|Table of Contents|

Analysis on Adoption Degree of Farmers′ Ecological Farming Based on Boosted Regression Tree

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年18
Page:
157-164
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Analysis on Adoption Degree of Farmers′ Ecological Farming Based on Boosted Regression Tree
Author(s):
LIU Yanting1; CHEN Meiqiu1; XIE Xianxin1; KUANG Foyuan1; 2
(1.Research Center of Rural Land Resources Utilization and Protection，Jiangxi Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Ecology of Poyang Lake Basin,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330045;2.Department of Geography，Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)
Keywords:
ecological farming; adoption degree; boosted regression tree; farmers
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20184688
Abstract:
Ecological farming is an important mean to realize the sustainable utilization of cultivated land resources and implement the ‘three-in-one’ cultivated land protection strategy of quantity，quality and ecology.Systematic analysis of the influencing factors of farmers′ ecological farming adoption has positive significance for the formulation of farmers′ ecological farming incentive policies.Based on the questionnaire survey of 1 488 farmers in Jiangxi Province，the main influencing factors of farmers′ ecological farming adoption were analyzed by using the Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) model.The results showed that，1) Overall，more than half of the sample farmers had a positive attitude toward the adoption of ecological farming，but there was still room for further strengthening.2) The adoption degree of farmer ecological farming was mainly affected by family characteristics and personal characteristics，followed by technology adoption environment and social network characteristics were the weakest.3) The proportion of agricultural income，the actual cultivated land area，the length of farming，the age，the cultural level，the completeness of farmland facilities，the number of labor，the propaganda and dissemination had a positive impact on the adoption of agricultural farming，and the adequacy of irrigation water sources had a negative effect.Based on the results of the research，the study put forward the corresponding policy recommendations.

References:

[1]徐志刚,张炯,仇焕广.声誉诉求对农户亲环境行为的影响研究:以家禽养殖户污染物处理方式选择为例[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2016(10):44-52.[2]刘宁.关乎中华民族生存之基的大事[J].求是,2013(21):58-59.[3]陈美球,刘桃菊,李志朋,等.农户生态耕种的现状与激励对策:基于江西省2028户农户化肥农药使用行为的专题调研[J].土地经济研究,2017(2):103-117.[4]丁洪建,吴次芳,梁留科.耕地保护理念的创新研究[J].中国土地科学,2002(4)：14-19.[5]王利敏,欧名豪.粮食主产区农户耕地保护现状及认知水平分析:基于全国10个粮食主产区1198户农户的问卷调查[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013(3):14-19.[6]梁流涛,翟彬,樊鹏飞.基于MA框架的农户生产行为环境影响机制研究:以河南省传统农区为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(5):145-153,158.[7]MOHAPATRA R.Farmers′ education and profit efficiency in sugarcane production：A stochastic frontier profit function approach[J].IUP Journal of Agricultural Economics,2012,8(2):18-35.[8]王思琪,陈美球,彭欣欣,等.农户分化对环境友好型技术采纳影响的实证研究:基于554户农户对测土配方施肥技术应用的调研[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(6):187-196.[9]LAPPLE D.Adoption and abandonment of organic farming：An empirical investigation of the Irish Drystock Sector[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,2010,61(3),697-714.[10]杨皓天,刘秀梅,句芳.粮食生产效率的随机前沿函数分析:基于内蒙古微观农户层面1312户调研数据[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(12):82-88.[11]蒋琳莉,张俊飚,颜廷武,等.基于Probit模型的农户农业生产性废弃物弃置行为研究:以湖北省为例[J].农业现代化研究,2016,37(5):917-925.[12]李婷婷,李艳军,刘瑞涵.心理距离情境对农户农资购买决策中初始信任的影响:信息处理模式的中介机制[J].管理学报,2016,13(11):1690-1701.[13]DEININGER K.Collective agricultural production：A solution for transition economies?〖KG-*3〗[J].World Development,1995,23(8)：1317-1334.[14]RIZAL R.Effect of Integrated Pest Management Farmer Field School (IPMFFS) on farmers knowledge，farmer groups ability，process of adoption and diffusion of IPM in Jember District[J].Journal of Environmental Extension，2010,2(1):29-35.[15]LYNCH L,HARDIE I，PARKER D.Analyzing agricultural landowners′willingness to install streamside buffers[D].Maryland:The University of Maryland，2002:19-20.[16]朱月季,高贵现,周德翼.基于主体建模的农户技术采纳行为的演化分析[J].中国农村经济,2014(4):58-73.[17]黄炜虹,齐振宏,邬兰娅,等.农户从事生态循环农业意愿与行为的决定:市场收益还是政策激励?〖KG-*3〗[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2017,27(8):69-77.[18]王丽静,刘秀艳.循环农业相关概念与循环农业发展中的几个问题[J].农业经济,2011(10):20-21.[19]万亚胜,程久苗,吴九兴,等.基于计划行为理论的农户宅基地退出意愿与退出行为差异研究[J].资源科学,2017,39(7):1281-1290.[20]赵微,周惠,杨钢桥,等.农民参与农地整理项目建后管护的意愿与行为转化研究:以河南邓州的调查为例[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(3):55-62.[21]韩洪云,杨增旭.农户测土配方施肥技术采纳行为研究:基于山东省枣庄市薛城区农户调研数据[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(23):4962-4970.[22]高晨雪,汪明,叶涛,等.基于农户特征的连续务农及稳定参保行为影响因素探究:以湖南省鼎城区匡家桥村为例[J].农业现代化研究,2015,36(5):850-856.[23]孔祥智,方松海,庞晓鹏,等.西部地区农户禀赋对农业技术采纳的影响分析[J].经济研究,2004(12):85-95,122.[24]冯晓龙,霍学喜.社会网络对农户采用环境友好型技术的激励研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2016,22(3):72-81.[25]DE′ATH G.Boosted trees for ecological modeling and prediction[J].Ecology,2007,88(1):243-251.[26]ELITH J，LEATHWICK J R，HASTIE T．A working guide to boosted regression trees[J].Journal of Animal Ecology,2008,77(4):802-813.[27]葛跃,王明新,孙向武,等.基于增强回归树的城市PM2.5日均值变化分析:以常州为例[J].环境科学,2017,38(2):485-494.[28]邝佛缘,陈美球,鲁燕飞,等.基于增强回归树的农户环保行为决策研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(2):130-133.[29]李春林,刘淼,胡远满,等.基于增强回归树和Logistic回归的城市扩展驱动力分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(3):727-737.[30]李俊鹏,冯中朝,吴清华.劳动力老龄化阻碍了农业生产吗?：基于空间计量模型的实证分析[J].南京审计大学学报,2018,15(4):103-111.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-10-08