|Table of Contents|

Comparison of Yield and Quality of Fruit Tomato Cultivars in Solar Greenhouse in High and Cold Area

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年15
Page:
61-68
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparison of Yield and Quality of Fruit Tomato Cultivars in Solar Greenhouse in High and Cold Area
Author(s):
GAO Zixing1; 2; MA Jinfang1; 2; HU Xiaohui1; 2
( 1.College and Horticulture,Northwest A & F University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100;2.Key Laboratory of Protected Horticulture Engineering in Northwest China,Ministry of Agriculture,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100)
Keywords:
Qinghai Ledu district;  tomato;  introduction experiment;  yield;  quality;  hierarchical analysis
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20190176
Abstract:
Eighteen large fruit tomato cultivars were used as materials,and cultivated in Qinghai Ledu district′s greenhouse in spring.The yield and quality of each tomato variety were measured,and the comprehensive performance of the tomato varieties (including soluble solids,organic acids and sugar-acid ratio) and nutritional quality (vitamin C,soluble protein and reducing sugar) were evaluated by hierarchical analysis method.In solar greenhouse cultivation in Qinghai Ledu district,in eighteen large fruit tomato varieties,the highest yield of tomato cultivars was ‘Desaishengdi’,the lowest was ‘Shenjian′aifenyihao’; ‘Heishi’ had the highest content of soluble solids,the lowest was ‘Desai0216’; ‘Heishi’ and ‘Gailiangchaojifenna’ had the highest content of organic acids,the lowest were ‘Jingxuanshijifenwang’ and ‘Desai0216’; ‘Shijifenguanwang’ had the highest content of vitamin C,the lowest was ‘KangTY’; ‘Heishi’ had the highest content of soluble protein,the lowest was ‘Aotefunong’; ‘Heishi’ had the highest content of reducing sugar,the lowest was ‘Desaiyingfen’.Using the hierarchical analysis method to evaluate the comprehensive performance of tomato varieties,the analysis result of comprehensive quality evaluation was ‘Desaishengdi’>‘Desaiyubao’>‘Desaichaoguan’>‘Desaiyingfen’>‘Desai0801’>‘Desai0216’>‘Jindi’>‘Gailiangchaojifenna’>‘Desaimingzhu’>‘Aotefunong’>‘Jingxuanshijifenwang’>‘KangTY’>‘Heishi’>‘Shijifenguanwangerhao’>‘Aofenyihao’>‘FenGuoyingshitou’>‘Shijifenguanwang’>‘Shenjian′aifenyihao’.The comprehensive performance of the tomato varieties (including soluble solids,organic acids and sugar-acid ratio) and nutritional quality (vitamin C,soluble protein and reducing sugar) were evaluated by hierarchical analysis method.Result of quality and output was ‘Desaishengdi’>‘Desaiyubao’>‘Desaichaoguan’>‘Desaiyingfen’>‘Desai0801’>‘Desai0216’>‘Jindi’>‘Gailiangchaojifenna’>‘Desaimingzhu’>‘Aotefunong’>‘Jingxuanshijifenwang’>‘KangTY’>‘Heishi’>‘Shijifenguanwangerhao’>‘Aofenyihao’>‘Fenguoyingshitou’>‘Shijifenguanwang’>‘Shenjian′aifenyihao’.‘Desaishengdi’ and ‘Desaiyubao’ had high yield and quality,those were suitable to popularize planting in the high cold area for example Qinghai Ledu district.

References:

[1]张晓东,刘志刚,张勇.设施番茄品种比较试验[J].中国瓜菜,2017,30(6):31-34.[2]程智慧.园艺概论[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.[3]程智慧.蔬菜栽培学各论[M].北京:科学出版社,2010. [4]刘德才.浅谈乐都区春小麦高产栽培技术[J].农业开发与装备,2017(3):157.[5]高君凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.[6]马庆华,李永红,梁丽松,等.冬枣优良单株果实品质的因子分析与综合评价[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(12):2491-2499.[7]张晓玮,龚雪梅,李琳,等.基于层次分析法的皖北地区引种的彩叶植物综合评价[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2018,44(5):580-587.[8]陈鹏羽,朱陇强,王紫薇,等.黄土高原区苹果种植适宜性评价：以陕西省永寿县为例[J].陕西农业科学,2019,65(2):94-98.[9]陈惠明,刘晓红.国内外番茄育种现状和发展趋势[J].湖南农业科学,1996(5):25-27.[10]刘梦龙,赵伟,蒋丽媛,等.关中东部早春茬番茄优良品种筛选[J].西北农业学报,2018,27(3):402-410.[11]刘庞源,张宝海,何伟明.传统优良番茄品种与新番茄品种品质比较[J].中国蔬菜,2009,1(10):37-40.[12]张洋,梁燕.日光温室樱桃番茄品种比较试验[J].长江蔬菜,2017(12):41-44.[13]陈宗玲,钟连全,徐全明,等.16个草莓新品种在北京昌平生长结果性状比较[J].中国果树,2018(2):23-28，32.[14]黄文,郭竞,李自娟,等.定植密度和留果穗数对春大棚番茄生长及产量和品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2018(22):79-82.[15]MAHAJAN G,SINGHK G.Response of greenhouse tomato to irrigation and fertigation[J].Agricultural Water Management,2006,84(1-2):202-206.[16]KUSCU H,TURHAN A,OZMEN N,et al.Optimizing levels of water and nitrogen applied through drip irrigation for yield,quality,and water productivity of processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)[J].Horticulture Environment & Biotechnology,2014,55(2):103-114.[17]ZOTARELLI L,DUKESA M D,SCHOLBERG J M S,et al.Tomato nitrogen accumulation and fertilizer use efficiency on a sandy soil,as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling[J].Agricultural Water Management,2009,96(8):1247-1258.[18]程远,万红建,刘超超,等.十六个樱桃番茄品种果实风味品质相关指标比较分析[J].浙江农业学报,2018(11):1859-1869.[19]秦立金,李嘉薇,李慧敏,等.不同樱桃番茄新品种生长及品质特性比较研究[J].赤峰学院学报(自然科学版),2018,34(11):10-12.[20]王孝宣,李树德,东惠茹,等.番茄品种耐寒性与ABA和可溶性糖含量的关系[J].园艺学报,1998(1):56-60.[21]黄文,李自娟,应芳卿,等.7个早熟抗TY番茄新品种比较试验[J].长江蔬菜,2017(16):48-50.[22]郭伟民,田如霞,王静.山西晋中地区秋冬茬设施番茄品种比较试验[J].种子,2018,37(10):128-129,131.[23]吴久赟,刘翔宇,雷静,等.吐鲁番地区11个葡萄品种的设施栽培特性分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(3):134-141.[24]董在成,张艳玲,冯定超,等.天津地区日光温室番茄品种比较试验[J].天津农业科学,2017,23(12):80-84.[25]刘中良,郑建利,焦娟,等.鲁中地区日光温室番茄品种比较试验[J].北方园艺,2017(20):85-88.[26]刘洋,齐艳花,杨恩庶,等.日光温室越冬番茄品种比较试验[J].蔬菜,2017(1):14-18.[27]马中福.民勤县日光温室番茄品种比较试验[J].中国农业信息,2016(23):143.[28]张丽茁.早春棚室早熟高产番茄及黄瓜品种筛选[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2013.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-08-15