|Table of Contents|

Preliminary Study on the Effects of Branch Angle and Branch Height on Disease and Sunburn of Precocious Walnut Fruit

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年21
Page:
20-24
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Preliminary Study on the Effects of Branch Angle and Branch Height on Disease and Sunburn of Precocious Walnut Fruit
Author(s):
MA Huabing123CHEN Liying123QI Guohui234QIANG Jingsha123
(1.Hebei Lyuling Fruit Co.Ltd.,Xingtai,Hebei 054300;2.Institute of Walnut Industry Technology of Hebei Province (Xingtai),Xingtai,Hebei 054300;3.Research Center for Walnut Engineering and Technology of Hebei,Xingtai,Hebei 054300;4.College of Forestry,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei 071000)
Keywords:
branch anglebranch heightfruit diseasessunburnnut quality
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20191011
Abstract:
In order to explore the agronomic measures to prevent and control the disease and sunburn occurrence of precocious walnut fruits,full fruit period walnut trees of ‘Lyuling’ were used as materials to study the disease and sunburn of fruits grown on branches at different angles and heights.The results showed that the total fruit number,good fruit number and good fruit rate decreased with the branch angle increased,and the diseased fruit rate increased,nevertheless,the sunburned fruit rate had no the significant difference,and the nut quality decreased.The good fruit rate,nut weight,nut diameter and kernel fat content of branch angle 30° were 30.71%,15.84 g,38.18 mm and 67.68%,respectively.Compared with the branch height below 1.2 m,the total fruit number and the good fruit number increased significantly than branch height above 1.2 m,the diseased fruit rate decreased significantly than branch height above 1.2 m,and the sunburned fruit rate increased significantly than branch height above 1.2 m,and the nut quality had no significant difference.Considering the branch bending angle and the branch growing height,among the branch height above 1.2 m,the branch bending angle 30° had absolute advantages in total fruit number,good fruit rate,diseased fruit rate,nut weight and kernel fat content,which were 13.50,42.00%,46.50%,16.48 g and 68.00% respectively,followed by the branch bending angle 60°,but the sunburned fruit rate of the two treatments were higher,which were 11.50% and 12.59%,respectively;among the branches below 1.2 m,the nut quality of the branch bending angle 30° was higher,and there had no significant difference in other indexes.Comprehensive analysis showed that in order to ensure high quality and high yield,the best angle for branches above 1.2 m was 30°-60° and the best angle for branches below 1.2 m was 30°.

References:

[1]毕慧慧,王兆成,傅松玲,等.不同措施对皖南地区薄壳山核桃育苗的影响[J].经济林研究,2018,36(4):118-122.[2]孙源蔚,王东晨,付文平.冀北山区拉枝时期及固形时间对‘寒富’苹果枝条生长的影响[J].中国果树,2018(4):21-23.[3]张英臣,刘万达,佟盛芳.寒地苹果幼树整形修剪技术[J].北方园艺,2007(9):120.[4]马保瑞,王连晶.苹果纺锤形整形修剪技术[J].山西果树,2018(4):41-42.[5]位杰,蒋媛,马建江,等.拉枝角度对库尔勒香梨枝叶生长及果实品质的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(3):111-116.[6]杨盛.‘玉露香梨’花芽分化及僵芽发生机理研究[D].晋中:山西农业大学,2015.[7]韦红霞.大樱桃幼树生长期修剪[J].西北园艺,2003(6):26.[8]高华君,孙山.甜樱桃高纺锤形树形培养存在问题及对策[J].北方园艺,2018(1):195-198.[9]徐清溪,秦士虎,刘佰新,等.甜樱桃品种早生凡引种及早期丰产栽培试验[J].中国果树,2007(3):20-22.[10]李军如.不同栽培措施对轮台白杏生长及结果影响的初步研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2012.[11]卢明艳,张东亚,陈同森,等.杏李保护地栽培关键技术[J].北方园艺,2016(8):48-49.[12]魏常燕.‘绿岭’核桃拉枝刻芽效应研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2013.[13]李长亮,冯毓琴,陈玉梁,等.拉枝角度对普通型和短枝型“富士”苹果树体生长生理特性和果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2018(8):48-52.[14]杜荣,曲俊贤,赵增强,等.不同拉枝角度对嘎拉苹果叶片及果实产量和品质的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(2):71-74.[15]李永武.不同拉枝角度对富士苹果生长和结果的影响研究[D].杨凌:西北农林技大学,2007.[16]韩明玉,李永武,范崇辉,等.拉枝角度对富士苹果树生理特性和果实品质的影响[J].园艺学报,2008(9):1345-1350.[17]苏曼琳,吴尚,马履一,等.3种修剪方法对文冠果芽内源激素含量和萌芽成枝的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(5):101-108,115.[18]牛自勉,陈敏克,孙俊宝,等.刻芽对苹果枝条内源激素及萌芽成枝的影响[J].果树科学,1998(3):198-202.[19]李保国,郭素萍,齐国辉,等.薄皮核桃新品种‘绿岭’[J].园艺学报,2007,34(1):261.[20]孔祥生,易现峰.植物生理学实验技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-12-05