|Table of Contents|

Screening and Potting Experiments of the Fungicide Formulation on Fusarium Wilt of Muskmelon

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年20
Page:
40-45
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Screening and Potting Experiments of the Fungicide Formulation on Fusarium Wilt of Muskmelon
Author(s):
GU Meiling1BAI Xue12ZHOU Mo1JIANG Suyue1BAI Qingrong1ZHAO Tingchang2
(1.College of Agronomy,Jilin Agricultural University,Changchun,Jilin 130118;2.Institue of Plant Protection,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100193)
Keywords:
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melonisfungicidesynergistic coefficients
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20190227
Abstract:
Using Fusarium wilt pathogen of muskmelon as test material,the toxicities of eight agents were tested by the mycelial growth rate and spore germination methods against the pathogen.Calculation of synergistic factors for mycelial growth and spore germination by Wadley method,respectively.And determine the optimal ratio and conduct pot experiment.The results showed that myclobutanil 25% EC and prochloraz 45% ME had the best inhibitory effect on mycelial growth with EC50 0.001 2 mg?L-1 and 0.004 6 mg?L-1,respectively.Azoxystrobin 250 g?L-1 SC and SYP-Z048 25% EC had the best inhibitory effect on spore germination with EC50 0.092 2 mg?L-1 and 3.263 2 mg?L-1,respectively.The four kinds of agents were screened by proportional mixing method.There were 2 mixing ratios obtained which had synergies and addition evaluation on mycelial growth and spore germination of the pathogen.Prochloraz and azoxystrobin were mixed with the mass ratio of 4∶1,SYP-Z048 and azoxystrobin were mixed with the mass ratio of 2∶3.The control effects on melon wilt were 80.42% and 76.57%,respectively,which were significantly higher than single-agent control by pot experiment with 10 mL per plant of 1.0 g?L-1 fungicide solution.These results provide evidences for the use of control agents for Fusarium wilt of muskmelon.

References:

[1]吴德顺.西甜瓜枯萎病的发生与防治[J].石河子科技,1994(2):40-41.[2]赵明星.甜瓜枯萎病的发生与防治[J].农民致富之友,2011(14):62.[3]FICCADENTI N,SESTILI S,ANNIBALI S,et al.Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.melonis Race 1,2 in muskmelon lines Nad1 and Nad2[J].Plant Disease,2002,86(8):897-900.[4]WECHTER W P,WHITEHEAD M P,THOMAS C E,et al.Identification of a randomly amplified polymorphic DNA marker linked to the Fom 2 Fusarium wilt resistance gene in muskmelon MR-1[J].Phytopathology,1995,85(85):1245-1249.[5]李瑞琴.甜瓜枯萎病病原学及防治技术研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2004.[6]刘畅.甜瓜不同抗性品种根系分泌物对枯萎病菌的化感作用研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2018.[7]余小兰,邹立飞,邹雨坤,等.甜瓜枯萎病拮抗菌的筛选及鉴定[J].南方农业学报,2018,49(6):1118-1124.[8]裴龙飞.蔬菜尖孢镰刀菌对咪鲜胺和咯菌腈的抗药性研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016.[9]刘影,马海霞,杨信东.用EXCEL中的VBA编写植物病害流行学常用程序软件包[J].吉林农业大学学报,2008,30(4):436-441.[10]肖荣凤.瓜类尖孢镰刀菌生理分化特性研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2007.[11]王廷廷.农药组合物发明专利协同增效作用判断方法[J].农药市场信息,2013(29):4-7.[12]李怡,彭文涛,李勤奋,等.一株耐铝甜瓜枯萎病拮抗细菌的分离鉴定及其耐铝特性研究[J].热带作物学报,2018,39(6):1176-1182.[13]刘磊,梁昌聪,覃和业,等.香蕉枯萎病田间发病株的高效灭菌方法筛选[J].植物保护学报,2015,42(3):362-369.[14]何玉会,白庆荣,杜佳朋,等.甜瓜枯萎病的病原鉴定及药剂筛选研究[J].北方园艺,2014(3):114-117.[15]赵杰,庄隽怡,唐亚芹,等.甜瓜枯萎病菌的生物学特性及防治药剂的室内筛选[J].上海农业学报,2010,26(1):129-132.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-10-30