.[12]任燕.沙地云杉内生真菌形态学和分子学分类鉴定[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018.[13]伊如汉.基于基因组荧光原位杂交的沙地云杉及近缘种亲缘关系[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2017.[14]郑舒文,白玉娥,何炎红,等.沙地云杉及其近缘种遗传多样性研究[J].福建林业科技,2015,42(3):24-28.[15]郑舒文.几种云杉遗传多样性及其对环境适应性研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2015.[16]宋大北,王艳军,陈国发,等.沙地云杉球果害虫在树冠上的发生规律研究[J].内蒙古林业科技,2015,41(4):32-34,50.[17]周措尤.半干旱地区沙地云杉播种育苗试验[J].防护林科技,2018(2):31-32.[18]刘琴,杨炜,蒋明,等.沙地云杉容器苗强化育苗技术[J].林业实用技术,2014(3):41-43.[19]宝秋利.白音敖包沙地云杉外生菌根真菌调查及其共生菌土生空团菌纯培养条件的研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2005.[20]田慧敏.内蒙古赤峰市克什克腾旗大型真菌初步研究[J].赤峰学院学报(自然科学版),2014,30(6):7-9.[21]木兰.白音敖包国家级自然保护区大型真菌资源调查兼中国蜡蘑属的分类学研究[D].长春:吉林农业大学,2015.[22]尹彬.沙地云杉林真菌调查及其共生菌根形态类型研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012.[23]庞丽杰,王文革,宋福强.3株外生菌根真菌对红松苗木的接种效应[J].防护林科技,2015(11):41-43.[24]邹慧,王春胜,陆俊錕,等.6种外生菌根真菌对西南桦幼苗的接种效应[J].微生物学通报,2019,46(3):453-460.[25]王建康,薛煜,左振鑫,等.菌根菌接种对樟子松高生长影响的研究[J].中国森林病虫,2016,35(6):9-12.[26]吴冰,章小灵,崔宝凯,等.食(药)用真菌比较基因组分析揭示其生态特性[J].菌物学报,2015,34(4):742-760.[27]冯万艳,胡丹,冯婧玮,等.两种乳牛肝菌属菌根食用菌与马尾松的共生特征[J].菌物学报,2019,38(6):792-801.[28]韩长志,任雪敏.褐环乳牛肝菌的研究进展[J].北方园艺,2016(6):195-199.[29]袁明生,孙佩琼.中国大型真菌彩色图谱[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2013.[30]郭米山,高广磊,丁国栋,等.呼伦贝尔沙地樟子松外生菌根真菌多样性[J].菌物学报,2018,37(9):1133-1142.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-03-30