|Table of Contents|

Growth Responses and Comprehensive Evaluation Analysis of Solanum wrightii Seedlings Under Different Light Intensity

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年20
Page:
68-74
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Growth Responses and Comprehensive Evaluation Analysis of Solanum wrightii Seedlings Under Different Light Intensity
Author(s):
KANG YachaoYIN TingWANG LinghuiTENG Weichao
(Forestry College,Guangxi University,Nanning,Guangxi 530004)
Keywords:
Solanum wrightiilight intensitycultivationshade tolerance
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20190946
Abstract:
Solanum wrightii seedlings were used as the experimental object,a completely random design was used for studying the effects of growth of different light intensity on Solanum wrightii seedlings.Four treatments involving 100%NS(natural sunshine,no shading net),46.4%NS(one shading net),11.8%NS(two shading nets) and 5.6%NS(three shading nets) were set up in the experiment.The purpose of the experiment is to provide scientific basis and extension for Solanum wrightii seedlings.The results showed that the growth indicators of Solanum wrightii were firstly increased and then decreased in general with the decline of light intensity.The 46.4%NS treatment reached the maximumin the indicators of ground diameter,biomass and root.However,The 11.8%NS treatment reached the maximum in the indicators of plant height and leaf area.Different light intensity requirement represented significant difference in the indicators of growth.Analysis of the membership and plasticity showed that the seedlings quality was best in the 46.4%NS treatment,and it had a good adaptability in the 46.4%NS treatment.In summary,the 46.4%NS treatment was the best light intensity requirement for Solanum wrightii seedlings,and Solanum wrightii seedlings had a strong shade tolerance.

References:

[1]中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1978.[2]郭霄.不同槭属植物幼苗对水分、光照及氮沉降的生理生态学响应[D].济南:山东大学,2014.[3]薛思雷.遮荫对水曲柳和蒙古栎苗木生长形态和光合生理的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2012.[4]GOMMERS C M M,VISSER E J W,ONGE K R S,et al.Shade tolerance:When growing tall is not an option[J].Trends in Plant Science,2013,18(2):65-71.[5]MORGAN D C,SMITH H.A systematic relationship between phytochrome-controlled development and species habitat,for plants grown in simulated natural radiation[J].Planta,1979,145:253-258.[6]NIINEMETS U,VALLADARES F.Photosynthetic acclimation to simultaneous and interacting environmental stresses along natural light gradients:Optimality and constraints[J].Plant Biol,2004,6:254-268.[7]关晓溪,隋常玲,胡海军,等.弱光胁迫对烟草幼苗生长发育的影响和相关基因qRT-PCR分析[J].分子植物育种,2019(4):1-7.[8]杜文茹.弱光胁迫对辣椒幼苗光合性能及生理特性的影响[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2018.[9]窦庆晨.弱光胁迫对不同小豆品种生长发育影响研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2018.[10]杨万基,于锡宏,蒋欣梅,等.弱光胁迫对番茄幼苗光合特性和根系生长的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(17):112-114.[11]梁曼曼,弓萌萌,李寒,等.光胁迫对翌年‘绿岭’核桃树体生长发育的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(17):34-39.[12]唐中华,郭晓瑞,于景华,等.弱光对长春花(Catharanthusroseus)幼苗中可溶性糖、生物碱及激素含量的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(11):4419-4424.[13]林凡,马松亚,潘锋,等.不同光照强度对格木苗木生长和生理生化特性的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(8):170-173.[14]NASIRUDDIN K M,SHARFUDDIN A F M.Effect of differect shading treatments on growth,yield and quality of tomato CV.Roma vf and Mary lobe[J].Punjab Vegetable Grower,1995,30(2):35-44.[15]陈军.不同种类的樱桃番茄营养品质分析及其耐弱光效应研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2016.[16]赵磊,智颖飙,李红丽,等.初始克隆分株数对大米草表型可塑性及生物量分配的影响[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(4):607-612.[17]VALLADARES F,CHICO J M,ARANDA L,et al.The greater seedling high-light tolerance of Quercus rubra over Fagus sylvatica is linked to a greater physiological plasticity[J].Trees,2002,16:395-403.[18]刘卓.不同苜蓿品种耐盐性、抗旱性比较的研究[D].长春:吉林农业大学,2008.[19]王丽娟,张平,顾青海,等.减光条件下番茄生态生理变化研究[J].天津农业科学,2002(1):18-22.[20]种培芳.弱光胁迫对甜瓜(Cucumis melo L.)光合特性及生长发育的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2003.[21]王五宏.串番茄株型性状遗传及与耐弱光性关系的研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2008.[22]王晓玲,石雷,孙吉,等.遮荫对山麦冬生长特性合生物量分配的影响[J].植物研究,2006,26(2):225-228.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-10-30