|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Organic Base Fertilizers on Tomato Growth and Soil Fertility in Greenhouse

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年19
Page:
67-74
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Organic Base Fertilizers on Tomato Growth and Soil Fertility in Greenhouse
Author(s):
LIU Jiqing1; LAN Zhiqian1; TIAN Xingwu2; ZHANG Kaige1; LIN Wei1; ZHANG Xueyan1
(1.School of Agriculture,Ningxia University，Yinchuan，Ningxia 750021；2.Management Committee of Wuzhong National Agricultural Sci-Tech Garden，Wuzhong，Ningxia 751200)
Keywords:
biochar; organic modifier; biogas residue; soil fertility
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20191375
Abstract:
The continuous cropping obstacle was an increasingly prominent problem for tomato production in the greenhouse in Ningxia，while it hampered the sustainable utilization of soil.The traditional chicken manure was applied as basal (control).Meanwhile，the base fertilizers treatments considered were biogas residue and biocontrol bacterium (T1)，biogas residue and biocontrol bacterium and organic modifier (T2)，biogas residue+biocontrol bacterium+organic modifier+biochar (T3)，biogas residue+organic modifier+biochar+calcium (T4)，respectively.The study aimed to explore the effects of different fertilizers on the soil quality in continuous tomato cropping in the greenhouse.The results showed that compared with CK，biocontrol bacterium and organic modifier increased the concentration of soil organic matter and available potassium.Biocontrol bacterium increased the root volume and root diameter and improved the root biomass by 28.68%.Compared to CK，both T3 and T4 increased the total nitrogen，organic matter，available nitrogen and available potassium content of soil by 24.56%，113.97%，18.92%，39.44% and 22.81%,100.77%，27.03%，13.96%，respectively.Moreover，T3 and T4 reduced soil pH.The root length，root surface area，root volume and root biomass were increased in T4 compared with CK.The comprehensive fertility indexes (CFI) of T3 and T4 were higher than other treatments，and the CFI was the lowest in CK and T1.Soil fertility had a significant positive correlation with total nitrogen，available nitrogen，available potassium and organic matter，and had a significant negative relationship with pH.In short，biogas residue，organic modifier and biochar improved increased soil organic matter content，increased soil fertility and promoted plant growth The bio-charcoal content of soil organic matter was significantly higher than that of biogas residue and organic improved.The principal component analysis showed that the comprehensive score was T4>T3>T2>CK>T1.

References:

[1]李俊良,李晓林.山东寿光保护地蔬菜施肥现状及问题的研究[J].土壤通报,2002,33(2):126-128.[2]金慧,吴景贵,李江楠,等.施用有机肥对作物生长性状影响的研究进展[J].现代农业科技,2010(12):261.[3]陈福兴,秦道珠,谢良商.长期施用有机肥对土壤养分平衡及增产作用：肥料效应监测试验结果[J].土壤肥料,1990(5)：13-16.[4]KAUTZ T,WIRTH S,ELLMER F.Microbial activity in a sandy arable soil is governed by the fertilization regime[J].European Journal of Soil Biology,2004,40(2):87-94.[5]徐阳春,沈其荣,冉伟.长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响[J].土壤学报,2002,39(1):89-96.[6]杨靖一.洛桑试验站150周年：经典试验的研究进展[J].土壤学进展,1995,23(1):9-12.[7]张祥明,孙义祥,王文军,等.有机肥部分替代化肥对水稻土壤供氮特征和氮素表观盈亏的影响[J].农学学报,2018,8(12):28-34.[8]侯时季,李涛,蔺阁,等.施用沼渣和接种丛枝菌根真菌对甘草生长及矿质营养的影响[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(12):4453-4460.[9]韩召强,陈效民,曲成闯,等.生物质炭对黄瓜连作土壤理化性状、酶活性及土壤质量的持续效应[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(5):1227-1236.[10]许帆,张亚萍,田兴武,等.复合型有机酸性土壤改良剂不同施用量对连作黄瓜土壤改良效果研究[J].北方园艺,2016(14):187-192.[11]钱晓雍,沈根祥,郭春霞,等.不同废弃物对设施菜地次生盐渍化土壤的修复效果[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(4):737-743.[12]刘馨,许帆,祁娟霞,等.柠条堆肥和改良剂对黄瓜连作土壤理化性质、酶活性和微生物数量的影响[J].河南农业科学,2017,46(7):49-56.[13]赵芸晨,秦嘉海,肖占文,等.糠醛渣、沼渣与化肥配施对制种玉米田理化性质和酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):102-105.[14]代立兰,张怀山,夏曾润,等.有机废弃物菌糠和醋糟对次生盐渍化土壤修复效果研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2014,32(1):218-222.[15]徐炜南.硼对番茄生长及果实风味品质的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.[16]BOLA〖AKN~〗OS L,LUKASZEWSKI K,BONILLA I,et al.Why boron？〖KG-*2〗[J].Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2004,42(11):907-912.[17]戴以周,韦青侠.几种生防菌剂对番茄的促生作用[J].安徽农业科学,2015(18):121-122.[18]马彦霞.日光温室番茄栽培基质的根际环境及化感作用研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2013.[19]包耀贤,徐明岗,吕粉桃,等.长期施肥下土壤肥力变化的评价方法[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(20):4197-4204.[20]陈轩敬,赵亚南,柴冠群,等.长期不同施肥下紫色土综合肥力演变及作物产量响应[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(S1):139-144.[21]全国土壤普查办公室.中国土壤[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998.[22]宋春雨,张兴义,刘晓冰,等.土壤有机质对土壤肥力与作物生产力的影响[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2008(3):357-362.[23]郭伟,陈红霞,张庆忠,等.华北高产农田施用生物质炭对耕层土壤总氮和碱解氮含量的影响[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(3):425-428.[24]陈红霞,杜章留,郭伟,等.施用生物炭对华北平原农田土壤容重、阳离子交换量和颗粒有机质含量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(11):2930-2934.[25]高德才,张蕾,刘强,等.旱地土壤施用生物炭减少土壤氮损失及提高氮素利用率[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(6):54-61.[26]张娜,梁一民.干旱气候对白羊草群落土壤水分和地上部生长的初步观察[J].生态学报,2000,2(4):964-970.[27]乔俊卿,夏彦飞,刘邮洲,等.Bacillus subtilis PTS-394对番茄根系及根围微生态的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2014(6):1304-1308.[28]勾芒芒,屈忠义.土壤中施用生物炭对番茄根系特征及产量的影响[J].生态环境学报,2013(8):1348-1352.[29]刘术均,刘爱群,惠成章.施用生物炭对土壤有机质及茄子根系特征和产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2018(1):72-76.[30]王璞.土壤中添加生物质炭对土壤及番茄生长指标影响的研究[D].晋中:山西农业大学,2015.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-10-09