|Table of Contents|

Evaluation of Introduction Adaptability and Ornamental Value of Eight Kinds of Wild Flowers in Jiamusi City

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年14
Page:
79-85
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation of Introduction Adaptability and Ornamental Value of Eight Kinds of Wild Flowers in Jiamusi City
Author(s):
QI Haiyan1; LI Yanjie2; WU Dongmei3; ZHAO Peipei4; CHENG Haitao1; SUN Rui1
(1.School of Life Sciences,Jiamusi University,Jiamusi，Heilongjiang 154007；2.Experimental Animal Center,Jiamusi University,Jiamusi，Heilongjiang 154007；3.School of Pharmacy,Jiamusi University,Jiamusi，Heilongjiang 154007；4.Jiamusi City Garden Scenic Area Management Office,Jiamusi，Heilongjiang 154002)
Keywords:
wild flowers; ornamental value; introduction; evaluation; landscape application
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20190138
Abstract:
Eight kinds of wild flowers,such as Heteropappus hispidus,Crepis tectorum,Cichorium intybus,Inula japonica,Cirsium setosum,Angelica amurensis,Hypericum ascyron and Potentilla chinensis,were introduced in Jiamusi.The morphological characteristics,growth habits and adaptability of the eight kinds of wild flowers were observed and recorded.The introduction adaptability scoring system of the eight target materials was constructed by four main factors,oversummering,overwintering,growth potential and resistance to diseases and insect pests.Constructing an evaluation system of ornamental value for eight kinds of target flowers with sixteen indicators in four aspects including flower characteristics,flower quantitative trait,other traits and introduction adaptability.The fine wild species that can be applied to landscaping according to the scores of ornamental value and introduction adaptability were screened out.The results showed that Heteropappus hispidus,Hypericum ascyron,Cichorium intybus,Inula japonica and Cirsium setosum had higher ornamental value and score of introduction adaptability was over 90 scores,so they could be applied to gardens as excellent ornamental plants.The ornamental value of Crepis tectorum was general,but its effect of slice value get a high score and introduction adaptability even get a full score,so it was suitable for extensive management of forest edge and flower lawn.The ornamental value of Angelica amurensis and Potentilla chinensis was low,so it was not recommended to apply them in large quantities to urban gardens in Jiamusi.

References:

[1]尹娟,蔡秀珍,田径.野生花卉资源调查及其观赏形状的评价[J].北方园艺,2017(17)：119-124．[2]陈俊愉.中国农业百科全书：观赏园艺卷[M].北京:农业出版社,1996:78-477．[3]周涛,朴永吉,林元雪.中国野生花卉资源的研究现状及展望[J].世界林业研究,2004,17(4):45-48．[4]陈睿,潘远智,陈其兵.野生花卉资源评价因子及评价方法确定[J].北方园艺,2009(10):201-204．[5]YU S X,JANSSENS S B,ZHU X Y,et al.Phylogeny of impatiens(Balsaminaceae):Integrating moleculat and morphological evidence into a new classification[J].Cladistics,2015,32(2):179-197.[6]DING B,SUDHINDRA R G,WNG J C,et al.Impatiens wawuensis(Balsaminaceae):A new species from Sichuan,China[J].Phytotaxa,2016,273(4):293-298.[7]尹衍峰,彭春生.百花山野生花卉资源的开发利用[J].中国园林,2003,19(8):72-74.[8]刘江枫.福州市野生兰科植物资源与观赏评价[D].福州:福建农业大学,2010．[9]白锦荣,张启翔,潘会堂.云南滇西北地区蔷薇属（Rosa L.）植物资源调查与评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2009,10(2)：218-223.[10]赵焕臣,许树柏.层次分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1986.[11]秦寿康.TOPSIS价值函数模型[J].系统工程学报,2003(1):37-42.[12]雷金睿,辛欣,宋希强,等.基于AHP的海口市公园绿地植物群落景观评价与结构分析[J].西北林学院学报,2016(3):262-268.[13]刘维斯,颜玉娟,都晓璐.城市公园植物景观评价指标体系建立方法研究[J].山西建筑,2009,35(14):343-344.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-08-12