|Table of Contents|

Phenotypic Changes During Growth and Development of Non-heading Chinese Cabbage

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年20
Page:
1-8
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Phenotypic Changes During Growth and Development of Non-heading Chinese Cabbage
Author(s):
HE Hongmei1; SHEN Haiyan1; XIA Dongdong1; WANG Yujie1; ZHANG Xuelian2; GU Qun1
(1.Zealquest Scientific Technology Co.Ltd.，Shanghai 200030;2.College of Horticulture，Nanjing Agricultural University，Nanjing,Jiangsu 210095)
Keywords:
non-heading Chinese cabbage; plant morphological; leaf; pod; phenotype
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20190655
Abstract:
The non-heading Chinese cabbage varieties ‘Suzhouqing’‘Kangre605’‘Ziluolan’‘Heixinwu’‘Gaogengbai’‘Nantongmaerduo’‘Zicaitai’were used as test materials，which were planted in greenhouses.Plant images were obtained by LemnaTec Scanalyzer 3D instrument at different developmental stages and from different orientations.Through the image analysis，the phenotypic parameters of the projection area，caliper length，compactness，plant height，plant width，leaf and pod were obtained.The change of indicators provided a reference for the cultivation，production and breeding of non-heading Chinese cabbage.The results showed that the top projection area caliper length of ‘Zicaitai’ increased firstly and then decreased，while these two parameters in other varieties increased first，then decreased，then increased to reach the maximum value and then decreased.Plant height and width increased first after planting，then decreased then increased to the maximum value，decreased finally.Top compactness increased gradually and then decreased after reaching the maximum.Leaf length，leaf width，leaf circumference and leaf area increased gradually after planting，and then decreased slowly after reaching the maximum.The pods were divided into five types,short-narrow，long-narrow，long-wide，medium long-narrow，medium long-wide.In summary，there were significant differences among varieties of cabbage after 60 days planting，and the changing trends in plant height，plant width，compactness and leaf were consistent，while the projection area and caliper length were different.And all index values reached to the maximum at the reproductive stage.

References:

[1]程昕.几种小白菜的品种植物学性状调查及品质分析[J].现代园艺，2012(8):12.[2]侯喜林，宋小明.不结球白菜种质资源的研究与利用[J].南京农业大学学报，2012，35(5):35-42.[3]韩建明，侯喜林，徐海明，等.不结球白菜种质资源形态性状多样性分析[J].生物数学学报，2010，25(1):137-146.[4]侯喜林.不结球白菜育种研究新进展[J].南京农业大学学报，2003(4):111-115.[5]杨有新，杨泽茂，吴才君，等.植物表型组学研究进展[J].江西农业大学学报，2015，37(6):1105-1112.[6]玉光惠，方宣钧.表型组学的概念及植物表型组学的发展[J].分子植物育种，2009，7(4):639-645.[7]CHEN D，NEUMANN K，FRIEDEL S，et al.Dissecting the phenotypic components of crop plant growthand drought responses based on high-throughput image analysis[J].Plant Cell，2014，26(12):4636-4655.[8]GOLZARIAN M，FRICK R，RAGENDRAN K，et al.Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high-throughput images of cereal plants[J].Plant Methods，2011，7(1):2-12.[9]刘朝阳，穆金艳，孙丽，等.小白菜主要营养品质及与农艺性状的相关分析[J].北方园艺，2014(15):10-13.[10]孙丽，赵锋亮，李贞霞，等.二十二份小白菜主要农艺性状的遗传及相关分析[J].北方园艺，2014(17):1-4.[11]郝慧楠，王倩，侯喜林，等.不结球白菜主要农艺性状的分离分析[J].南京农业大学学报，2010(4):8-12.[12]谢鑫鑫，郑学立，林峰，等.46份不结球白菜种质资源的评价[J].江西农业学报，2018(2):16-20.[13]徐延驰.北方地区不结球白菜品种选育研究[J].农业科技与装备，2012(8):1-4.[14]付炳堃，孙梦遥，韦美嫚，等.种植密度对不结球白菜叶面积指数动态变化及产量的影响[J].北方园艺，2019(3):65-69.[15]卢盼玲，郭世荣，张佳蕊，等.基质含水量对不结球白菜生长的影响[J].北方园艺，2018(23):16-24.[16]HOULE D，GOVINDARAJU D R，OMHOLT S.Phenomics:The next challenge[J].Nature Reviews Genetics，2010，11(12):855-866.[17]程智慧.蔬菜栽培学总论[M].北京:科学出版社，2010.[18]苗锦山，刘彩霞，戴振建，等.葱种质资源数量性状的聚类分析、相关性和主成分分析[J].中国农业大学学报，2010，15(3):41-49.[19]段志芬，刘本英，汪云刚，等.云南野生茶树资源农艺性状多样性分析[J].西北农业学报，2013，22(1):125-131.[20]RAJENDRAN K，TESTER M，ROY S J.Quantifying the three main components of salinity tolerance in cereals[J].Plan，Cell and Environment，2009，32(3):237-249.[21]HAIRMANSIS A，BERGER B，TESTER M，et al.Image-based phenotyping for non-destructive screening of differen tsalinity tolerance traits in rice[J].Rice，2014，7:7-16.[22]NEILSON E H，EDWARDS A M，BLOMSTEDT C K，et al.Utilization of a high-throughput shoot imaging system to examine the dynamic phenotypic responses of a C4 cereal crop plant tonitrogen and water deficiency over time[J].Journal of Experimental Botany，2015，7(66):1817-1832.[23]刘翠红，陈丽君，吕长义，等.基于图像处理技术的水稻株型参数测量算法[J].农机化研究，2015(12):232-235.[24]BERGER B，REGT B，TESTER M.High-throughput phenotyping of plantshoots[J].High-throughput Phenotyping in Plants，2012，918:9-20.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-10-29