|Table of Contents|

Ecological Sensitivity Analysis of the Shuguang Waterfront Park in Harbin

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年16
Page:
90-97
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Ecological Sensitivity Analysis of the Shuguang Waterfront Park in Harbin
Author(s):
GAO Yanbing1; TAO Hongbo2; ZHANG Yujiao3; GAO Yan3; WANG Daqing4; XIAO Bing5
(1.Fushun Economic Development Zone Sub-Bureau,Fushun City Planning Bureau,Fushun,Liaoning 113006;2.Forestry Technical Guidance Station in Tongshan District,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221100;3.College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150030;4.Agricultural Research Institute of Economics of Heilongjiang Province,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150036...
Keywords:
Shuguang Waterfront Park; ecological sensitivity analysis; GIS technology; AHP and weighted superposition method; moderate to low sensitivity
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20190248
Abstract:
In the planning and design of regional landscape,the ecological sensitivity analysis should be carried out first.Due to low environmental carrying capacity of high-sensitive areas and strong interference sensitivity to human activities,reasonable planning should be carried out according to different sensitivities.As a mature and widely used technical method,ecological sensitivity analysis could provide a scientific and effective basis for urban planning.In this case, the park′s topography was undulating,the slope of the park was diversified,and the project site of the majiagou river crossing from north to south has become the limiting factor of the park′s landscape planning and design.In this study,GIS technology,AHP and weighted superposition were adopted to determine the sensitive factors and their weights.The results showd that the elevation,slope direction and water area were three single ecological sensitive factors in Shuguang Waterfront Park.The elevation of the park was in the moderate and low sensitivity level,the slope was in the moderate sensitivity and insensitivity level,and the water area was between the low sensitivity and insensitivity level.After the three single factors of ecological sensitivity were superimposed according to different weights,the areas of extremely sensitive,highly sensitive,moderately sensitive,low sensitive and insensitive in Shuguang Waterfront Park accounted for 0.54%,11.33%,37.47%,29.06% and 10.80% of the total area of the park,respectively.The comprehensive ecological sensitivity of the Waterfront Park was moderate and low,which was conducive to landscape planning,design,construction and development.

References:

[1]杨志峰,徐俏,何孟常，等.城市生态敏感性分析[J].中国环境科学,2002,22(4):360-364.[2]鲁敏,孔亚菲.生态敏感性评价研究进展[J].山东建筑大学学报,2014(4):347-352.[3]KUMAR K S K,PARIKH J.Agriculture and climate sensitivity[J].Global Environmental Change,Part A:Human and Policy Dimensions,2001,1(2):147-154.[4]WIKTELIUS S,ARDO J,FRANSSON T.Locust control in ecologically sensitive areas[J].Need for guidelines Ambio,2003,32(7):463-468.[5]朱志玲,吴咏梅,张敏.基于GIS的宁夏生态环境敏感性综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):101-105,111.[6]曹建军,刘永娟.GIS支持下上海城市生态敏感性分析[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1805-1812.[7]朱东国,谢炳庚,陈永林.基于生态敏感性评价的山地旅游城市旅游用地策略:以张家界市为例[J].经济地理,2015,35(6):184-189.[8]钱婵英.常州市生态敏感区保护与利用规划研究[D].南京:东南大学,2017.[9]武鹏达,鲁学军,侯伟,等.GIS支持下土地生态环境敏感性评价:以金坛市为例[J].测绘科学,2016,41(2):81-86.[10]崔爽,苏鸿,叶良松,等.一种基于空间对象的缓冲区分析算法[J].地理与地理信息科学,2011,27(1):38-41.[11]梅昌艮.基于GDM-AHP的模糊综合评价法在生态敏感性评价中的应用研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2009.[12]郭金玉,张忠娠,孙庆云.层次分析法的研究与应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2008(5):148-153.[13]胡多才,尹一帆,程燕芳.典型干热河谷区生态敏感性评价：以东川为例[J].林业建设,2017(5):21-25.[14]李玉杰.贵州独山国家重点生态功能区生态敏感性评价[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2017,37(3):66-73.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-08-29