|Table of Contents|

Analysis of Farmers′ Knowledge of Farmland Shelterbelt Ecosystem Service Function in Ecologically Vulnerable Areas

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年19
Page:
160-167
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Analysis of Farmers′ Knowledge of Farmland Shelterbelt Ecosystem Service Function in Ecologically Vulnerable Areas
Author(s):
ZHANG Hongli1; 2; TONG Wenjing1
(1.College of Economics and Management,Shihezi University,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832000;2.Agricultural Modernization Research Center,Shihezi University,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832000)
Keywords:
ecologically fragile area; farmer cognition; farmland shelterbelt ecosystem service
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20190079
Abstract:
Farmland shelterbelt is the foundation for stabilizing farmland ecosystems in ecologically fragile areas such as Xinjiang.Farmers′ perception of their value directly affects the construction of farmland shelterbelt system.This study obtained the awareness of Xinjiang farmers on the ecological services of farmland shelter forests through field surveys of six regions and their subordinate townships in Xinjiang and one-on-one interviews,and used SPSS software to analyze the factors affecting farmers′ awareness.The results showed that,1) farmers′ awareness of farmland shelterbelt ecological services was the highest in wind protection and sand fixation;2) farmers in different regions had different understandings of farmland shelterbelt ecological services；3) the main factors affecting farmers′ awareness of farmland shelterbelt ecosystem services were age,education level,understanding of harvesting quotas and distance between farmland and shelterbelt.This study put forward,1)increase education investment,strengthen the education and training of farmers;2)increase the government′s publicity efforts;3)improve the ecological compensation mechanism protection forest;4)improve the economic level of farmers and other suggestions.

References:

[1]范志平,曾德慧,朱教君,等.基于林网体系尺度上的农田防护林持续经营模型Ⅰ:模型的构建[J].生态学杂志,2003(5):82-87.[2]COSTANZAR,D′ARGE R,GROOT R D,et al.The value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387:253-260.[3]ELLIS A,SEMANTICS G,RATIONAL-EMOTIVE T.Alfred korzybski memorial lecture[J].ETC：A Review of General Semantics,2007(4):12-28.[4]MATTHEW J K,STEPHEN D R.Environmental attitudes,motivations,and contingent valuation of nonuse values：A case study involving endangered species[J].Ecological Economics,2000,32(1):93-107.[5]贺娟,舒晓波,于秀波.鄱阳湖区农户对湿地生态系统服务认知的调查与分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(4):776-781.[6]刘雪芬,杨志海,王雅鹏.畜禽养殖户生态认知及行为决策研究:基于山东、安徽等6省养殖户的实地调研[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2013,23(10):169-176.[7]余亮亮,蔡银莺.生态功能区域农田生态补偿的农户受偿意愿分析:以湖北省麻城市为例[J].经济地理,2015,35(1):134-140.[8]李青,薛珍,陈红梅,等.基于CVM理论的塔里木河流域居民生态认知及支付决策行为研究[J].资源科学,2016,38(6):1075-1087.[9]张玉玲,张捷,张宏磊,等.文化与自然灾害对四川居民保护旅游地生态环境行为的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(17):5103-5113.[10]朱玉伟,桑巴叶,王永红,等.新疆农田防护林不同林龄生物量及碳储量[J].西北林学院学报，2018,33(2):116-122.[11]张红丽,程鹏飞,李婕.干旱区农田防护林承包意愿及其影响因素分析[J].华东经济管理，2018,32(4):71-77.[12]刘康,陈一鹗.农田防护林效益及其对农作物产量的影响[J].水土保持通报,1993(5):39-43.[13]黄鹏进.农民经济行为的文化逻辑:兼读《农民的道义经济学:东南亚的反叛与生存》的思考[J].中国农村观察,2006(1):62-65,79.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-10-09