|Table of Contents|

Effect of Seven Plant Straws on the Growth of Continuous Cropping Tomato and the Activity of Soil Enzyme

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年20
Page:
17-24
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Seven Plant Straws on the Growth of Continuous Cropping Tomato and the Activity of Soil Enzyme
Author(s):
LI Zengliang; REN Jing; LIANG Xinyu; ZHANG Guohui; PAN Kai
(College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture，Northeast Agricultural University，Harbin，Heilongjiang 150030)
Keywords:
straw; continuous cropping; the growth of tomato; organic matter; soil enzymes
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20190798
Abstract:
With seven kinds of different crop straw residues as material，using randomized block design，different straws were added in the soil of continuous cropping tomato for 10 years，the control was the soil without the straw residues，a total of eight treatments.The effect of different straws for tomato continuous cropping soil on tomato growth and soil enzymes and the root-knot nematode were studied，in order to provide a theoretical basis for the ecological control of root-knot nematode and the overcoming of continuous cropping obstacles.The results showed that the tomato grew the most healthy for the treatment of maize and onion straw.The addition of different crop straws could increase soil pH and reduce soil EC value，which was beneficial to improve soil environment.Adding marigold straw could increase the content of soil organic matter，which was significantly higher than the control on 50th day.Adding different crop straws at each sampling period had different effects on soil enzyme activity.And on 30th day, urease and invertase activity of the treatments of marigold and Jerusalem artichoke straw was significantly higher than the control. On 40th day, neutral phosphatase and invertase activity of the treatments of the maize and marigold straw was significantly higher than control. On 50th day,the neutral phosphatase and invertase activity of the treatments of onion and garlic straw was significantly lower than control.On 60th day, neutral phosphatase activity of maize and wheat straw was significantly higher than control.On 70th day, invertase activity of the treatments of wheat, maize and tomato straw was significantly higher than control and neutral phosphatase activity of each treatment made no differences.And we made simple correlation among soil enzymes and organic matter，pH and EC.The results showed that urease and neutral phosphatase activity showed very significant negative correlation with pH，and significant positive correlated to the EC，and were very significant positive correlation of urease and organic matter.Onion straw significantly inhibited the number of tomato root knots.In conclusion，adding a certain amount of onion straw into tomato continuous cropping soil can significantly promote tomato growth，improve soil environment，and have a certain control effect on root knot nematodes.

References:

[1]李欢，杨仁斌，陈亮.秸秆能源利用模式分析及进展[J].农业环境科学学报，2007，26(S1):628-631.[2]闫慧荣，曹永昌，谢伟，等.玉米秸秆还田对土壤酶活性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)，2015(7):177-184.[3]任万军，黄云，吴锦秀，等.免耕与秸秆高留茬还田对抛秧稻田土壤酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报，2011(11):2913-2918.[4]VERONICA A Z，MAYSOON M.Microbial communities and enzyme activities in soils under alternative crop rotations compared to wheat-fallow for the Central Great Plains[J].Applied Soil Ecology，2007，37:41-52．[5]武志杰，张海军，许广山，等.玉米秸秆还田培肥土壤的效果[J].应用生态学报，2002，13(5):539-542.[6]孙艺文.不同作物残茬及秸秆对连作土壤的修复作用[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学，2013.[7]BIAO G，SEAN B，XIU L，et al.Efficacy of garlic straw application against root-knot nematodes on tomato[J].Scientia Horticulturae，2013，163:49-57.[8]孙从法，潘兆福，董勤成，等.黄瓜根结线虫病的综合防治技术[J].北方园艺，2002(5):67-68．[9]曹志平，周乐昕，韩雪梅.引入小麦秸秆抑制番茄根结线虫病[J].生态学报，2010，30(3):765-773.[10]许华，宋晓艳，蒋梦娇.万寿菊秸秆的杀线作用及其对黄瓜植株生长的影响[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)，2012，48(2):164-168.[11]NAZ I，PALOMARES-RIUS J E，KHAN S M，et al.Control of southern root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita(kofoid and white) chitwood on tomato using green manure of Fumaria parviflora Lam (Fumariaceae)[J].Crop Protection，2015，67:121-129.[12]MONFORT W S，CSINOS A S，DESAEGER J，et al.Evaluating brassica species as an alternative control measure for root-knot nematode (M.incognita) in Georgia vegetable plasticulture[J].Crop Protection，2007，26(9):1359-1368.[13]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:北京农业出版社，2000:30-34．[14]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:北京农业出版杜，1986:260-360.[15]GONG Z Y，FU X P，ZHOU X G，et al.Effects of plant residues on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) growth，soil enzyme activities and microbial communities[J].Allelopathy Journal，2016，38(2):147-157.[16]PLOEG A T.Effects of selected marigold varieties on root-knot nematodes and tomato and melon yields[J].Plant Disease，2002，86(5):505-508.[17]杨思存，霍林，王建成.秸秆还田的生化他感效应研究初报[J].西北农业学报，2005，14(1):52-56.[18]马永清，毛仁钊，刘孟雨，等.小麦秸秆的生化他感效应[J].生态学杂志，1993，12(5):36-38．[19]侯永侠，周宝利，吴晓玲.不同作物秸秆对辣椒的化感效应[J].生态学杂志，2009，28(6):1107-1111.[20]乔天长，赵先龙，张丽芳.秸秆腐解液对玉米苗期根系生长的影响[J].作物杂志，2014(4):120-124.[21]宫再英，周新刚，潘凯，等.不同比例的玉米、小麦、菊芋秸秆对黄瓜幼苗生长及相关生理指标的影响[J].作物杂志,2015(5):126-131.[22]姜勇，梁文举，闻大中.免耕对农田土壤生物学特性的影响[J].土壤通报，2004，35(3):347-351.[23]吴凤芝，孟立君，王学征.设施蔬菜轮作和连作土壤酶活性的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报，2006，12(4):554-558，564.[24]李秀玲，吕光辉，何雪芬.连作年限对土壤理化性质及酶活性的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境，2012(9):93-97.[25]潘剑玲，代万安，尚占环，等.秸秆还田对土壤有机质和氮素有效性影响及机制研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报，2013(5):526-535.[26]路怡青，朱安宁，张佳宝，等.免耕和秸秆还田对土壤酶活性和微生物群落的影响[J].土壤通报，2014，45(1):85-90.[27]杨滨娟，黄国勤，钱海燕.秸秆还田配施化肥对土壤温度、根际微生物及酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报，2014(1):150-157.[28]徐金强，刘素慧，刘庆涛，等.大蒜秸秆还田对温室番茄连作土壤微生物及根结线虫病的影响[J].江苏农业科学，2017，45(7):91-93.[29]ALABOUVETTE C，OLIVAIN C，STEINBERG C.Biological control of plant diseases:The European situation[J].European Journal of Plant Patholog，2006，114(3):329-341.[30]张淑红，周宝利，张磊，等.土壤添加蛇床子(Cnidium monnieri)和苦参(Sophora flavescens)对茄子黄萎病及根际微生物的化感影响[J].生态学报，2008，28(10):5194-5199.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-10-30